No abstract

Purpose of the review: The microbiota in mammalian hosts can affect maturation and function of the immune system and has been associated with health and disease. We will review new findings on how this dynamic environmental factor impacts alloimmunity and therapy in transplant hosts. Recent findings:The microbiota changes after transplantation and immunosuppressive therapy. New data indicate that different microbial community structures have distinct impact on graft outcome, from promoting, to inhibiting or being neutral to transplant survival. In addition, we will address reciprocal interactions between the microbiota and immunosuppressive drugs, as well as the suitability of the microbiota as a predictive biomarker and its utility as adjunct therapy in transplantation.Summary: Advances in microbiome sequencing and wider availability of gnotobiotic facilities are enabling mechanistic investigations into the commensal communities and pathways that modulate allograft outcome, responsiveness to immunosuppression and side effects of drugs. A better understanding of the functions of the microbiota may help mitigate drug toxicity, predict drug dosage and dampen alloimmunity in transplant patients.

No abstract

Solid organ transplantation is the preferred treatment for end-stage organ failure. Although transplant recipients take life-long immunosuppressive drugs, a substantial percentage of them still reject their allografts. Strikingly, barrier organs colonized with microbiota have significantly shorter half-lives than non-barrier transplanted organs, even in immunosuppressed hosts. We previously demonstrated that skin allografts mono-colonized with the common human commensal Staphylococcus epidermidis (S.epi) are rejected faster than germ-free (GF) allografts in mice because the presence of S.epi augments the effector alloimmune response locally in the graft. Here, we tested whether host immune responses against graft-resident commensal microbes, including S.epi, can damage colonized grafts independently from the alloresponse.Naïve hosts mounted an anti-commensal T cell response to colonized, but not GF, syngeneic skin grafts. Whereas naïve anti-graft-commensal T cells modestly damaged colonized syngeneic skin grafts, hosts with prior anti-commensal T cell memory mounted a post-transplant immune response against graft-resident commensals that significantly damaged colonized, syngeneic skin grafts. Importantly, allograft recipients harboring this host-versus-commensal immune response resisted immunosuppression. The dual effects of host-versus-commensal and host-versusallograft responses may partially explain why colonized organs have poorer outcomes than sterile organs in the clinic.