Nowadays, there are a lot of dangers, not only those related to the military. Particular attention should be paid to the threat of guerrilla activity. Therefore, the aim of this article is to indicate the essence of contemporary guerrilla operations in conflicts, and their methods of operation that allow them to achieve their goals. It was also assumed that the modern crisis response operations, and especially COIN (counterinsurgency) operations, constitute a comprehensive approach to counteracting guerrilla activity.
This article uses theoretical methods. Using the analysis and synthesis of materials and studies, the most important conclusions were pointed out.
The leading role in prevention insurgency activities lies with the United Nations, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and their crisis response operations. In the Strategic Concept NATO 2010 specialists are putting more attention to conducting counterinsurgency operations (COIN). COIN operations are nowadays the most comprehensive tool for combating guerrilla activity, which mainly hits the civilian population. The concepts of using the assumptions of anti-Partisan operations should be implemented on a full scale, including in the armed forces of the Republic of Poland.
Particular attention should be paid to the threat of the guerrilla activity in conflicts. These problems are complex and they deal with many aspects (social, economic, cultural, political and many others). Moreover the partisans activities are irregular and they are often targeted at civilians. This article indicates the methods and techniques used by insurgents in the fight against the state / government. Reference has also been made to the activities that inhibit their activity - complex counterinsurgency operations.
<i>This paper includes discussions about the issue of evaluating CROs. They are an expression
of the theoretical exploration of factors and criteria which may have a significant impact
on such an evaluation. It should be noted that evaluation of CROs is an important and
complex problem, because today, in the real environment dominated by conflicts and
crises, there is a real need to involve some of the resources of third party countries to resolve
tensions in unstable areas. The need for a response from multinational forces (national,
alliance) is dictated by the dynamics of the changes taking place in the security sphere, the
multi-dimensionality of crises and conflicts, and their unpredictability (Iraq, Afghanistan).
Today it is emphasised that such a commitment will form the basis of future international
relations.</i>
W artykule autor porusza problematykę organizacji i funkcjonowania szeroko rozumianej ochrony ludności w Polsce, realizowanej przez różne powołane do tego elementy systemu bezpieczeństwa narodowego (podsystemy). Te systemowe rozwiązania służyć mają bezpieczeństwu ludności, poprzez działania przygotowania i prowadzenia takiej ochrony. W artykule wyróżniono działania i przedsięwzięcia zarządzania kryzysowego oraz wskazano na zależności i wspólne płaszczyzny przedsięwzięć zarządzana kryzysowego, ratownictwa, obrony i ochrony. Posługując się teoretycznymi metodami badawczymi, takimi jak: analiza, synteza, porównanie i wnioskowanie, stwierdzono, że w strukturze tych systemów zachodzą istotne zbieżności realizowanych przedsięwzięć (planistycznych) i zadań. Elementami tożsamymi są przede wszystkim podmioty, realizujące tę ochronę, i ich szerokie kompetencje władcze. Ponadto należy wskazać, że podejmowanie czynności ratunkowych realizowane jest na rzecz wszystkich systemów, niezależnie od stanu funkcjonowania państwa. Zatem wdrażane rozwiązania zarządzania kryzysowego wykorzystują potencjał wykonawczy innych podsystemów.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.