SummaryThe effect of restricted feeding and realimentation on growth and carcass composition was studied in two experiments, each using 30 rabbits of the Swedish White Domestic Breed. The rabbits were slaughtered in groups of 5. The restricted feeding started at 1.0 or 1.6 kg live weight respectively, restriction lasting to 2.1 or 2.4 kg. The highest slaughter weight was 3.2 kg. The feed restriction was to 60 p. 100 of the ad libitum consumption of the litter mates at the same age or same weight and realimentation ad libitum or 100 p. 100 respectively. The nutritive value of the pelleted diet was determined in digestibility trials and carcass composition was studied by mincing and chemical analysis of soft tissue.Restricted feeding produced carcasses which, at the same weight, had a lower content of fat, a higher content of protein and the same content of water in the soft tissue. After realimentation, the carcasses had still a lower content of fat, the same content of protein and a higher content of water. There was a tendency to a higher feed consumption at ad libitum feeding during realimentation compared with continuous ad libitum feeding. The restriction had a significant effect on digestibility, which was better in the restricted animals, especially in expt. 1.The treatments had no effect on total feed consumption, total feed efficiency or protein retention. There was a tendency to better growth rates during realimentation and in expt. 2 also a tendency to a better daily carcass weight gain. However, the differences were not significant.Of the internal organs, weight of liver was the most affected by restriction and realimentation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.