This research was a case study presenting a red notice that was suspected of being false against fugitive Djoko Tjandra by two police generals at the State Police of the Republic of Indonesia. This was a case study research and the research approach method was qualitative. Creswell defines the qualitative method as a research method based on a constructive perspective, that is various meanings; meanings that are constructed socially and historically to develop a theory or pattern. The researchers collected and developed open data, intending to develop themes from the data obtained. The results of the study, based on the exposure to the case analysis, it is suspected that there has been an abuse of power against the power and authority of the state institution of the Indonesian National Police. The researchers suggested that it is better if the legislators of the laws and regulations of the Police of the Republic of Indonesia think about it whether operational accountability is appropriate to the executive of the President of the Republic of Indonesia. Therefore, there is a check and balance of law enforcement behavior carried out by the police.
Berdasarkan investigasi awal diketahui bahwa, evaluasi program Pendidikan dan Latihan (Diklat) Fungsional Perancang tahun 2015 dan tahun-tahun sebelumnya hanya didasarkan hasil penilaian dari peserta, evaluasi pengajar, evaluasi kinerja penyelenggara, evaluasi pasca diklat, dan evaluasi terhadap kurikulum. Hal tersebut menujukkan bahwa model evaluasi yang digunakan adalah model evaluasi Kirkpatrick yang memiliki 4 (empat) komponen yakni komponen reaction, komponen learning, komponen behavior, dan komponen result. Akan tetapi berdasarkan Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia Nomor M.73.KP.04.12 Tahun 2006 tentang Pendidikan dan Latihan Jabatan Fungsional Perancang, program diklat fungsional perancang memiliki 6 (enam) komponen yakni komponen perekrutan, komponen respon, komponen hasil belajar, komonen kebiasaan, komponen penempatan, komonen kinerja. Untuk itu terdapat dua komponen program diklat perancang yang belum terevaluasi oleh model evaluasi Kirkpatrick, yakni komponen perekrutan dan komponen penempatan. Untuk itu model evaluasi Kirkpatrick perlu dikembangkan atau dimodifikasi melalui penelitian dan pengembangan agar dapat digunakan untuk mengevaluasi dikat fungsinal perancang.
The notary is a public official who is authorized to make authentic deeds, in which the obligation of a notary in carrying out his position must act honestly, reliably, independently, impartially, thoroughly, and safeguard the interests of the parties involved in legal actions. This is known as the precautionary principle for a notary in carrying out his position as a public official. The purpose of this writing is to examine the legal implications of counterfeiting and the responsibility of a notary to the binding sale and purchase agreement he made. The research method used in this paper is normative juridical with a statutory and case study approach. The results and findings obtained after conducting research and analysis of the problems in this paper, namely the legal impact due to the negligence of a notary in making a binding sale and purchase agreement because to forgery, so that the legal consequences of these PPJB are void, this is because it is not in accordance with the legal requirements of an agreement as stated in Article 1320 of the Civil Code, namely those relating to lawful causes. This happens because the notary in carrying out his authority does not carry out his obligations related to the principle of precautionary, therefore the notary must be responsible for his actions that have been carried out in accordance with the law and code of ethics. So it can be concluded that the deed made by the notary is null and void and is not an authentic deed but a private deed.
Setiap bidang tanah yang telah diproses pendaftarannya wajib diumumkan dan kemudian dibukukan baru diterbitkan sertipikatnya. Pengumuman itu bersifat negatif bertedensi positif. Karena itu sertipikat dinyatakan sebagai alat bukti yang kuat (bukan mutlak). Ini berarti masih dimungkinkan pihak-pihak mengajukan keberatan atas sertipikat itu, asal saja dilakukan tidak lebih dari 5 tahun sejak sertipikat itu diterbitkan, disertai syarat selama itu ia sudah pernah melakukan komplain kepada pemegang hak, kantor pertanahan setempat atau pengadilan. Upaya hukum itu dikenal dengan sebutan rechtsverwerking yang bermakna menambah kepastian hukum sertipikat hak atas tanah.
Indonesia is an archipelagic country as well as a pluralistic country in religion, ethnicity, language, and others. The state also guarantees citizens to continue their offspring through a legal marriage as regulated in Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage. In the marriage law, it is stated that the validity of marriage is based on the law of their respective religions. This means that interfaith marriages cannot be carried out as was the case before this law was introduced. The research method used is descriptive analytical with a juridical normative approach. After an academic study, it turns out that this view is wrong, because the law provides a way out by submitting an application to the local district court so that interfaith marriages can be registered as legal marriages. One example of practice, interfaith marriages carried out at the Surakarta District Court in Stipulation No. 333/Pdt.P/2019/PN.Skt.Keywords: Interfaith Marriage; Legal Perspective; Human Rights. AbstrakNegara Indonesia adalah negara kepulauan sekaligus sebagai negara pluralistik dalam agama, suku, bahasa, dan lain-lain. Negara juga menjamin warga negara untuk melanjutkan keturunan melalui perkawinan yang sah sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan. Dalam undang-undang perkawinan menyatakan bahwa sahnya perkawinan berdasarkan hukum agamanya masing-masing. Ini berarti perkawinan beda agama tidak bisa dilakukan seperti yang pernah berlaku sebelum undang-undang ini ada. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah deskriptif analitis dengan pendekatan normatif yuridis. Setelah dilakukan telaah akademik ternyata pandangan itu keliru, karena undang-undang memberi jalan keluar dengan cara mengajukan permohonan kepada pengadilan negeri setempat agar perkawinan beda agamanya dapat dimohonkan pencatatannya menjadi perkawinan yang sah. Salah satu contoh praktik, perkawinan beda agama yang dilakukan di Pengadilan Negeri Surakarta dalam Penetapan No.333/Pdt.P/2019/PN.Skt.Kata Kunci: Perkawinan Beda Agama; Perspektif Hukum; Hak Asasi Manusia
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.