This research was a case study presenting a red notice that was suspected of being false against fugitive Djoko Tjandra by two police generals at the State Police of the Republic of Indonesia. This was a case study research and the research approach method was qualitative. Creswell defines the qualitative method as a research method based on a constructive perspective, that is various meanings; meanings that are constructed socially and historically to develop a theory or pattern. The researchers collected and developed open data, intending to develop themes from the data obtained. The results of the study, based on the exposure to the case analysis, it is suspected that there has been an abuse of power against the power and authority of the state institution of the Indonesian National Police. The researchers suggested that it is better if the legislators of the laws and regulations of the Police of the Republic of Indonesia think about it whether operational accountability is appropriate to the executive of the President of the Republic of Indonesia. Therefore, there is a check and balance of law enforcement behavior carried out by the police.
Indonesia is a rule of law, which means that there is a guarantee for the functioning of an independent or independent prosecutor in carrying out the judiciary and other tasks and for upholding law and justice based on the state constitution and the prevailing laws and regulations. The Attorney General's Office (AGO) is a state institution in Indonesian constitutional law that can carry out or have authority on behalf of the state in prosecution and also has other powers based on applicable provisions. The problem of this research is that the discretionary power of prosecution is too loose a tendency to abuse power to commit a criminal act. terrorized corruption culture This research is qualitative and normative juridical. The discretion that is too free for prosecutors tends to abuse power to carry out a culture of corruption in the Prosecutor's Office (PO). Researchers suggest that discretionary power in state institutions is limited and supervised by external agencies on the performance of prosecutors so that checks and balances occur in state prosecutors' institutions.
BUM Desa diatur dalam Pasal 87 sampai dengan Pasal 90 Undang- undang No. 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Desa. Perihal desa dapat memiliki BUM Desa diatur dalam Pasal 87 Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2014, yang menyatakan: “Desa dapat mendirikan Badan Usaha Milik Desa yang disebut BUM Desa”, dan ayat (2) yang menyatakan:”BUM Desa dikelola dengan semangat kekeluargaan dan kegortongroyongan,”dan ayat (3) yang mengatakan:”BUM Desa dapat menjalankan usaha di bidang ekonomi dan atau pelayanan umum sesuai dengan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan. Dari ketentuan di atas, artinya BUM Desa mempunyai potensi sebagai usaha mandiri masyarakat desa dalam memberikan kesejahteraan desa, untuk itu pentingnya peran kepala desa telah diberi kewenangan untuk menggali potensi desa ataukah mengadakan unit unit usaha bisnis untuk kepentingan masyarakat desa melalui pemasukan pada kas daerah, oleh karenanya peran kepala desa sangat penting. Agar dapat BUM Desa dikelola dengan baik dan profesional, maka kepala desa dan pengurus BUM Desa harus paham betul prinsip Good Corporate Governance dalam tata kelola BUM Desa.
The Republic of Indonesia, based on the 1945 Constitution, the second Amendment, recognizes the existence of a Special Region and its distinctive governance. Article 18B, Paragraph (1), of the 1945 Constitution reads, “The State shall recognize and respect entities of regional administration that possess a specificity or a distinctiveness that are to be regulated by law”. Previously, the governance of special region was also regulated in the first version of the 1945 Constitution that was stipulated on August 18, 1945. In addition, it is contained in other constitutions that were formerly effective in Indonesia: the 1949 Constitution of the Republic of the United States of Indonesia, and the 1950 UUDS. The clearest arrangements regarding the status of special region were covered by the 1950 UUDS, whereas the 1945 and the 1949 Constitutions do not provide detailed description of special regional government units. This triggers some fundamental questions related to the substance of special region. This study reveals several facts related to the existence and administration of government in special regions. Among other things, the current arrangement does not open up the possibility of forming new special regions and the administration of special region only exists at the provincial level.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.