SUMMARYWhat is known and objective: Many trials have indicated that interventions by pharmacists resulted in beneficial outcomes with positive effects on cardiovascular diseases. The interventions through pharmacist-involved pharmaceutical care in patients with heart failure (HF) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) were reviewed systemically and examined. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify relevant articles describing pharmacist interventions in HF and ACS. Most studies were evaluated qualitatively, and the strength of evidence was graded according to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) guidelines. Some of the studies were also assessed by a meta-analysis. Results: A total of 26 studies containing data on 9415 patients were identified. For all studies, the strength of the body of evidence was reviewed and graded, and 14 studies among them were meta-analysed. The evidence was not strong enough to determine the effects of pharmaceutical care on major and patient-centred outcomes, except the prescription rates of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) with a high strength of evidence. In the meta-analysis, all-cause hospitalization [odds ratio (OR), 0Á74; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0Á58-0Á94] was reduced and the prescription rates of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEI; OR 1Á43; 95% CI, 1Á07-1Á91) and beta-blockers (OR 1Á92; 95% CI, 1Á24-2Á96) were significantly higher in the pharmaceutical care group compared with the usual care group. What is new and conclusions: All-cause hospitalization showed improvement in the pharmaceutical care group. However, the strength of evidence for the majority of outcomes with pharmaceutical care, except direct performance measures such as prescription rates, was either insufficient or low. This could be explained by the presence of imprecision and inconsistency derived from the diversity of pharmaceutical care, the heterogeneity of patient populations or clinical settings. Moreover, it may indicate the necessity for homogeneous applicable criteria for assessment. A standardized consensus of the guidelines for pharmaceutical care service should be considered to improve homogeneity.

These findings could be useful to the health care provider for adjustment of tacrolimus dosage in adult liver transplant recipients with various clinical factors.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are known to interact with the oral anticoagulant warfarin and can cause a serious bleeding complication. In this study, we evaluated the risk factors for international normalized ratio (INR) increase, which is a surrogate marker of bleeding, after addition of an NSAID in a total of 98 patients who used warfarin. Patient age, sex, body mass index, maintenance warfarin dose, baseline INR, coadministered medications, underlying diseases, and liver and kidney functions were evaluated for possible risk factors with INR increase ≥15.0% as the primary end-point. Of the 98 patients, 39 (39.8%) showed an INR elevation of ≥15.0% after adding a NSAID to warfarin therapy. Multivariate analysis showed that high maintenance dose (>40 mg/week) of warfarin (P=0.001), the presence of coadministered medications (P=0.024), the use of meloxicam (P=0.025) and low baseline INR value (P=0.03) were the risk factors for INR increase in respect to NSAID-warfarin interaction. In conclusion, special caution is required when an NSAID is administered to warfarin users if patients are taking warfarin >40 mg/week and other medications interacting with warfarin.

Background/AimsThe Compliance Questionnaire-Rheumatology (CQR) is a validated scale to evaluate patient compliance for anti-rheumatic medications. We developed a Korean version of the CQR (KCQR) and confirmed its reliability and validity.MethodsWe prepared the KCQR by translating and back-translating the original CQR with modifications to adapt it to Korean culture. Fifty Korean patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were enrolled in this study. The test-retest reliability of the KCQR was evaluated at a 2-week interval using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The validity of the KCQR was assessed by identifying associations between KCQR scores and patient compliance, measured using pharmacy refill data.ResultsThe reliability of the KCQR was adequate, with an ICC of 0.71 for test-retest reliability. With respect to validity, the summed score of the weighted KCQR showed a significant correlation with pharmacy refill data (r2 = 0.57) on multiple regression analysis.ConclusionsOur results indicate that the KCQR is a reliable, valid instrument to evaluate compliance of Korean patients for RA medications.

A decision matrix helped identify drugs for which PDM provides the greatest potential benefit at one Korean hospital.