Latino immigrants in the United States are disproportionately affected by HIV. Barriers to consistent attendance (retention) in HIV primary care constrain opportunities for HIV treatment success, but have not been specifically assessed in this population. We conducted semistructured interviews with 37 HIV-infected Latinos (aged ≥18 years and born in Puerto Rico or a Latin American Spanish-speaking country) and 14 HIV providers in metropolitan Boston (total n = 51). The Andersen Model of Healthcare Utilization informed a semistructured interview guide, which bilingual research staff used to explore barriers to HIV care. We used thematic analysis to explore the processes of retention in care. Six ubiquitous themes were perceived to influence HIV clinic attendance: (1) stigma as a barrier to HIV serostatus disclosure; (2) social support as a safety net during negative life circumstances; (3) unaddressed trauma and substance use leading to interruption in care; (4) a trusting relationship between patient and provider motivating HIV clinic attendance; (5) basic unmet needs competing with the perceived value of HIV care; and (6) religion providing a source of hope and optimism. Cultural subthemes were the centrality of family (familismo), masculinity (machismo), and trusting relationships (confianza). The timing of barriers was acute (e.g., eviction) and chronic (e.g., family conflict). These co-occurring and dynamic constellation of factors affected HIV primary care attendance over time. HIV-infected Latino immigrants and migrants experienced significant challenges that led to interruptions in HIV care. Anticipatory guidance to prepare for these setbacks may improve retention in HIV care in this population.

We sought to determine linkage to and retention in HIV care after HIV diagnosis in foreign-born compared with US-born individuals. From a clinical data registry, we identified 619 patients aged ≥18 years with a new HIV diagnosis between 2000 and 2012. Timely linkage to care was the proportion of patients with an ICD-9 code for HIV infection (V08 or 042) associated with a primary care or infectious disease physician within 90 days of the index positive HIV test. Retention in HIV care was the presence of an HIV primary care visit in each 6-month period of the 24-month measurement period from the index HIV test. We used Cox regression analysis with adjustment for hypothesized confounders (age, gender, race/ethnicity, substance abuse, year and location of HIV diagnosis). Foreign-born comprised 36% (225/619) of the cohort. Index CD4 count was 225/μl (IQR 67–439/μl) in foreign-born compared with 328/μl (IQR 121–527/μl) in US-born (p<0.001). The proportion linked to care was 87% (196/225) in foreign-born compared with 77% (302/394) in US-born (p=0.002). The adjusted hazard ratio of linkage to HIV care in foreign-born compared with US-born was 1.28 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05–1.56). Once linked, there was no difference in retention in care or virologic suppression at 24 months. These results show that despite late presentation to HIV care, foreign-born persons can subsequently engage in HIV care as well as US-born. Interventions that promote HIV screening in foreign-born persons are a promising way to improve outcomes in these populations.

No abstract

Purpose: Two-stage tissue expander (TE) to implant breast reconstruction is commonly performed by plastic surgeons. Prepectoral implant placement with acellular dermal matrix (ADM, e.g., AlloDerm®) reinforcement is evidenced by minimal postoperative pain. However, the same is not known for TE-based reconstruction. We performed this study to explore the use of complete AlloDerm® reinforcement of breast pocket tissues in women undergoing unilateral or bilateral mastectomies followed by immediate, two-stage tissue expansion in the prepectoral plane.Methods: Patients (n = 20) aged 18-75 years were followed prospectively from their preoperative consult to 60 days post-TE insertion. The pain visual analog scale (VAS), Patient Pain Assessment Questionnaire, Subjective Pain Survey, Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF), postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) survey, BREAST-Q Reconstruction Module, and short-form 36 (SF-36) questionnaires were administered. Demographic, intraoperative, and 30-and 60-day complications data were abstracted from medical records. After TE-to-implant exchange, patients were followed until 60 days postoperatively to assess for complications.Results: Pain VAS and BPI-SF pain interference scores returned to preoperative values by 30 days post-TE insertion. Static and moving pain scores from the Patient Pain Assessment Questionnaire returned to preoperative baseline values by day 60. The mean subjective pain score was 3.0 (0.5 standard deviation) with seven patients scoring outside the standard deviation; none of these seven patients had a history of anxiety or depression. Median PONV scores remained at 0 from postoperative day 0 to day 7. Patient-reported opioid use dropped from 89.5% to 10.5% by postoperative day 30. BREAST-Q: Sexual well-being scores significantly increased from preoperative baseline to day 60 post-TE insertion. Changes in SF-36 physical functioning, physician limitations, emotional well-being, social functioning, and pain scores were significantly different from preoperative baseline to day 60 post-TE insertion. Five participants had complications within 60 days post-TE insertion. One participant experienced a complication within 60 days after TE-to-implant exchange.Conclusions: We describe pain scores, opioid usage, patient-reported outcomes data, and complication profiles of 20 consecutive patients undergoing mastectomy followed by immediate, two-stage tissue expansion in the prepectoral plane. We hope this study serves as a baseline for future research.

Women are less likely to be senior authors, invited to write in scientific journals, and to be cited in high impact journals. The aim of this study was to investigate trends in authorship and gender differences in peer-reviewed burn literature over 13 years. We performed a retrospective analysis of original research articles published from January 2009 to September 2021 in three burn journals. A gender determination application was used to categorize the gender of the first and senior author. Of the 3,908 articles analyzed, 42.5% had a woman first author and 27.6% had a woman senior author. We identified 2,029 unique senior authors, 29.0% of whom were women. Woman senior authorship was associated with increased odds of woman first authorship [OR=2.31 (95% CI 2.00, 2.67); p&lt;0.001]. The percentage of papers with a woman senior author increased from 17.8% in 2009 to 35.7% in 2021. If this 1.0% (95% CI: 0.50 – 1.51%) linear trend increase per year in woman senior authorship continues, we will expect to see equal proportions of woman and man senior authors in the included journals starting in 2037. The field of burn care is far from reaching gender parity with respect to authorship of peer-reviewed publications. Supporting and encouraging gender concordant and discordant first:last authorship dyads in mentorship as well as redistributing obligations that may detract from authorship opportunities are potential ways to improve parity in authorship and academia.

Purpose Our goals were to characterize associations of author number, author gender, and institutional affiliation on ratings and acceptances of abstracts submitted to one surgical education conference over 5 years. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all abstracts submitted between 2017 and 2021 to the annual meeting of the Association for Surgical Education (ASE). Abstract data included average rater scores, acceptance status, author lists, and institutional affiliations. We cross-referenced last author affiliation with top-40 National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded institutions and used a gender determination software to code first and last author genders. Results We analyzed 1,162 abstracts. Higher reviewer scores demonstrated positive, weak associations with more authors [r(1160) = 0.191, p < 0.001] and institutions [r(1160) = 0.182, p < 0.001]. Significantly higher scores were noted for abstracts with last authors affiliated with top-40 NIH-funded institutions [4.18 (SD 0.96) vs. 3.72 (SD 1.12), p < 0.001]. Women were first authors (51.8%) ( n = 602) and last authors (35.4%) ( n = 411) of the time. Abstracts were rated significantly higher with women rather than men as first authors [3.98 (SD 0.99) vs. 3.82 (SD 1.12), p = 0.011] or last [4.01 (SD 1.04) vs. 3.82 (SD 1.10), p = 0.005]. Across all years, abstracts were accepted more often as podium or plenary presentations when submitted by women first [ n = 279, 59.7% ( p = 0.002)] or last [ n = 183, 38.4% ( p = 0.095)] authors. Conclusion Abstracts whose last authors were affiliated with top-40 NIH-funded institutions received significantly higher scores, possibly indicating increased tangible or intangible resources contributing to research efforts. Abstracts with women first and last authors scored higher and were more frequently invited for plenary and podium presentations.

Introduction The complex nature of burn pain has debilitating effects on burn patients’ physiological and psychological wellbeing. Characterized by its overwhelming intensity and extensive duration, burn pain involves inflammatory and neuropathic components. These pain responses vary in depth, severity, and sensation during and after the healing process. Despite best efforts, burn pain remains a widespread challenge for providers to effectively predict and address. Methods A retrospective chart review of 442 patients admitted to the Burn Center for treatment of burn injuries between January 2015 and February 2022 was conducted. Charts of patients age &gt;18 and length of stay &gt;4 days were included in the analysis. Mean age on admission was 50.13±17 years and 34% of the sample were female. Data on clinical and demographic factors was extracted electronically and manually from patients’ electronic medical records. Numerical pain scale ratings documented by nursing were averaged for the first and last 48 hours of patients’ hospital stay. Linear regression analysis was performed to assess significant predictors of pain prior to discharge. Results We controlled for TBSA, length of stay, gender and psychiatric diagnosis and discovered that pain within the first 48 hours of admission and age were statistically significant predictors of average pain prior to discharge. Specifically, younger age was associated with increased pain ratings. When comparing average pain levels between the first and last 48 hours, 22% reported an increase of more than 1 point in their pain, 42% had no difference in average pain ratings, and 36% reported a decrease of more than 1 point. Prior to discharge, 36% of the sample reported pain higher than 6 and 17% reported pain greater than 7. Conclusions Heightened pain is challenging in burn injuries even prior to discharge, especially for younger patients and those who report initial high levels of pain. For many burn survivors, pain remains the same or worsens from admission to discharge, putting them at risk for negative outcomes such as chronic pain, PTSD, suicidality, sleep disturbances, and reduced function. Future research is needed to determine if early intervention can serve to mitigate these risks and improve long term recovery and quality of life. Applicability of Research to Practice Patients at risk for increased pain upon discharge can be identified by understanding the factors contributing to this phenomenon during early treatment. Early, targeted, evidence-based interventions during treatment and following discharge will allow effective management of pain. Younger patients and patients with higher initial pain should be closely monitored and given multimodal pain interventions, thereby enhancing their comfort and overall recovery process.

Introduction Burn injuries cost the USA ~$976.6 million annually. Physician reimbursement has lagged despite years of lobbying by physician groups. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services plan to cut physician reimbursement by 4.2% in 2023. Evaluating reimbursement data for hospital-based procedures is timely, including burn procedures. We hypothesized Medicare reimbursement trends for common burn procedures decreased from 2010-2022. Methods We obtained pricing data from the publicly-available Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool for 26 Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes: “Burns–preparation of wound bed” (15002-15005), “Burns–split thickness skin graft” (15100-15101 & 15120-15121), “Burns–skin substitute” (15271-15278), “Cultured epidermal autograft” (15150-15152 & 15155-15157), and “Cell Suspension Epidermal Autograft” (15110-15111 & 15115-15116). We calculated percent differences for reimbursement; compound annual growth rate (CAGR); and percent differences for work, facility, non-facility, and malpractice relative value units (RVUs). Analysis was conducted in R 4.1.2. Results The three largest reimbursement increases were for CPT codes 15272 (24.6%), 15155 (23.7%), and 15003 (10.9%); the three largest decreases were for 15121 (-16.8%), 15120 (-6.1%), and 15275 (-5.0%). The three largest CAGR increases were for CPT codes 15272 (2.2%), 15155 (1.8%), 15274 (0.9%), and 15003 (0.9%); the three smallest were for 15121 (-1.5%), 15120 (-0.5%), and 15275 (-0.5%). Table 1 shows trends of RVUs. Conclusions Our 12-year analysis of Medicare reimbursement trends for 26 burn procedures demonstrated an overall increase in hospital reimbursement and parallel net decrease in physician work RVUs. Reimbursements were increasingly allocated away from surgeons to facility fees and malpractice insurance. Cultured epidermal autograft to the head, neck, hands, and feet (15155) saw the largest increase in Medicare reimbursement with no change in direct physician reimbursement while split-thickness skin grafts to the head, neck, & genitals (15120 & 15121) showed decreased rates. Future work is needed to understand why these trends are occurring to advocate against physician reimbursement cuts. Applicability of Research to Practice Studies contributing to price transparency allow stakeholders to focus on why burn surgeons are receiving lower reimbursements.