We performed a systematic study of the sensitivity of dielectric spectroscopy to erythrocyte morphology. Namely, rabbit erythrocytes of four different shapes were prepared by precisely controlling the pH of the suspending medium, and their complex permittivities over the frequency range from 0.1 to 110 MHz were measured and analyzed. Their quantitative analysis shows that the characteristic frequency and the broadening parameter of the dielectric relaxation of interfacial polarization are highly specific to the erythrocyte shape, while they are insensitive to the cell volume fraction. Therefore, these two dielectric parameters can be used to differentiate erythrocytes of different shapes, if dielectric spectroscopy is applied to flow-cytometric inspection of single blood cells. In addition, we revealed the applicability and limitations of the analytical theory of interfacial polarization to explain the experimental permittivities of non-spherical erythrocytes.

We have developed what we believe is an efficient method to determine the electric parameters (the specific membrane capacitance C(m) and the cytoplasm conductivity kappa(i)) of cells from their dielectric dispersion. First, a limited number of dispersion curves are numerically calculated for a three-dimensional cell model by changing C(m) and kappa(i), and their amplitudes Deltaepsilon and relaxation times tau are determined by assuming a Cole-Cole function. Second, regression formulas are obtained from the values of Deltaepsilon and tau and then used for the determination of C(m) and kappa(i) from the experimental Deltaepsilon and tau. This method was applied to the dielectric dispersion measured for rabbit erythrocytes (discocytes and echinocytes) and human erythrocytes (normocytes), and provided reasonable C(m) and kappa(i) of the erythrocytes and excellent agreement between the theoretical and experimental dispersion curves.

We performed dielectric spectroscopy measurements on aqueous solutions of glycine betaine (N,N,N-trimethylglycine), which is known to be a strong stabilizer of globular proteins, over a wide concentration range (3-62 wt %) and compared the results with our previously published data for aqueous solutions of urea, a representative protein denaturant. The hydration number of betaine (9), calculated on the basis of the reduction in the dielectric relaxation strength of bulk water with addition of betaine, is significantly larger than that of urea (2). Furthermore, the dielectric relaxation time increased with betaine concentration, while that remained nearly constant for the urea-water system over a wide concentration range. This difference between urea and betaine is probably related to their opposite effects on the protein stabilization.