No abstract

Introduction. There are various methods of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction of which the two main choices in autograft reconstruction involve the use of the bone-patella tendon-bone or hamstring graft. Femoral fixation can be divided into three main types: cortical suspensory devices such as Endobutton (Smith & Nephew, Arthrex), interference screws, and femoral transfixation devices such as Transfix (Arthrex) and Rigidfix (Depuy-Mitek). The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcome between Rigidfix, Transfix and Endobutton devices for soft tissue femoral fixation in primary ACL reconstruction using the autogenous hamstring graft. Methods. We conducted our study in 48 patients admitted to our clinic, University Traumatology Clinic, Clinical Center "Mother Teresa", Skopje for ACL reconstruction from September 2009 to May 2013. The patients with ACL reconstruction were assigned as Rigidfix group (n=28), the second patients to Transfix group (n=13) and the third to Endobutton group (n=7). MRI of the knee joint was done prior to surgery. A data sheet, containing demographic data, examination findings and Tegner & Lysholm score, was completed for each patient. Results. Tegner & Lysholm the average scores before surgery were 2.52 and 34.75 (p>0.05). Six month after arthroscopy, the average value of Tegner and Lysholm scores in patients with ACL reconstruction was 8.37 and 89.08. Comparison among them showed that the operative mode of Endobutton femoral fixation had the highest level of the Lysholm score. Conclusions. Endobutton (Tight rope-RT) yielded a better outcome compared to the other two modes of femoral fixation in terms of instant stability of the graft and the general results.

No abstract

No abstract

INTRODUCTION:In the past distal tibia fractures, including intraarticular fractures, frequently led to poor functional outcomes. The Ruedi-Allgower four steps open method, and later the Patterson and Sirkin recommendations for delayed operative treatment has made a drastic advancement in the treatment of these fractures. The two-stage minimally-invasive protocol using locking plate fixation proved a historical turning point, improving functional results to the highest levels compared to all other methods.AIM:To present the superior results of the two-stage minimally-invasive method using locking plate fixation, making this a historic step forward in treating distal tibia fractures.MATERIAL AND METHODS:A prospective longitudinal study, collecting data from Traumatology-Clinic in the 2014-2016 periods, available for nine-month follow-up. Twenty-three patients were finally included in the study.RESULTS:In analysing the data collected, we focused our attention on the final functional outcomes as indicated by dorsiflexion nine months after injury and also according to the AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Scale. Results were excellent with no or minimal consequences. Where complications were present, these were benign and did not require further surgery.CONCLUSION:We believe this modern method for the treatment of distal tibia fractures should be applied routinely and considered as the gold standard in this domain.

Introduction: Management of degenerative lumbosacral spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis is still controversial. Surgery is widely used, as well as non-surgical treatment. Aim: To evaluate the clinical results and functional outcome after operative treatment in Grade II and III lumbar spine spondylolisthesis. Material and methods: Twelve patients with symptoms and image-confirmed degenerative spondylolisthesis entered the study. Mean patient age was 57 years. Spondylolisthesis Grade II or III, segment L4-L5 or L5-S1 were evaluated. All patients underwent similar protocols. Operative treatment was decompressive laminectomy, posterior one segment fixation, and fusion with autologous bone grafting. Functional outcome measures were Visual Analog Scale (VAS, 10-point scale) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI, 100-percent scale) after 6 and 12 months. Results: Patient follow-up was 12 months. Preoperatively, 7 patients had severe disability according to ODI, 4 had moderate disability. VAS measured 6 and 7 points in 6 patients, lowest score of 4 points and the highest score of 9. After 6 months, ODI showed 5 patients had minimal and 7 had moderate disability; 2 patients had 0 points on the VAS, 2 had a score of 1, 4 had a score of 2, highest score of 4 points. Treatment outcome effects after 1 year were 9 patients with minimal disability, 3 with moderate; VAS -2 patients with O points, 3 with 1 point, 4 with 2 points. Conclusion: Patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis treated surgically showed substantially greater improvement in pain and functional outcome during a period of 1 year.

The ilioinguinal approach (IIA) to the acetabulum has been used as a golden standard for fifty years to treat "anterior" acetabular fractures. Since its introduction by Hirvensalo and Cole, the anterior intrapelvic approach (AIPA) has been adopted by some surgeons, whilst others remain devoted to the IIA. IIA is routinely used in the Republic of Macedonia. The aim of this study is to present a review of literature for two different anterior approaches for the treatment of acetabular fractures used in modern day surgery, focussing on AIPA and its priorities and comparing it to IIA. We performed a search, mainly electronically, and retrospective analysis of existing literature. We have identified and selected two representative and well-systematized papers for IIA, and six for AIPA. We presented the advantages and disadvantages, priorities and weaknesses of both approaches separately, comparing complications, risks and results. Based on the facts presented regarding the advantages of AIPA with a focus on visualization, accessibility and biomechanical justification, the approach should be implemented in our everyday practice and we are comfortable in stating this preference, especially due to the fact that upon comparison of the complication rate there is no significant difference between the two approaches.

INTRODUCTION: An important feature of distal tibia fractures is the relevance of the soft tissue coverage. In order to maintain good functional outcome, several operative techniques have been established. Among them, percutaneous screw fixation has the advantage of causing less biological damage of the soft tissues with lower rates of complications.MATERIAL AND METHODS: We reviewed 16 patients with distal tibia fracture. Operative treatment consisted of indirect reduction and percutaneous fixation of the tibia followed by cast immobilization for approximately 3-4 months. Minimum follow up period was 12 months. Functional outcome was evaluated using Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot score (AOFAS).RESULTS: Twelve out of 16 fractures healed within 6 months of the injury. In 3 cases, delayed union was evident, but the fractures healed in less than nine months. There was one case of malunion, two cases of superficial skin infections, two cases of DVT and two cases of gross swelling. According to OMAS score, the functional result was excellent in 7 (43.75%), good in 5 (31.25%) and fair in 4 (25%) patients.CONCLUSION: Percutaneous screw fixation can be a safe and effective method for operative treatment of distal tibia fractures.