The relationship between ward social climate, ward sense of community and incidents of disruptive behaviour: A study of a high secure psychiatric sample
Background: Good reading skills are important for appropriate functioning in everyday life, scholastic performance, and the chances of acquiring a higher socioeconomic status. We conducted the first systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify possible deficits in specific reading skills in people with a variety of mental illnesses, including personality disorders. Methods: We performed a systematic search of databases (Academic Search Complete, CINAHL Plus, PsycInfo, PsycARTICLES, SocINDEX, MEDLINE, and PubMed) from inception until February 2020 and conducted random-effects meta-analyses. Results: The search yielded 34 studies with standardised assessments of reading skills in people with one or more mental illnesses. Of these, 19 studies provided data for the meta-analysis. Most studies (n=27; meta-analysis, n=17) were in people with schizophrenia and revealed large deficits in phonological processing (Hedge's g=-0.88, p<0.00001), comprehension (Hedge's g=-0.96, p<0.00001) and reading rate (Hedge's g=-1.22, p=0.002), relative to healthy controls; the single-word reading was less affected (Hedge's g=-0.70, p<0.00001). A few studies in affective disorders and non-forensic personality disorders suggested weaker deficits (for all, Hedge's g<-0.60). In forensic populations with personality disorders, there was evidence of marked phonological processing (Hedge's g=-0.85, p<0.0001) and comprehension deficits (Hedge's g=-0.95, p=0.0003). Conclusions: People with schizophrenia, and possibly forensic populations with personality disorders, demonstrate a range of reading skills deficits. Future studies are needed to establish how these deficits directly compare to those seen in developmental or acquired dyslexia and to explore the potential of dyslexia interventions to improve reading skills in these populations.
BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has had a substantial impact on forensic mental health service provision and implementation. This study aimed to provide an analysis of the impact of COVID-19 related restrictions on routine outcomes within a large forensic mental health service in London, UK.MethodWe conducted a longitudinal cohort study using data collected routinely prior to the COVID-19 pandemic (April 2018–March 2020) and then stages thereafter (March 2020–March 2021; analyzed as March–May 2020, June–September 2020, October–December 2020, January–March 2021). We used causal impact models (Bayesian structural time-series) to examine the effect of COVID-19 related changes on routine outcomes related to service provision and implementation.ResultsThere was an overall increase in long-term segregation (LTS) hours during the pandemic; 140%, (95% Cl 107, 171%) during Lockdown 1; 113%, (159% Cl 127, 192%) during post-Lockdown 1; 45% (95% Cl 23, 68%) during Lockdown 2 and, finally, 90% (95% Cl 63, 113%) during Lockdown 3. The most negative outcomes were evident during Lockdown 3. Incidents of violence were significantly more frequent during Lockdown 3 than would have been predicted based on pre-pandemic data, including physical assaults to service users (206%, 95% CI 57%, 346%), non-physical assaults to service users (206%, 95% CI 53%, 339%), and self-harm (71%, 95% CI 0.4%, 135%). Use of enforced medication also increased during Lockdown 3 (317%, 95% CI 175%, 456%).ConclusionThe pandemic and its related restrictions negatively affected some service outcomes. This resulted in increased incidents of violence and increased use of restrictive interventions, beyond what would have been expected had the pandemic not occurred.
This project evaluated the predictive validity of the Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression - Inpatient Version (DASA-IV) in a high-secure psychiatric hospital in the UK over 24 hours and over a single nursing shift. DASA-IV scores from three sequential nursing shifts over a 24-hour period were compared with the mean (average of three scores across the 24-hour period) and peak (highest of the three scores across the 24-hour period) scores across these shifts. In addition, scores from a single nursing shift were used to predict aggressive incidents over each of the following three shifts. The DASA-IV was completed by nursing staff during handover meetings, rating 43 male psychiatric inpatients over a period of 6 months. Data were compared to incident reports recorded over the same period. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and generalized estimating equations assessed the predictive ability of various DASA-IV scores over 24-hour and single-shift timescales. Scores from the DASA-IV based on a single shift had moderate predictive ability for aggressive incidents occurring the next calendar day, whereas scores based on all three shifts had excellent predictive ability. DASA-IV scores from a single shift showed moderate predictive ability for each of the following three shifts. The DASA-IV has excellent predictive ability for aggressive incidents within a secure setting when data are summarized over a 24-hour period, as opposed to when a single rating is taken. In addition, it has moderate value for predicting incidents over even shorter timescales.
Background
Individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders often experience less pleasure during social interaction and frequently demonstrate reduced social motivation. This research examines the extent to which these behaviours may be linked to reduced social reward reactivity and sensitivity, and aims to clarify whether schizophrenia spectrum traits are associated with reduced behavioural and neural responsiveness to social rewards. It includes a systematic review and meta-analyses of social reward sensitivity research in schizophrenia, and also provides preliminary data (participant n = 50) on a novel avatar-based social incentive delay task that was created to further investigate the links between schizophrenia spectrum traits and social reward reactivity.
Methods
First, a systematic review and meta-analyses (literature database search conducted November 2019) found six studies that investigated social reward anticipation and consumption within the schizophrenia continuum (total participant n = 440). Four investigated social reward sensitivity in clinical samples with schizophrenia diagnoses, and two studied the links between social anhedonia traits and social reward responding in normative samples. The novel social incentive delay task presents participants with the opportunity to win animated avatar-based monetary or social rewards by responding to a cued target.
Results
The narrative review and meta-analyses of behavioural data from clinical and normative samples found that individuals with schizophrenia diagnoses or traits demonstrate significantly reduced behavioural anticipation of social rewards in comparison to healthy controls. Furthermore, this reduced reward reactivity was more pronounced for social rewards than for monetary rewards. This effect was also mirrored at neural levels, with individuals with schizophrenia demonstrating reduced social reward-related activation in areas such as the ventral striatum and anterior cingulate cortex. Preliminary behavioural data from the social incentive delay task suggest that, in normative samples, more pronounced negative schizotypal traits are associated with reduced anticipation and consumption of social rewards. Like in the reviewed studies, this reduced anticipation was more marked for social rewards than for monetary rewards.
Discussion
This research suggests that schizophrenia spectrum traits are associated with reduced reactivity and sensitivity to social rewards. It also highlights that this reduced reactivity is demonstrated at behavioural and neural levels, and is more marked for social rewards than for monetary rewards. We consider the implications of these findings for treatment programmes that target atypical social behaviour within schizophrenia spectrum conditions. A series of methodological recommendations for future work investigating social reward reactivity in schizophrenia are also included.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.