BackgroundIn view of the long term discussion on the appropriateness of the dengue classification into dengue fever (DF), dengue haemorrhagic fever (DHF) and dengue shock syndrome (DSS), the World Health Organization (WHO) has outlined in its new global dengue guidelines a revised classification into levels of severity: dengue fever with an intermediary group of "dengue fever with warning sings", and severe dengue. The objective of this paper was to compare the two classification systems regarding applicability in clinical practice and surveillance, as well as user-friendliness and acceptance by health staff.MethodsA mix of quantitative (prospective and retrospective review of medical charts by expert reviewers, formal staff interviews), semi-quantitative (open questions in staff interviews) and qualitative methods (focus group discussions) were used in 18 countries. Quality control of data collected was undertaken by external monitors.ResultsThe applicability of the DF/DHF/DSS classification was limited, even when strict DHF criteria were not applied (13.7% of dengue cases could not be classified using the DF/DHF/DSS classification by experienced reviewers, compared to only 1.6% with the revised classification). The fact that some severe dengue cases could not be classified in the DF/DHF/DSS system was of particular concern. Both acceptance and perceived user-friendliness of the revised system were high, particularly in relation to triage and case management. The applicability of the revised classification to retrospective data sets (of importance for dengue surveillance) was also favourable. However, the need for training, dissemination and further research on the warning signs was highlighted.ConclusionsThe revised dengue classification has a high potential for facilitating dengue case management and surveillance.

Abstract. A prospective study on dengue (DEN) viruses was initiated in October 1995 in Gondokusuman kecamatan, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. This report presents data from the first year of the study. The studied cohort included all children 4-9 years of age living in the kecamatan. Blood samples for serology were collected from 1,837 children in October 1995 and again in October 1996. Blood samples for virus isolation and serology were collected from cohort children who were seen in municipal health clinics with febrile syndromes or admitted to hospitals with a provisional diagnosis of dengue hemorrhagic fever. Dengue serotype antibody prevalence and 1995-1996 infection rates were calculated using a single dilution (1:60) 70% plaque reduction endpoint neutralization test. Prevalence of dengue antibody at the beginning of the study was DEN 1 ϭ 12%, DEN 2 ϭ 16%, DEN 3 ϭ 2%, DEN 4 ϭ 4%, and two or more dengue infections ϭ 22%. Total dengue antibody prevalence increased from 38% in 4-year-old children to 69% in 9-year-old children. During the observation period, primary dengue infection rates were DEN 1 ϭ 4.8%, DEN 2 ϭ 7.7%, DEN 3 ϭ 4.2%, and DEN 4 ϭ 3.4%, while two or more dengue infections occurred in 6.7% of the study population. The secondary dengue infection rate was 19.0%. From febrile cases, all four dengue viruses were isolated with DEN 3 predominating. Seven children were hospitalized, including one fatal case with a hospital diagnosis of dengue shock syndrome. Based upon presence of antibody in the initial cohort bleeding and the serologic response both weeks and several months following illness, all had secondary dengue infections. Neutralizing antibody patterns in the initial cohort bleeding and in late convalescent serum samples permitted recognition of dengue infection sequence in five patients: DEN 2-DEN 1 (3), DEN 2-DEN 4 (1), DEN 1-DEN 3 (1), and none in the sequence DEN 1-DEN 2. In the total cohort 6.5% of the observed secondary infections were of the sequence DEN 2-DEN 1, while 4.9% were DEN 1-DEN 2, a highly pathogenic sequence in previous studies. Reduced pathogenic expression of secondary DEN 2 with enhanced pathogenic expression of secondary DEN 1 infections was an unexpected finding. Further studies will be required to understand the respective contributions to pathogenicity of antibody from initial dengue infections versus the biological attributes of the second infecting dengue viruses.The dengue (DEN) viruses (serotypes 1, 2, 3, and 4) are transmitted in nearly all tropical countries with a total population at risk in excess of 2.5 billion people.

Background: The burden of dengue continues to increase globally, with an estimated 100 million clinically apparent infections occurring each year. Although most dengue infections are asymptomatic, patients can present with a wide spectrum of clinical symptoms ranging from mild febrile illness through to severe manifestations of bleeding, organ impairment, and hypovolaemic shock due to a systemic vascular leak syndrome. Clinical diagnosis of dengue and identification of which patients are likely to develop severe disease remain challenging. This study aims to improve diagnosis and clinical management through approaches designed a) to differentiate between dengue and other common febrile illness within 72 h of fever onset, and b) among patients with dengue to identify markers that are predictive of the likelihood of evolving to a more severe disease course.

BackgroundDengue virus (DENV) infection is a major cause of acute febrile illness in Indonesia. Diagnostic inaccuracy may occur due to its varied and non-specific presentation. Characterization of DENV epidemiology, clinical presentation, and virology will facilitate appropriate clinical management and public health policy.Methodology/Principal findingsA multicenter observational cohort study was conducted in Indonesia to assess causes of acute fever requiring hospitalization. Clinical information and specimens were collected at enrollment, 14–28 days, and 3 months from 1,486 children and adults. Total of 468 (31.9%) cases of DENV infection were confirmed by reference laboratory assays. Of these, 414 (88.5%) were accurately diagnosed and 54 had been misdiagnosed as another infection by sites. One hundred initially suspected dengue cases were finally classified as ‘non-dengue’; other pathogens were identified in 58 of those cases. Mortality of DENV infection was low (0.6%). Prior DENV exposure was found in 92.3% of subjects >12 years. DENV circulated year-round in all cities, with higher incidence from January to March. DENV-3 and DENV-1 were the predominant serotypes. This study identified DENV-1 with TS119(C→T) substitution in the serotyping primer annealing site, leading to failure of serotype determination.Conclusions/SignificanceDENV is a common etiology of acute febrile illness requiring hospitalization in Indonesia. Diagnostic accuracy at clinical sites merits optimization since misdiagnosis of DENV infection and over-estimation of dengue can negatively impact management and outcomes. Mutation at the annealing site of the serotyping primer may confound diagnosis. Clinicians should consider following diagnostic algorithms that include DENV confirmatory testing. Policy-makers should prioritize development of laboratory capacity for diagnosis of DENV.

No abstract

Latar belakang. Infeksi virus dengue (IVD) bersifat akut dan dinamis, perjalanan klinisnya terkadang sulit diprediksi sehingga berakibat keterlambatan pengelolaan. Maka perlu diteliti parameter klinis dan laboratoris di fase kritis / defervescence untuk memprediksi derajat keparahan infeksi dengue. Tujuan. Mengetahui parameter klinis dan laboratoris sebagai faktor prognosis derajat keparahan infeksi dengue. Metode. Penelitian kohort retrospektif, menggunakan data rekam medik pasien anak IVD yang dirawat di RSUP Dr. Sardjito Yogyakarta dari Januari 2014 -Desember 2015. Faktor prognosis yang diteliti adalah usia, jenis kelamin, tanda klinis warning signs, serta laboratorium. Kriteria eksklusi adalah adanya penyakit hematologi dan penyakit jantung bawaan. Prognostic Factors for Dengue Infection SeverityArie Yulianto, Ida Safitri Laksono, Mohammad Juffrie Background. Dengue infection is an acute and dynamic disease. Progression of disease around the time of fever defervescence is essential to predict the clinical outcomes. The search for prognostic factors at the time of defervescence continues. Objective. To explore clinical findings and routine laboratory parameters, that could be used as prognostic factors for dengue infection severity. Methods. We conducted a retrospective cohort study in children who were admitted to Dr. Sardjito Hospital with dengue infection between 2014 and 2015. Patient characteristics of interest included sex, age, presence of WHO warning signs and laboratory parameters. Hematologic and congenital heart diseases were excluded from the study. The prognostic factors for dengue severity were analyzed by a multivariate logistic regression. Results. Of 188 eligible children, 56 (30%) were classified as dengue fever (DF), 58 (31%) with dengue hemorrhagic fever grade I -II (DHF), and 74 (39%) with dengue shock syndrome (DSS). Under multivariate logistic regression analysis, characteristics that increased the risk of DHF and DSS were; abdominal pain (OR, 5.06; 95% CI, 1.72-14.87), hepatomegaly > 2 cm (OR, 7.57; 95% CI, 2.86-20.02), hematocrit > 45% (OR, 5.10; 95% CI, 1.74-14.95), and platelet count ≤ 50.000/uL (OR, 17.80; 95% CI,. Conclusion. Presence of abdominal pain, hepatomegaly > 2 cm, hematocrit > 45% and platelet count ≤ 50.000/uL at the time of defervescence could be used as independent prognostic factors for dengue infection severity. Sari Pediatri 2016;18(3):198-203

Dengue is the most important arboviral infection of humans. Thrombocytopenia is frequently observed in the course of infection and haemorrhage may occur in severe disease. The degree of thrombocytopenia correlates with the severity of infection, and may contribute to the risk of haemorrhage. As a result of this prophylactic platelet transfusions are sometimes advocated for the prevention of haemorrhage. There is currently no evidence to support this practice, and platelet transfusions are costly and sometimes harmful. We conducted a global survey to assess the different approaches to the use of platelets in dengue. Respondents were all physicians involved with the treatment of patients with dengue. Respondents were asked that their answers reflected what they would do if they were the treating physician. We received responses from 306 physicians from 20 different countries. The heterogeneity of the responses highlights the variation in clinical practice and lack of an evidence base in this area and underscores the importance of prospective clinical trials to address this key question in the clinical management of patients with dengue.

BackgroundIntravenous artesunate and its follow on full course dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine are the standard treatment for severe malaria in Indonesia. The current policy suggests that intravenous and oral quinine could be used when standard therapy is not available. Its pragmatic use of both treatment combinations in a field hospital is evaluated.MethodsA retrospective study among hospitalized malaria patients receiving intravenous anti-malarial treatments at Mitra Masyarakat Hospital, Timika from April 2004 to December 2013 was conducted. The length of hospital stay (LoS) and the risk of malaria recurrence within 28 days after hospital admission were compared between patients receiving intravenous artesunate and oral dihydroartemisinin–piperaquine (Iv Art + DHP) and those receiving intravenous and oral quinine (Iv + Oral Qu).ResultsOf 10,514 patients requiring intravenous therapy, 2759 received Iv + Oral Qu and 7755 received Iv Art + DHP. Plasmodium falciparum infection accounted for 65.8% (6915), while Plasmodium vivax, Mixed infections, Plasmodium malariae and Plasmodium ovale were accounted for 17.0% (1789), 16.4% (1729), 0.8% (79) and 0.01% (2) of the infections, respectively. The majority of severe malaria hospital admissions were highland Papuans (78.0%, 8201/10,501). In total 49% (5158) of patients were older than 15 years and 3463 (32.9%) were children under 5 years old. The median LoS was shorter in patients receiving intravenous artesunate compared to those treated with intravenous quinine (median = 2 [IQR 1–3] versus 3 days [IQR 2–4], p < 0.0001). Patients treated with intravenous quinine had higher risk of being hospitalized longer than 2 days (aOR of 1.70 [95% CI 1.54–1.88], p < 0.0001). The risk of recurrences within 28 days after hospital admission was 1.94 times higher (95% CI aHR 1.57–2.39, p < 0.0001) in patients receiving intravenous quinine with follow on oral quinine treatment than in patients treated with DHP after intravenous artesunate therapy.ConclusionsIntravenous artesunate reduced the LoS of malaria patients and in combination with DHP reduced the risk of malaria recurrence within 28 days after hospital admission compared to those with Iv + Oral Qu treatment. Thus, ensuring continuous supply of intravenous artesunate and artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) should be a priority.