Ligation of inferior mesenteric vessels does not seem to affect anastomotic healing; both surgical techniques presented similar incidence of anastomotic bleeding. In this analysis, we could not identify any significant difference in overall morbidity and mortality.

No abstract

Background The benefit of a perianal block as an adjunct to general or regional anaesthesia is debated. This RCT aimed to compare pain at 24 h and up to 14 days after proctological surgery in patients with and without a perianal block. Methods Between January 2018 and April 2019, patients were allocated to receive a perianal block with ropivacaine or placebo as an adjunct to anaesthesia. Patients, surgeons and assessors were blinded. The primary outcome was pain measured on a numerical rating scale (NRS) after 24 h. Secondary outcomes were need for rescue analgesia, and pain after 1, 2, 3, 6 and 12 h. The mean, rest and maximum NRS scores were measured for 14 days. Results A total of 138 patients were included, of whom 46 and 44 received general anaesthesia with or without ropivacaine respectively, and 23 and 25 received spinal anaesthesia with or without ropivacaine respectively (P = 0·858). The mean NRS score differed significantly at 24 h (mean(s.d.) 1·1(0·1) versus 2·3(0·2); P < 0·001), but not at 1 h (1·4(0·2) versus 2·2(0·3); P = 0·051). The NRS score was lower with use of ropivacaine at 2 h (1·0(0·2) versus 1·6(0·2); P = 0·045), 3 h (0·9(0·2) versus 1·5(0·2); P = 0·022), 6 h (1·1(0·2) versus 1·8(0·2); P = 0·042) and 12 h (1·2(0·2) versus 1·8(0·2); P = 0·034). The use of oral morphine equivalents was 10·2(1·4) and 16·6(2·5) mg with and without ropivacaine respectively (P = 0·028). The mean and maximum NRS scores within 14 days were lower when ropivacaine was used (95 per cent c.i. for difference 0·14 to 0·49 (P = 0·002) and 0·39 to 0·63 (P < 0·001) respectively). There was no injection‐associated morbidity. Conclusion Perianal block as an adjunct to general or regional anaesthesia should be recommended for proctological surgery. It yields a reduction in pain, a reduced need for opioids, and a faster recovery with minimal risk of adverse events. Registration number: NCT03405922 ( http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Aim: Increasing attention has been given to postoperative gastrointestinal functional outcome and quality of life after sigmoid resection for diverticulitis. Conversely, very little has been described about postoperative urogenital functional outcome and even less about its potential relationship to the type of vascular approach. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether central ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) compared with peripheral dissection could impair urinary and sexual function in the long term.Method: Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticulitis from 2004 to 2017 were retrospectively analysed. They were asked to complete the American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUASI) questionnaire. Men received the five-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) questionnaire. Patients were then divided according to the type of vascular resection. Results:A response rate of the 36.4% to the AUASI and 43.8% to the IIEF-5 questionnaires was achieved. Three hundred and twenty four patients with a mean age of 62 ± 9.85 years were analysed for their urinary function (IMA preserved n = 217; IMA resected n = 107) in a median follow-up of 87 months. Furthermore, 115 men with a mean age of 60 ± 8.97 years were investigated for their sexual function (IMA preserved n = 80; IMA resected n = 35) in a median follow-up of 89 months. No difference (AUASI: 8 ± 6.32 IMA preserved vs. 7 ± 6.26

Introduction: Rectal mucoceles rarely occur and only a few cases are described in the literature. They usually appear after subtotal colectomy or Hartmann procedure originating from persisting rectal mucus production and simultaneous stenosis of the anal canal. Case Presentation: A 74-year-old female patient presented with the feeling of an abdominal growing mass. Complex medical history included a subtotal colectomy with an end ileostomy and a mucous fistula at the descending colon due to Crohn disease at the age of 16 years. MRI showed a massive dilatation of the remaining colon and the rectum. Endoscopy failed due to complete anal stenosis and stenosis of the descending colon at the stoma site. A total proctocolectomy was performed. The pathology report showed a dilated rectum and sigma with large amounts of partly calcified mucus. There was no evidence of dysplasia, malignancy, or Crohn manifestation in the completely obliterated proximal colon and the anus. Conclusion: Our case report underlines the importance of active endoscopic surveillance of the remaining colon and rectum in patients with diverting stomas and inflammatory bowel disease in order to detect stenosis. If endoscopic control is not possible due to obliteration, surgical therapy must be discussed due to the risk of developing cancer.