No abstract

| INTRODUC TI ONHelicobacter pylori infection of the gastric epithelial mucosa affects approximately 50% of the population worldwide. In developing countries, H pylori infection has been observed in more than 90% of the population because this infection remains asymptomatic in early childhood, resulting in an enormous economic burden on healthcare resources. 1,2 Standard triple antibiotic therapy (proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) in combination with two of the following: amoxicillin, clarithromycin, or metronidazole) has been the preferred initial approach for H pylori eradication. 3 However, due to increased resistance of H pylori to clarithromycin and/or metronidazole, the eradication rate with triple therapy has reduced to <70% presently, down from >90% observed in the 1990s. 4 In Japan, decreased eradication of H pylori with the Abstract Background: Probiotics are beneficial to patients with Helicobacter pylori infections by modulating the gut microbiota. Biofermin-R (BFR) is a multiple antibiotic-resistant lactic acid bacteria preparation of Enterococcus faecium 129 BIO 3B-R and is effective in normalizing the gut microbiota when used in combination with antibiotics. This study aimed to determine the effect of BFR in combination with vonoprazan (VPZ)based therapy on gut microbiota. Methods: Patients with positive urinary anti-H pylori antibody test (primary test) and fecal H pylori antigen test (secondary test) were examined. Patients in group 1 (BFR − )received VPZ (20 mg twice daily), amoxicillin (750 mg twice daily), and clarithromycin (400 mg twice daily) for 7 days. Patients in group 2 (BFR + ) received BFR (3 tablets/ day) for 7 days, in addition to the aforementioned treatments. Following treatment, the relative abundance, α-diversity, and β-diversity of gut microbiota were assessed.Results: Supplementation with BFR prevented the decrease in α-diversity after eradication therapy (Day 7). β-diversity was similar between groups. The incidence rate of diarrhea was non-significantly higher in the BFR − than in the BFR + group (73.1% vs 56.5%; P = .361). Stool consistency was comparable in the BFR + group on Days 7 and 1 (3.86 ± 0.95 vs 3.86 ± 1.46; P = .415). Conclusion:Biofermin-R combined with VPZ-based therapy resulted in higher microbial α-strain diversity and suppressed stool softening during H pylori eradication therapy. K E Y W O R D S Biofermin-R, gut microbiota, Helicobacter pylori, vonoprazan S U PP O RTI N G I N FO R M ATI O N Additional supporting information may be found online in the Supporting Information section. How to cite this article: Kakiuchi T, Mizoe A, Yamamoto K, et al. Effect of probiotics during vonoprazan-containing triple therapy on gut microbiota in Helicobacter pylori infection: A randomized controlled trial. Helicobacter. 2020;25:e12690.

No abstract

Currently, it is unclear whether treating Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is safe among adolescents. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of H. pylori eradication therapy by examining gut microbiota changes in adolescents 3 months after the therapy. H. pylori-infected adolescents were enrolled in this study. Their stool samples were collected at the following three time points: before treatment, 1–2 days after completion of treatment, and time of eradication successful judgment. We assessed the relative abundance, alpha-diversity, and beta-diversity of the gut microbiota and adverse events. The number of isolated Actinobacteria decreased immediately after eradication therapy in the 16 students included in the study, and it returned to pretreatment condition at the eradication judgment point. There was no change in the relative abundance at genus level. The alpha-diversity was lost immediately after eradication therapy; however, it recovered at the time of eradication judgment, and it was restored to pretreatment condition. Meanwhile, none of the participants experienced serious adverse events. H. pylori eradication therapy is safe for adolescents with respect to gut microbiota changes associated with H. pylori eradication therapy. Therefore, further long-term evaluations of gut microbiota changes following eradication therapy are warranted.

Summary: The purpose of the present study was to investigate, retrospectively, the clinical significance of treatments for extrahepatic metastasis after surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HOC). Forty-seven patients, in whom extrahepatic metastasis developed after hepatic resection or microwave coagulation therapy (MCT) for primary HCC, were enrolled in this study. Metastatic organs were lung (38 cases), bone (10 cases), brain (6 cases), adrenal gland (3 cases), and lymph nodes (9 cases), including duplicated cases. Twenty eight patients were treated with surgical resection, anticancer chemotherapy, radiation and immunotherapy for the extrahepatic metastasis (the treatment group). Nineteen patients were in no treatment except symptomatic therapy (the nontreatment group). The 1-and 3-year survival rates after development of extrahepatic metastasis in the treatment group were 42.3% and 17.8%, respectively. No patients in the non-treatment group survived more than 2 years. There was a significant difference between the treatment and the nontreatment group (p=0.0021) with regard to survival rate. Univariate analysis of the treatment group showed the following factors to be significant for survival: 1) intrahepatic lesion(s) was cleared or well controlled by some type of treatment, 2) the treatment for extrahepatic metastasis was effective, 3) extrahepatic metastasis was recognized in Grade A of Child-Pugh classification. Treatment of extrahepatic metastasis of HOC was of great significance for the prognosis.