The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of varying dietary forage particle size on chewing activity, ruminal mat characteristics, passage, and in situ ruminal and total tract digestion in dairy cows at a low- and high-concentrate inclusion. The experiment was designed as a 4 x 4 Latin square with a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of treatments. Four ruminally cannulated late-lactating dairy cows were restrictively fed (17 kg of dry matter/d), in four 23-d periods, 1 of 4 different diets varying in the theoretical particle size (6 and 30 mm) of hay (56.6% NDF of dry matter) and in the levels (approximately 20 and 60%, dry matter basis) of a cereal-based concentrate. Ingredients of the ration were offered separately to the cows; dietary hay and low-level concentrate were offered twice daily at 0800 and 1600 h, whereas concentrate of the high-level treatment was offered in 4 meals a day at 0800, 1200, 1600, and 1900 h. This study showed that altering the forage particle size from 6 to 30 mm in a low-concentrate diet significantly increased the rumination time and ruminal mat consistency without affecting ruminal fermentation and passage. Further, particle breakdown and proportion of mat in the rumen increased, and in situ hay dry matter degradability improved, which in turn indicated a higher capacity of ruminal digesta to degrade fiber. On the other hand, increasing the forage particle size in a diet containing a high amount of concentrate increased the proportion of dry matter retained on a 1.18-mm screen from 37.5 to 42.0% and extended the rumination time by 100 min/d, as well as increasing the ruminal mat consistency. However, ruminal particle breakdown, short-term ruminal pH, fibrolytic capacity of the digesta, and proportion of mat in the rumen decreased. This was also reflected in a higher bailable liquid pool, increased fractional passage rate of solid digesta from the reticulorumen, and increased retention time in the hindgut, which in turn indicated a shift of fiber digestion from the rumen to the lower digestive tract. This study showed that the response of chewing or ruminating activity alone seemed to be insufficient to assess the dietary physical effectiveness or fiber adequacy in limit-fed dairy cows when high-concentrate diets were fed separately. Based on the results of this study, we concluded that inclusion of coarsely chopped hay in the high-concentrate diet did not appear to further improve rumen conditions and digestion when the rations were formulated to exceed the fiber requirements in limit-fed dairy cows.
To examine the carry over of deoxynivalenol (DON) and its metabolite de-epoxy DON (DOM-1) in milk, lactating German Holstein cows (n = 13) were fed an isoenergetic total mixed ration in Period 1 with 50% concentrates and 5.3 mg DON/kg dry matter (DM) over 11 wk and were compared with control cows (n = 14). In Period 2 (18 wk), an elevated concentrate proportion was compared to a low concentrate ration by dividing the cows into four Groups (n = 8): Control-30 (30% concentrates), Myco-30 (30% concentrates, 4.4 mg DON/kg DM), Control-60 (60% concentrates) and Myco-60 (60% concentrates, 4.6 mg DON/kg DM). Taken both periods together, no unmetabolised DON was detected in milk samples using the HPLC-UV method. DOM-1 concentrations ranged between below the LOD and 3.2 microg/kg milk in mycotoxin fed cows, while control cows did not excrete any measurable amounts of DOM-1. Regarding the concentrate effects, the carry over of DON as DOM-1 in milk was negligible (between 0.0001 and 0.0011) but significantly higher in Group Myco-30 than in Group Myco-60. This effect may result from an altered bioavailability of DON from maize silage which made up a higher proportion of the daily ration.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.