Purpose It is not yet possible to estimate the number of cases required for a beginner to become expert in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. We estimated the learning curve of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for positive surgical margins compared to a published learning curve for open radical prostatectomy. Materials and Methods We reviewed records from 8,544 consecutive patients with prostate cancer treated laparoscopically by 51 surgeons at 14 academic institutions in Europe and the United States. The probability of a positive surgical margin was calculated as a function of surgeon experience with adjustment for pathological stage, Gleason score and prostate specific antigen. A second model incorporated prior experience with open radical prostatectomy and surgeon generation. Results Positive surgical margins occurred in 1,862 patients (22%). There was an apparent improvement in surgical margin rates up to a plateau at 200 to 250 surgeries. Changes in margin rates once this plateau was reached were relatively minimal relative to the CIs. The absolute risk difference for 10 vs 250 prior surgeries was 4.8% (95% CI 1.5, 8.5). Neither surgeon generation nor prior open radical prostatectomy experience was statistically significant when added to the model. The rate of decrease in positive surgical margins was more rapid in the open vs laparoscopic learning curve. Conclusions The learning curve for surgical margins after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy plateaus at approximately 200 to 250 cases. Prior open experience and surgeon generation do not improve the margin rate, suggesting that the rate is primarily a function of specifically laparoscopic training and experience.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Encouraged by the groups in Paris, we performed 145 laparoscopic radical prostatectomies between June 1999 and the end of November 2000. The indication for laparoscopic prostatectomy is the same as for open surgery: an organ-confined cancer. Previous abdominal surgery, transurethral resection, and/or relative adiposity are not considered to be contraindications for this laparoscopic procedure. The mean operating time was 255 min; the last 60 procedures took an average of 200 min. In no case was it necessary to convert to open surgery. Worthy of note was the low blood loss of 185 ml on average so that in 98% of the patients no blood transfusion was required. After completing the learning curve, the average indwelling catheter time was only 5.5 days. The postoperative complication rate was 11.7%, consisting mainly of minor complications. Also with regard to continence and potency, the results were representative. Postoperatively, 75%, 86%, 92%, and 93% of the patients were continent after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively. In our opinion, laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is an alternative to open prostatectomy, offering a number of advantages for the patient and surgeon as well.

No abstract