Encouraged by the groups in Paris, we performed 145 laparoscopic radical prostatectomies between June 1999 and the end of November 2000. The indication for laparoscopic prostatectomy is the same as for open surgery: an organ-confined cancer. Previous abdominal surgery, transurethral resection, and/or relative adiposity are not considered to be contraindications for this laparoscopic procedure. The mean operating time was 255 min; the last 60 procedures took an average of 200 min. In no case was it necessary to convert to open surgery. Worthy of note was the low blood loss of 185 ml on average so that in 98% of the patients no blood transfusion was required. After completing the learning curve, the average indwelling catheter time was only 5.5 days. The postoperative complication rate was 11.7%, consisting mainly of minor complications. Also with regard to continence and potency, the results were representative. Postoperatively, 75%, 86%, 92%, and 93% of the patients were continent after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively. In our opinion, laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is an alternative to open prostatectomy, offering a number of advantages for the patient and surgeon as well.
Management of staghorn calculi is still a challenge. To combine the surgical principles of treatment with the minimal invasive access we performed a laparoscopic anatrophic nephrolithotomy in a female patient successfully. Patient was discharged free of stone on fifth postoperative day. No complications occurred.
Tetrastarch sustains pulmonary gas exchange during experimental systemic inflammation more effectively than saline and pentastarch by protecting the diffusion distance and the size of the microvascular gas exchange surface. Improved capillary perfusion resulting from tetrastarch therapy, which is typically applied to increase blood pressure, may according to the Ohm's law locally decrease hydrostatic perfusion pressures in the pulmonary microvasculature during systemic inflammation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.