Reuter lsl Knowledge atau di lndonesia's maritime connectivity development domestic and international challenges

The existing literature on Indonesia's foreign policy has excluded the state from the category of an agent which shapes the country's external a airs. This trend certainly ignores the notion that foreign policy is a unique state activity taking place in the interface between domestic and international politics. To ll the gap, this article explores the idea about the family state and looks at its in uence on the conduct of Indonesia's international relations. The argument is that the family state pursues order in international society in which sovereignty can be maintained. Indonesia plays the role of an order-maker in Southeast Asia through the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN). The order-oriented actions are displayed by Jakarta's diplomacy to  Listen   Full Article  Log in | Register   In this article  PDF at o s (S). e o de o e ted act o s a e d sp ayed by Ja a ta s d p o acy to resolve border disputes with neighbouring countries in the region.

Halaman 74t-759 htl.os i / / d oi. o r p I LO.1OSO I 09 5 L27 48.2O L5. lO 47 467 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10. 1080/ 09 5 127 48.20 t5. LO47 467 https://www.scimasoir.com/iou rnalsearch.php?q=8032 1&tip= sid&clean=0 O, oP 2s19 = Q99 llmiah lnternasional Bereputasi (SJR > 0,1) llmiah Internasional Bereputasi (SJR < 0,1) llmiah Internasional surabaya,

No abstract

While the rise and political implications of populism in Southeast Asia have received significant academic attention, the impact of populist ideology on foreign policy remains understudied. This article tries to narrow the gap by presenting a case study of Indonesia under the first tenure of President Joko Widodo (Jokowi), 2014-2019. Drawing on the ideational dimensions of populism, which centers on the anti-elitist characteristic of populist leaders, it proposes three sets of hypotheses. The main expected elements are: an anti-elitist stance and a perception of the victimization of the people; a perception about threatening outsiders; and a pro-people style of communication in the conduct of diplomacy. The empirical findings demonstrate that the substance or objective of Jokowi's foreign policy does not confirm the anti-elitist and hostile view of foreigners, although longstanding nationalism remains to dominate Indonesia's foreign policy. Jokowi's technocratic populism's intervention is more effective in introducing and altering the processes and forms of diplomacy, suggesting closer linkages between foreign policy and ordinary citizens.