The objective of the study was to derive a mathematical method for calculating the entrance surface dose (ESD) from exposure factors for all tube potentials used in clinical practice and to compare the calculated ESDs (ESD(C)) with those measured (ESD(TLD)) using thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLDs). The exposure parameters of 43 patients who underwent (a) posteroanterior (PA) and lateral (LAT) chest examination (13 patients), (b) supine abdomen (10 patients), (c) erectus abdomen (10 patients), or (d) urinary tract examination (10 patients) were recorded. Patient ESD was directly measured by TLDs and calculated from exposure factors. The differences between ESD(C) and ESD(TLD) were quite small and could be explained by the uncertainties involved in both methods, in all but the PA chest examination where the ESD(C) was about 50% larger than ESD(TLD). However, in PA chest the ESD(TLD) was close to the minimum detectable dose of TLDs, questioning the accuracy of ESD(TLD). Further investigation showed that using the high tube potential technique (130 kV) in the PA chest examination resulted in very short exposure times, in the region of 4 ms. In such short exposure times, the X-ray generator operation presented stability problems that led to loss of output linearity and consequently to false calculation of ESD. The calculation method offers a reliable and cheap alternative to the measurement of ESD by TLD, provided that the exposure times are not as short as in the PA chest examinations recorded in this study, so that the output linearity with tube current-time product (mAs) is maintained.
Coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) radiation doses were investigated in a recently founded Interventional Cardiology (IC) department. The study includes 336 procedures (177 CAs and 159 PTCAs) carried out with a Philips digital flat detector monoplane system. Patient dose was measured in terms of kerma-area product (KAP) and cumulative dose. Using appropriate conversion factors, peak skin dose (PSD) and effective dose (E) were estimated. Median values of KAP (Gy cm(2)), PSD (mGy) and E (mSv) were: 34 478 and 6.1, respectively for CA and 80 885 and 14.4 for PTCA, within European and international reference levels. Only 1.5 % of patients received radiation dose over the 2 Gy threshold (PTCA procedures) for deterministic effects and none reported any skin effect. Radiation doses were within international standards and comparable with other radiological examinations. The percentage of the high-risk patients for radiation skin effects is extremely low.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.