PurposeThe purpose of the Korean Frailty and Aging Cohort Study (KFACS) is to initiate a nationwide, population-based prospective cohort study of older adults living in the community to assess their frailty status and explore transitions between frailty states over time in Korea.ParticipantsThe KFACS is a multicentre longitudinal study with the baseline survey conducted from May 2016 to November 2017. Each centre recruited participants using quota sampling stratified by age and sex. The number of participants recruited through 2 years of baseline study from 10 centres was 3014, with each site accounting for approximately 300 participants. The inclusion criteria were: having an age of 70–84 years, currently living in the community, having no plans to move out in the next 2 years, having no problems with communication and no prior dementia diagnosis.Findings to dateTo define physical frailty, the KFACS used a modified version of the Fried Frailty Phenotype (FFP) consisting of five components of frailty: unintended weight loss, weakness, self-reported exhaustion, slowness and low physical activity. In the baseline study of 2016–2017, 2907 of 3014 individuals fulfilled all five components of FFP. The results indicated that 7.8% of the participants (n=228) were frail, 47.0% (n=1366) were prefrail and 45.2% (n=1313) were robust. The prevalence of frailty increased with age in both sexes; in the group aged 70–74 years, 1.8% of men and 3.7% of women were frail, whereas in the 80–84 years age group, 14.9% of men and 16.7% of women were frail. Women tended to exhibit a higher prevalence of frailty than men in all age groups.Future plansThe KFACS plans to identify outcomes and risk factors associated with frailty by conducting a 10-year cohort study, with a follow-up every 2 years, using 3014 baseline participants.
TrP and paraspinal dry needling is suggested to be a better method than TrP dry needling only for treating myofascial pain syndrome in elderly patients.
IntroductionMyofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a common cause of musculoskeletal pain characterised by trigger points (MTrPs), that is tender loci in taut bands of skeletal muscle, limited range of motion in joints, referred pain and local twitch responses (LTRs) during mechanical stimulation of the MTrPs. 1 Inactivation of MTrPs is essential in managing MPS and several methods have been recommended. The treatments most commonly used for this purpose are dry needling of the MTrPs, injection treatments with local anaesthetics or saline, sprays, and stretching. 2According to the results of several studies, injection continues to be the most effective choice for treatment. The superiority of local injection or dry needling for the inactivation of MTrPs is controversial, [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] and hollow needles were used for dry needling in these studies. 2;6 Gunn suggests that the 'hollow needle' induces more tissue injury and is more painful than a 'pointed-tip needle '. 9 In this single-blinded randomised trial, we compared the efficacies and adverse events of acupuncture needling and 0.5% lidocaine injection of trigger points in myofascial pain syndrome. Method ParticipantsWe obtained retrospective ethical approval from the institutional review board of Inha University Hospital. We selected 40 subjects with chronic MPS of the upper trapezius from volunteers at four communitybased facilities; one further subject proved unable to complete the necessary forms. Subjects were selected on the basis of physical examination and interview, and signed informed consent was obtained. Participants were randomised into two groups by coin-toss: 1) ACU (acupuncture needling) group and 2) TPI (trigger point injection with 0.5% lidocaine) group.Inclusion criteria for the trial were 1) aged more than 60 years old; 2) complaining of chronic shoulder AbstractAim To compare the efficacy of acupuncture needling and 0.5% lidocaine injection of trigger points in myofascial pain syndrome of elderly patients. Methods Thirty nine participants with myofascial pain syndrome of one or both upper trapezius muscles were randomised to treatment with either acupuncture needling (n=18) or 0.5% lidocaine injection (n=21) at all the trigger points on days 0, 7 and 14, in a single-blinded study. Pain scores, range of neck movement, pressure pain intensity and depression were measured up to four weeks from the first treatment. Results Local twitch responses were elicited at least once in 94.9% of all subjects. Both groups improved, but there was no significant difference in reduction of pain in the two groups at any time point up to one month. Overall, the range of cervical movement improved in both groups, apart from extension in the acupuncture needling group. Changes in depression showed only trends. Conclusion There was no significant difference between acupuncture needling and 0.5% lidocaine injection of trigger points for treating myofascial pain syndrome in elderly patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.