2020
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Korean frailty and aging cohort study (KFACS): cohort profile

Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of the Korean Frailty and Aging Cohort Study (KFACS) is to initiate a nationwide, population-based prospective cohort study of older adults living in the community to assess their frailty status and explore transitions between frailty states over time in Korea.ParticipantsThe KFACS is a multicentre longitudinal study with the baseline survey conducted from May 2016 to November 2017. Each centre recruited participants using quota sampling stratified by age and sex. The number of participants … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
121
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
121
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…22) With KFACS as the first Korean multicenter prospective cohort on frailty, the significance of the present study is that it uses the nationwide distributions of frailty and low SPPB to produce corresponding TUG cut points. 17) Although many validated screening questionnaires exist for frailty, [23][24][25] subjective factors such as examiners' skill or perception and patients' prejudice regarding their health status may influence the results of these tools as these are measured using self-reported questionnaires. Alternatively, more objective and multifaceted assessments using the components of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA), which is considered to be the criterion standard for evaluating frailty, sometimes require more than 30 minutes to complete.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…22) With KFACS as the first Korean multicenter prospective cohort on frailty, the significance of the present study is that it uses the nationwide distributions of frailty and low SPPB to produce corresponding TUG cut points. 17) Although many validated screening questionnaires exist for frailty, [23][24][25] subjective factors such as examiners' skill or perception and patients' prejudice regarding their health status may influence the results of these tools as these are measured using self-reported questionnaires. Alternatively, more objective and multifaceted assessments using the components of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA), which is considered to be the criterion standard for evaluating frailty, sometimes require more than 30 minutes to complete.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poor grip strength was defined as the lower 20th percentile of grip strength (maximal grip strength in kg after measuring twice for each hand using a hand grip dynamometer [T.K.K.5401; Takei Scientific Instruments Co., Tokyo, Japan]), stratified by sex and body mass index (BMI) quartiles based on the KFACS baseline survey. 17 ) To quantify exhaustion, we used the following statements from the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) scale for 3 or more days in a week: “I felt that everything I did was an effort” or “I could not get going”. 18 ) For slowness, we used the lowest 20% of a 4-m gait speed stratified by sex and height based on KFACS data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the ndings of the current study indicate a negative relationship between female gender and frailty. [22] The reason for this could be due to unequal gender distribution especially after 80 years of age (20 women vs 9 men). A statistically signi cant association has been found in this study between vegetarian diet and frailty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cut-off values for grip strength and gait speed of the five components were suggested by Fried based on the Cardiovascular Health Study [ 11 ]. Won et al [ 12 ] suggested criteria for frailty among Korean older adults based on data of Korean Frailty and Aging Cohort Study as follows ( Table 1 ) [ 13 ].…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Frailtymentioning
confidence: 99%