bioMérieux.

Background The deployment of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) teams to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic can lead to a loss of developed frameworks, best practices and leadership resulting in adverse impact on antimicrobial prescribing and resistance. We aim to investigate effects of reduction in AMS resources during the COVID-19 pandemic on antimicrobial prescribing. Methods One of 5 full-time equivalent AMS pharmacists was deployed to support pandemic work and AMS rounds with infectious disease physicians were reduced from 5 to 2 times a week. A survey in acute inpatients was conducted using the Global Point Prevalence Survey methodology in July 2020 and compared with those in 2015 and 2017–2019. Results The prevalence of antimicrobial prescribing (55% in 2015 to 49% in 2019 and 47% in 2020, p = 0.02) and antibacterials (54% in 2015 to 45% in 2019 and 42% in 2020, p < 0.01) have been reducing despite the pandemic. Antimicrobial prescribing in infectious disease wards with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 cases was 29% in 2020. Overall, antimicrobial prescribing quality indicators continued to improve (e.g. reasons in notes, 91% in 2015 to 94% in 2019 and 97% in 2020, p < 0.01) or remained stable (compliance to guideline, 71% in 2015 to 62% in 2019 and 73% in 2020, p = 0.08). Conclusion During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was no increase in antimicrobial prescribing and no significant differences in antimicrobial prescribing quality indicators.

Severe Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is associated with poorer outcomes. We aimed to identify risk factors and treatment outcomes of severe CDI. This was a retrospective cohort study. Eligible patients from January to December 2012 were recruited. Severity definitions were in accordance with SHEA/IDSA 2010 guideline. Treatment outcomes were (1) diarrhoea persistence, (2) CDI recurrence, (3) major complications despite treatment and (4) 30-day mortality. Two hundred and seventy-two patients were included and 40% had severe CDI. High APACHE II score (aOR 1.112, 95% CI 1.014–1.219; p < 0.05), high C-reactive protein (aOR 1.011; 95% CI 1.004–1.019; p < 0.01) and carbapenem usage in past 90 days (aOR 3.259; 95% CI 1.105–9.609; p < 0.05) were independent risk factors of severe CDI. Majority received oral metronidazole as sole treatment (92.6% for mild-moderate, 83.9% for severe, 77% for severe-complicated). Diarrhoea persistence was 32% versus 50% (p < 0.01), CDI recurrence 16.6% versus 16.5% (p > 0.05), major complications 1.2% versus 11% (p < 0.001) and 30-day mortality 7.4% versus 20.2% (p < 0.01) in mild-moderate CDI and severe CDI groups respectively. Oral metronidazole for severe CDI was associated with persistent diarrhoea, major complications and mortality. Risk factors for severe CDI can guide doctors in diagnosing severe CDI earlier and instituting oral vancomycin treatment to improve outcomes from severe CDI.

No abstract

Strategies to limit the negative effects of antibiotics on the gut microbiota include restricting the duration and spectrum of antibiotic use. Different routes of antibiotic administration have varying effects on the gut microbiota due to pharmacokinetic parameters, and these effects should be considered. There is insufficient evidence to recommend the routine use of selective oral decontamination and selective digestive decontamination to reduce the risks of nosocomial pneumonia in critically ill patients. The use of fecal microbiota transplants and probiotics have some role in restoring the gut microbiota diversity in the setting of dysbiosis, but require further study. Gut microbiota profiling through metataxonomic analysis may provide further insight into modulating microbial communities in the context of infection prevention and control.