Currently, link recommendation has gained more attention as networked data becomes abundant in several scenarios. However, existing methods for this task have failed in considering solely the structure of dynamic networks for improved performance and accuracy. Hence, in this work, we present a methodology based on the use of multiple topological metrics in order to achieve prospective link recommendations considering time constraints. The combination of such metrics is used as input to binary classification algorithms that state whether two pairs of authors will/should define a link. We experimented with five algorithms, what allowed us to reach high rates of accuracy and to evaluate the different classification paradigms. Our results also demonstrated that time parameters and the activity profile of the authors can significantly influence the recommendation. In the context of DBLP, this research is strategic as it may assist on identifying potential partners, research groups with similar themes, research competition (absence of obvious links), and related work.
The use of graph theory for analyzing network-like data has gained central importance with the rise of the Web 2.0. However, many graph-based techniques are not welldisseminated and neither explored at their full potential, what might depend on a complimentary approach achieved with the combination of multiple techniques. This paper describes the systematic use of graph-based techniques of different types (multimodal) combining the resultant analytical insights around a common domain, the Digital Bibliography & Library Project (DBLP). To do so, we introduce an analytical ensemble based on statistical (degree, and weakly-connected components distribution), topological (average clustering coefficient, and effective diameter evolution), algorithmic (link prediction/machine learning), and algebraic techniques to inspect non-evident features of DBLP at the same time that we interpret the heterogeneous discoveries found along the work. As a result, we have put together a set of techniques demonstrating over DBLP what we call multimodal analysis, an innovative process of information understanding that demands a wide technical knowledge and a deep understanding of the data domain. We expect that our methodology and our findings will foster other multimodal analyses and also that they will bring light over the Computer Science research.
Abstract:Crowdsourcing solutions can be helpful to extract information from disaster-related data during crisis management. However, certain information can only be obtained through similarity operations. Some of them also depend on additional data stored in a Relational Database Management System (RDBMS). In this context, several works focus on crisis management supported by data. Nevertheless, none of them provide a methodology for employing a similarity-enabled RDBMS in disaster-relief tasks. To fill this gap, we introduce a methodology together with the Data-Centric Crisis Management (DCCM) architecture, which employs our methods over a similarity-enabled RDBMS. We evaluate our proposal through three tasks: classification of incoming data regarding current events, identifying relevant information to guide rescue teams; filtering of incoming data, enhancing the decision support by removing near-duplicate data; and similarity retrieval of historical data, supporting analytical comprehension of the crisis context. To make it possible, similarity-based operations were implemented within one popular, open-source RDBMS. Results using real data from Flickr show that our proposal is feasible for real-time applications. In addition to high performance, accurate results were obtained with a proper combination of techniques for each task. Hence, we expect our work to provide a framework for further developments on crisis management solutions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.