2014 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communication Workshops (PERCOM WORKSHOPS) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/percomw.2014.6815268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supervised-learning link recommendation in the DBLP co-authoring network

Abstract: Currently, link recommendation has gained more attention as networked data becomes abundant in several scenarios. However, existing methods for this task have failed in considering solely the structure of dynamic networks for improved performance and accuracy. Hence, in this work, we present a methodology based on the use of multiple topological metrics in order to achieve prospective link recommendations considering time constraints. The combination of such metrics is used as input to binary classification al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the prospective of learning to rank [23], supervised friend recommendation approaches can be divided into pointwise learning, pairwise learning and listwise learning methods. Pointwise learning models transfer the sorting problem into a multi-classification problem or a regression problem [11], [12], and the disadvantage is that these models cannot deal with the high skewness of data very well. Pairwise learning models treat friend recommendation as a learning to rank problem based upon pairwise comparisons [14], [19], [24]- [26], [43].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the prospective of learning to rank [23], supervised friend recommendation approaches can be divided into pointwise learning, pairwise learning and listwise learning methods. Pointwise learning models transfer the sorting problem into a multi-classification problem or a regression problem [11], [12], and the disadvantage is that these models cannot deal with the high skewness of data very well. Pairwise learning models treat friend recommendation as a learning to rank problem based upon pairwise comparisons [14], [19], [24]- [26], [43].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, we select 3 − core authors [11] from all authors, i.e. the authors who had published at least three papers during the training and the test intervals, respectively.…”
Section: Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do this by means of link recommendation techniques together with measures of accuracy. Here we verify this property by extracting metrics from the co-authoring network of DBLP; specifically, for each author we extract Number of common authors (a), Jaccard's coefficient (b), Preferential attachment (c), Adamic-Adar coefficient (d), Resource allocation index (f), and Local path (g) -please check the work of Gimenes et al [7] for details. These metrics are then used with supervised machine learning classifiers [19] J48, Naïve Bayes, Multilayer Perceptron, Bagging, and Random Forest, all of them available in the Weka framework, developed by the University of Waikato [5].…”
Section: Co-authoring Predictabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors have compared different traditional classifiers including decision trees, support vector machines, k-nearest neighbors, multi-layer perceptrons, naïve Bayes, and others, as well as different ensembles of these classifiers (HASAN et al, 2006;BENCHETTARA;KANAWATI;ROUVEIROL, 2010;LUSSIER;CHAWLA, 2010;FIRE et al, 2011;FIRE et al, 2014;GIMENES et al, 2014). Other authors have obtained good results using random forest classifiers (CUKIERSKI; HAMNER; YANG, 2011), or using classifiers The main challenge that link prediction methods based on classifiers has to deal with is the well-known class imbalance problem.…”
Section: A Classifier-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%