Al(C6F5)3/R3P [R = tert-butyl (tBu), mesityl (Mes), naphthyl (Nap)] frustrated Lewis pairs react with N2O to form species having the formula R3P(N2O)Al(C6F5)3, which react with additional alane to generate proposed frustrated radical ion pairs formulated as [R3P·][(μ-O·)(Al(C6F5)3)2] that can activate C-H bonds. For R = tBu, C-H activation of a tBu group affords [tBu2PMe(C(CH2)Me)][(μ-OH)(Al(C6F5)3)2]. In the case of R = Mes, the radical cation salt [Mes3P·][(μ-HO)(Al(C6F5)3)2] is isolated, while for R = Nap, the activation of toluene and bromobenzene gives [(Nap)3PCH2Ph][(μ-OH)(Al(C6F5)3)2] and [(Nap)3PC6H4Br][(μ-HO)(Al(C6F5)3)2], respectively.

The catalytic dehydrocoupling reaction of Me(2)NHBH(3) with Al(NMe(2))(3) gives the dimer [Me(2)NBH(2)](2) and the chain [(Me(2)N)(2)BH], involving the thermally-stable Al(III) hydride catalyst [{(Me(2)N)(2)BH(2)}(2)AlH].

Formation of radical–radical cocrystals is an important step towards the design of organic ferrimagnets. We describe a simple approach to generate radical–radical cocrystals through the identification and implementation of well‐defined supramolecular synthons which favor cocrystallization over phase separation. In the current paper we implement the structure‐directing interactions of the E−E bond (E=S, Se) of dithiadiazolyl (DTDA) and diselenadiazolyl (DSDA) radicals to form close contacts to electronegative groups. This is exemplified through the preparation and structural characterization of three sets of radical cocrystals; the 2:2 cocrystal [PhCNSSN]2[MBDTA]2 (4) [MBDTA=methyl benzodithiazolyl] and the 2:1 cocrystals [C6F5CNEEN]2[TEMPO] (E=S, 5; E=Se, 6). In 4 the two types of radical are linked via bifurcated inter‐dimer δ+S⋅⋅⋅Nδ− interactions whereas 5 and 6 exhibit a set of five‐centre δ+E⋅⋅⋅Oδ− contacts (E=S, Se).

Attempts to coordinate neutral ligands to low oxidation state indium centers are often hindered by disproportionation pathways that produce elemental indium and higher oxidation state species. In contrast, we find that reactions of the salt, InOTf (OTf=trifluoromethanesulfonate), with α-diimine ligands yielded intensely colored compounds with no evidence of decomposition. X-ray structural analysis of InOTf⋅(Mes) DAB(Me) ((Mes) DAB(Me) =N,N-dimesityl-2,3-dimethyl-diazabutadiene; 1) reveals a discrete molecular compound with a pyramidal coordination environment at the indium center, consistent with the presence of a stereochemically active lone pair of electrons on indium and a neutral diazabutadiene chelate ligand. The use of the less-electron-rich (Mes) DAB(H) ligand ((Mes) DAB(H) =N,N-dimesityl-diazabutadiene) engenders dramatically different reactivity and produces a metallopolymer (InOTf⋅(Mes) DAB(H) )∞ (2) linked via CC and InIn bonds. The difference in reactivity is rationalized by cyclic voltammetry and DFT studies that suggest more facile electron transfer from In(I) to the (Mes) DAB(H) and bis(aryl)acenaphthenequinonediimine (BIAN) ligands. Solution EPR spectroscopy indicates the presence of non-interacting ligand-based radicals in solution, whereas solid-state EPR studies reflect the presence of a thermally accessible spin triplet consistent with reversible CC bond cleavage.

High loading of the radical PhCNSSN˙ (1) into faujasite has been achieved via gas phase diffusion. Whilst the large 12 Å pores can accommodate the enthalpically preferred dimer, the smaller pores dictate inclusion as a paramagnetic monomer. Powder X-ray diffraction studies reveal the host framework is unchanged whilst TGA reveal that the void space has high radical loadings. SQUID magnetometry coupled with EPR spectroscopy indicate that the majority of radicals adopt diamagnetic π*-π* dimers consistent with predominant location of 1 as dimers within the large cavities.