Background:Dexmedetomidine (Dex), as an adjuvant, has been reported to prolong the duration of spinal analgesia when adding to local anesthetic. We hypothesized that Dex could enhance the efficiency of intrathecal bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia in cesarean section. The aim of his study is to test our hypothesis that 5 μg Dex could enhance the efficiency of intrathecal bupivacaine and reduce the dose requirement of spinal bupivacaine for patients undergoing cesarean section.Methods:Ninety patients with ASA I or II, who underwent cesarean section, were randomized into 2 groups: group D (bupivacaine + 5 μg Dex) and group C (bupivacaine + the same volume of saline). The subsequent dose of spinal bupivacaine was determined by the improved up–down allocation method. The initial dose of bupivacaine in the 2 groups was 4 mg, and the subsequent dose for the following patient was depended on the probability of the current dose. ED95 of spinal bupivacaine was calculated using logistic regression model.Results:The ED95 and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of spinal hyperbaric bupivacaine in group D and group C were 7.4 mg (95% CI, 5.6–12.4 mg) and 11.0 mg (95% CI, 4.4–56.8 mg), respectively. The duration of sensory block was 120.5 ± 37.0 minutes in Dex group and 70.5 ± 34.5 minutes in Control group, respectively (P < .05). The duration of analgesia was 230.5 ± 40.5 minutes in Dex group and 145.1 ± 28.5 minutes in Control group, respectively (P < .001). The consumption of postoperative rescued sufentanil was significantly lower in Dex group than in the Control group (56.3 ± 9.4 vs 65.9 ± 10.7 μg). There was not significantly different in the patient satisfaction of analgesia, incidence of side effects, neonatal outcomes and neurological deficit between the 2 groups.Conclusion:Intrathecal 5 μg Dex enhances the efficacy of spinal bupivacaine by 24% in patients undergoing cesarean section with spinal anesthesia. No additional side effect was observed by adding spinal Dex.
BACKGROUND: Ondansetron has been shown to reduce the incidence of hypotension and vasopressor requirement during spinal anesthesia for obstetric and nonobstetric surgery. However, the magnitude of this effect has not been fully quantified. In this parallel-group, randomized, double-blinded study, we determined the effective dose in 50% of subjects (ED50) of a prophylactic phenylephrine infusion for preventing hypotension in patients who received a single dose of intravenous ondansetron 4 mg or saline control before combined spinal–epidural anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. ED50 values obtained were compared to estimate the effect of ondansetron versus placebo on vasopressor requirement. METHODS: Sixty parturients were randomly assigned to receive ondansetron (group O) or saline control (group C) 10 minutes before positioning for induction of spinal anesthesia. A prophylactic phenylephrine infusion was used to prevent hypotension. The first patient in each group received a phenylephrine infusion at the rate of 0.5 µg/kg/min. The infusion rate for each subsequent patient was varied with increments or decrements of 0.05 µg/kg/min based on the response of the previous patient, and the effective dose of the phenylephrine infusion for preventing hypotension in 50% of patients (ED50) was calculated for each group and compared using up-down sequential analysis. Probit regression was applied as a backup and sensitivity analysis was used to compare ED50 values for phenylephrine between groups by comparing calculated relative mean potency. RESULTS: The ED50 (mean [95% confidence interval (CI)]) of the rate of phenylephrine infusion was lower in group O (0.24 µg/kg/min [0.10–0.38 µg/kg/min]) compared with group C (0.32 µg/kg/min [0.14–0.47 µg/kg/min]) (P < .001). The total consumption of phenylephrine (mean ± standard deviation [SD]) until delivery was lower in group O (316.5 ± 25.9 µg) than in group C (387.7 ± 14.7 µg, P = .02). The estimate of relative median potency for phenylephrine for group O versus group C was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.37–0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Under the conditions of this study, intravenous ondansetron 4 mg reduced the ED50 of a prophylactic phenylephrine infusion by approximately 26% in patients undergoing cesarean delivery under combined spinal–epidural anesthesia.
The magnolia tea has been used in traditional oriental medicine for multiple purposes including sleep aid. Postpartum depression is a mental illness that adversely affects the health and well‐being of many families with newborns. Given the known effectiveness and relative safety, herein we aimed to investigate whether magnolia tea has a palliative effect on postpartum depression. The qualified participants were randomly assigned to the intervention group or the control group. The participants in the intervention group drunk magnolia tea, while the control group received regular postpartum care only. The outcome variables including Postpartum Sleep Quality Scale (PSQS), Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), and Postpartum Fatigue Scale (PFS) were assessed and compared. In comparison with the control group, the intervention group demonstrated significant difference for physical‐symptom‐related sleep inefficiency (PSQS Factor 2) at 3 weeks post‐test (t = −2.10, p = .03). The comparison results also revealed significant differences for PFS at both 3 weeks post‐test (t = −2.02, p = .04) and 6 weeks post‐test (t = −1.99, p = .04). Further, magnolia tea intervention significantly alleviated the symptoms of depression, reflected by the EPDS scores at 3 weeks post‐test (t = −2.38, p = .02) and 6 weeks post‐test (t = −2.13, p = .02). Our trial results suggested that drinking single‐ingredient magnolia tea for a 3‐week duration has positive effects on postpartum women. Magnolia tea is recommended as a supplementary approach to ameliorate sleep quality of postpartum women, while alleviating their symptoms of depression.
Background Preeclampsia (PE) is a pregnancy-specific syndrome, belongs to the gestational hypertension diseases category and is considered among the causes of maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity. However, the pathogenesis of PE is still vague. Methods In the present study, the circular RNA (circRNA) expression patterns of normal pregnant women and PE patients were investigated using whole RNA sequencing. Results A total of 151 differential expressed circRNAs were identified including 121 upregulated and 30 downregulated ones. Functional and pathway enrichment analysis was conducted on the differentially expressed circRNAs using Gene Ontology and KEGG databases. The results of this analysis indicated that several crucial biological processes and pathways were enriched in PE patients. circRNA–microRNA (miRNA) interaction analysis indicated that the reported differentially expresse circRNAs may be associated with some regulatory functions through miRNAs in PE patients. Two ceRNAs networks were constructed according to the targeting relationship between circRNAs/miRNAs and miRNAs/mRNAs. One sub-network contained one upregulated circRNA, four downregulated miRNAs and five upregulated mRNAs, and another sub-network contained 10 downregulated circRNAs, 21 upregulated miRNAs and 15 downregulated mRNAs. Conclusion CircRNA expression patterns have been investigated and this analysis revealed their potential regulatory mechanisms in PE patients. We constructed the ceRNAs (competing endogenous RNA) to reveal the potential molecular roles of dysregulated circRNAs in the PE patients using RNA sequencing data. circRNA_13301 was the only one upregulated circRNA in ceRNA being targeted by four miRNAs.
The objective of our research was to confirm the prediction role of Grobman model for vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) in Chinese pregnant women. In this research, 535 pregnant who had once cesarean delivery and the least once subsequent try to a vaginal labor in Jiaxing of China were involved. The Grobman background factors and five new factors were included. Overall, in total of 456 women had successful VBAC, the success percent was 85.2%. The new background variable “maternal height” was considered as an additional predictor for VBAC. The Grobman model's area under the curve (AUC) was 0.811 (95% CI = 0.751–0.870) and the AUC of this modified model combined 2 new factors was 0.834 (95% CI = 0.781–0.886). Nevertheless, there has no markedly difference between these 2 models of the AUC. In conclusion, the Grobman model was suitable for Chinese pregnant. However, further improvements were needed to make a new predictive model of VBAC success rate for Chinese pregnant women through analyzing the clinical data of vaginal trial delivery after cesarean section.
Pre-eclampsia (PE) is closely associated with perinatal morbidity and mortality and we want to investigate tetramethylpyrazine (TMP)'s effects on PE. Pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into five groups: normal pregnant (PC), PE, PE+TMP 20 mg/kg, PE+TMP 40 mg/kg, and PE+TMP 60 mg/kg group. The PE rat model was established via L-NAME treatment. Systolic blood pressures (SBP) and urinary protein concentration were detected via the tail-cuff method and CBB kit, respectively. mRNA levels of key genes were analyzed via quantitative PCR and protein levels of key genes were measured by ELISA or western blot. TMP decreased SBP and urinary protein concentration of PE rats. TMP inhibited L-NAME-induced decrease in pups alive ratio, pups weight, and the ratio of pups/placenta weight and reversed L-NAME induced changes in placental histology, whereas it had little effect on placental weight. Urinary nephrin and podocin expressions were enhanced and serum placental growth factor level was decreased in PE rats, whereas TMP inhibited the above phenomena. TMP suppressed L-NAME-induced sFlt-1 upregulation in serums and kidneys of PE rats, whereas it downregulated IL-6 and MCP-1 expression in PE rats' serums, placentas and kidneys. TMP also suppressed the increase in placental sFlt-1 and vascular endothelial growth factor level caused by L-NAME. In addition, TMP inhibited CHOP and GRP78 expressions and decreased the ratio of p-elF2α/elF2α in PE rats. TMP attenuated the consequences of NO inhibition in pregnant rats. K E Y W O R D SER stress, hypertension, pre-eclampsia, proteinuria, tetramethylpyrazine
Background Overmedicalization in labor management and delivery, including labor induction, is an increasing global concern. But detailed epidemiological data on labor induction in China remains unclear. Methods This was a cross-sectional study of data (2015–2016) from 96 hospitals in 24 (of 34) Chinese administrative divisions. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association between medical conditions and cesarean delivery among women undergoing induction. Linear regression analysis was performed to assess the association between the prelabor cesarean delivery and labor-induction rates in each hospital. The impacts of labor induction and prelabor cesarean delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared in low-risk women. Results Among 73 901 eligible participants, 48.1% were nulliparous. The overall weighted rate of labor induction in China was 14.2% (95% CI, 11.1–17.2%), with 18.4% (95% CI, 14.5–22.3%) in nulliparas and 10.2% (95% CI, 7.7–12.8%) in multiparas. Regardless of the induction method, the overall vaginal delivery rate was 72.9% (95% CI, 68.6–77.3%) in nulliparas and 86.6% (95% CI, 79.7–93.5%) in multiparas. Hospitals with a higher rate of nonmedically indicated cesarean delivery had a lower labor-induction rate in nulliparas (β = − 0.57%; 95% CI, − 0.92 to − 0.22%; P = 0.002). Compared with prelabor cesarean delivery, labor induction in low-risk women was not associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Conclusion The 2015–2016 labor-induction rate in China was 18.4% in nulliparas and 10.2% in multiparas. The proportion of prelabor cesarean delivery may contribute to regional differences in the labor-induction rate. Compared with prelabor cesarean delivery, labor induction in low-risk women may not increase severe maternal and neonatal morbidity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.