The purpose of this paper is to improve the different types of only public tender systems and contract systems in Myanmar. The study is divided into two parts. The first one is comparing the tender systems and the second is comparing the contract systems. Firstly, tender systems of each ministry are studied. When studying the existing practices of tender systems in Myanmar, there are many deficiencies in each ministry and they are unsystematic. To improve the tender system that is different and has defects, tender systems of each ministry are compared. A better and suitable tender system is defined from comparing each ministry. Then that better and suitable tender system is compared with American Institute of Architect (AIA). The suitable facts for Myanmar and the key factors or components that should involve are taken into account. And then the improved tender system that is more suitable and perfect gets. Secondly, contract systems of each ministry are studied. The bid phase has defects for making contract after awarding the tender. There are many problems in current existing contract bid because of weakness and difference of bid phase. To solve them, an improved contract system that should include the suitab for each contract investigate and constructs for Myanmar.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.