IMPORTANCE Although opioids are an important component of pain management for children recovering from surgery, postoperative opioid prescribing has contributed to the current opioid crisis in the United States because these medications are often prescribed in excess and are rarely properly disposed. One potential strategy to combat opioid misuse is to remove excess postoperative opioids from circulation by providing patients with drug disposal products that enable safe disposal of opioids in the home garbage. OBJECTIVE To determine whether the provision of a drug disposal bag increases proper opioid disposal among the families of pediatric patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This randomized clinical trial enrolled 202 parents or guardians of children 1 to 17 years of age who underwent otolaryngologic or urologic surgery at the outpatient surgery centers of a tertiary children's hospital in Columbus, Ohio, from June to December 2018 and who received an opioid prescription prior to discharge. INTERVENTIONS Families randomized to intervention were provided a drug disposal bag containing activated charcoal and instructions for use plus standard postoperative discharge instructions on opioid use, storage, and disposal. Families in standard care arm received standard postoperative discharge instructions only. All participants completed a baseline survey and a follow-up survey 2 to 4 weeks postoperatively. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary outcome was proper opioid disposal, defined as disposal using a drug disposal bag or a disposal method recommended by the US Food and Drug Administration. RESULTS Of 202 parents or guardians enrolled, 181 completed follow-up (92 in intervention arm and 89 in standard care arm). Most patients in both groups were white (75 [73.5%] vs 79 [80.6%]) and male (63 [61.2%] vs 54 [54.6%]), and the median (interquartile range) age was 6 (5-9) years in the intervention arm and 7 (6-10) years in the standard care arm. For intention-to-treat analyses, 92 families receiving a disposal bag and 89 families not receiving a disposal bag were included. Among them, 66 families (71.7%) randomized to receive a disposal bag reported properly disposing of their child's opioids, whereas 50 parents (56.2%) who did not receive a disposal bag reported proper opioid disposal (difference in proportions, 15.5%; 95% CI, 1.7%-29.3%; P = .03). Among only those families who filled an opioid prescription and had leftover opioids after resolution of their child's pain, 66 of 77 parents or guardians (85.7%) who had received a disposal bag and 50 of 77 parents or guardians (64.9%) who had received standard care reported properly disposing of their child's opioids (difference in proportions, 20.8%; 95% CI, 7.6%-34.0%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Results of this study indicated that providing drug disposal bags to families of children receiving postoperative opioids increased the likelihood of excess opioid disposal. Greater availability of disposal products may complement ongoing prescr...
Objective: To determine the impact of tumor characteristics and treatment approach on (1) local recurrence, (2) scoliosis development, and (3) patient-reported quality of life in children with sarcoma of the chest wall. Summary of Background Data: Children with chest wall sarcoma require multimodal therapy including chemotherapy, surgery, and/or radiation. Despite aggressive therapy which places them at risk for functional impairment and scoliosis, these patients are also at significant risk for local recurrence. Methods: A multi-institutional review of 175 children (median age 13 years) with chest wall sarcoma treated at seventeen Pediatric Surgical Oncology Research Collaborative institutions between 2008 and 2017 was performed. Patient-reported quality of life was assessed prospectively using PROMIS surveys. Results: The most common diagnoses were Ewing sarcoma (67%) and osteosarcoma (9%). Surgical resection was performed in 85% and radiation in 55%. A median of 2 ribs were resected (interquartile range = 1-3), and number of ribs resected did not correlate with margin status (P = 0.36). Local recurrence occurred in 23% and margin status was the only predictive factor (HR 2.24, P = 0.039). With a median follow-up of 5 years, 13% developed scoliosis (median Cobb angle 26) and 5% required corrective spine surgery. Scoliosis was associated with posteriorrib resection (HR 8.43; P= 0.003) and increased number of ribs
Summary:
One goal of an ideal phallic reconstruction is achieving tactile and erogenous sensation. Traditionally, the most common flap used in phalloplasty has been the radial forearm flap, where the medial and lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerves are coapted to meet this goal. The purpose of this article is to draw attention to the lesser-known posterior antebrachial cutaneous nerve (PABC) as an alternative or additional nerve for coaptation that innervates a majority of the shaft, where sensation is most desired. The presence, anatomical location, and territory of innervation of the antebrachial cutaneous nerves were assessed in a series of 12 consecutive in vivo radial forearm phalloplasties. A literature review was conducted to establish which nerves have traditionally been used for sensory reinnervation of the phallus. The PABC was the first nerve encountered on the radial border of the flap lying on the fascia in the interval between the brachioradialis and extensor carpi radials longus. The posterior and lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerves innervated the phallic shaft, whereas the anterior branch of the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve innervated the phallic urethra. There were no articles in our review that used PABC for nerve coaptation in radial forearm phalloplasty. The skin innervated by the PABC represents a significant portion of the phallic shaft when using the standard template for radial forearm phalloplasty. Despite this, its use is not described in the literature. The authors introduce the PABC as an alternative or additional nerve for coaptation in radial forearm phalloplasty.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.