The transcription factor Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) plays a central role in the transcriptional response to oxygen flux. To gain insight into the molecular pathways regulated by HIF-1, it is essential to identify the downstream-target genes. We report here a strategy to identify HIF-1-target genes based on an integrative genomic approach combining computational strategies and experimental validation. To identify HIF-1-target genes microarrays data sets were used to rank genes based on their differential response to hypoxia. The proximal promoters of these genes were then analyzed for the presence of conserved HIF-1-binding sites. Genes were scored and ranked based on their response to hypoxia and their HIF-binding site score. Using this strategy we recovered 41% of the previously confirmed HIF-1-target genes that responded to hypoxia in the microarrays and provide a catalogue of predicted HIF-1 targets. We present experimental validation for ANKRD37 as a novel HIF-1-target gene. Together these analyses demonstrate the potential to recover novel HIF-1-target genes and the discovery of mammalian-regulatory elements operative in the context of microarray data sets.
Hypoxia‐inducible factor (HIF)‐1 and HIF‐2 are heterodimeric transcription factors that mediate the cellular response to hypoxia. Their key regulatory subunits, HIF‐1α and HIF‐2α, are induced similarly by hypoxia, but their functional roles in cancer may be distinct and isoform‐specific. SW480 colon cancer cells with stable expression of siRNA to HIF‐1α or HIF‐2α or both were established. HIF‐1α‐deficient cells displayed lower rates of proliferation and migration, but HIF‐2α‐deficient cells exhibited enhanced anchorage independent growth in a soft agar assay. Xenograft studies revealed that HIF‐1α deficiency inhibited overall tumor growth, whereas deficiency of HIF‐2α stimulated tumor growth. In human colon cancer tissues, expression of HIF‐1α and to a lesser extent, HIF‐2α, was linked to upregulation of VEGF and tumor angiogenesis. However, loss of expression of HIF‐2α but not HIF‐1α was strongly correlated with advanced tumor stage. DNA microarray analysis identified distinct sets of HIF‐1α and HIF‐2α target genes that may explain these phenotypic differences. Collectively, these findings suggest that HIF isoforms may have differing cellular functions in colon cancer. In particular, HIF‐1α promoted the growth of SW480 colon cancer cells but HIF‐2α appeared to restrain growth. Consequently, therapeutic approaches that target HIF may need to consider these isoform‐specific properties. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27
Background & Aims Colorectal cancers (CRCs) displaying DNA microsatellite instability (MSI) are associated with a favorable natural history, but the molecular basis for this observation has not been defined. We sought to determine whether the epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) is impaired in MSI-positive CRCs that characteristically have a mutant transforming growth factor-β receptor type II (TGFBR2) gene. Methods The induction of EMT by TGF-β1 was analyzed by phase contrast microscopy, immunofluorescence, qRT-PCR, immunoblotting, and cellular migration and invasion assays. Expression of EMT markers was evaluated by immunohistochemistry and qRT-PCR in a series of human colorectal tumors. Results TGF-β1 induced changes in cellular morphology, gene expression, motility, and invasion consistent with EMT in microsatellite stable (MSS) colon cancer cells whereas cells with MSI and mutant TGFBR2 were unresponsive to TGF-β1. These effects did not require Smad4 but depended upon the recruitment of ERK. Tumor cells with MSI but wildtype TGFBR2 underwent EMT in response to TGF-β1, indicating that TGFBR2 genotype is a key determinant of the EMT response in tumors with MSI. In human colorectal tumors, expression of EMT markers was significantly associated with adverse clinicopathologic features and the absence of MSI. Conclusions These findings define a unique genotype-phenotype relationship between TGFBR2 and EMT that may contribute to the improved prognosis consistently observed in colon cancers with MSI.
Current classifications of human gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are inconsistent and based upon histopathologic but not molecular features. We sought to compare a molecular classification with the World Health Organization (WHO) histologic classification, identify genes that may be important for tumor progression, and determine whether gastrointestinal NETs (GI-NETs) differ in their molecular profile from pancreatic NETs (PNETs). DNA microarray analysis was performed to identify differentially expressed genes in PNETs and GI-NETs. Confirmation of expression levels was obtained by quantitative real-time PCR. Immunoblotting and mutational analysis were performed for selected genes. Hierarchical clustering of 19 PNETs revealed a 'benign' and 'malignant' cluster that corresponded well with the WHO categories of welldifferentiated endocrine tumor (WDET) and well-differentiated endocrine carcinoma (WDEC) respectively. FEV, adenylate cyclase 2 (ADCY2), nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A, member 2 (NR4A2), and growth arrest and DNA-damage-inducible, beta (GADD45b) were the most highly up-regulated genes in the malignant group of PNETs. Platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) was expressed in both WDETs and WDECs, and phosphorylation of PDGFR-b was observed in 83% of all PNETs. Malignant ileal GI-NETs exhibited a distinctive gene expression profile, and extracellular matrix protein 1 (ECM), vesicular monoamine member 1 (VMAT1), galectin 4 (LGALS4), and RET Proto-oncogene (RET) were highly up-regulated genes. Gene expression profiles reflect the current WHO classification and can distinguish benign from malignant PNETs and also PNETs from GI-NETs. This suggests that molecular profiling may enhance tumor classification schemes. Potential gene targets have also been identified, and PDGFR and RET are candidates that may represent novel therapeutic targets.
KRAS and BRAF mutations are frequently observed in human colon cancers. These mutations occur in a mutually exclusive manner, and each is associated with distinctive biological features. We showed previously that K-ras can interact with hypoxia to activate multiple signaling pathways. Many hypoxic responses are mediated by hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1α and HIF-2α, and we sought to define the roles of mutant KRAS and BRAF in the induction of HIF-1α and HIF-2α in colon cancer cells. Ectopic expression of mutant K-ras in Caco2 cells enhanced the hypoxic induction of only HIF-1α, whereas mutant BRAF enhanced both HIF-1α and HIF-2α. Knockout or knockdown of mutant KRAS in DLD-1 and HCT116 cells impaired the hypoxic induction of only HIF-1α. HIF-1α mRNA levels were comparable in cells with and without a KRAS mutation. However, the rate of HIF-1α protein synthesis was higher in cells with a KRAS mutation, and this was suppressed by the phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitor LY294002. In contrast, knockdown of mutant BRAF in HT29 cells suppressed both HIF-1α and HIF-2α. Although BRAF regulated mRNA levels of both HIF-1α and HIF-2α, knockdown of BRAF or treatment with the MEK inhibitor PD98059 impaired the translation of only HIF-2α. Our data reveal that oncogenic KRAS and BRAF mutations differentially regulate the hypoxic induction of HIF-1α and HIF-2α in colon cancer, and this may potentially contribute to the phenotypic differences of KRAS and BRAF mutations in colon tumors. [Cancer Res 2009;69(21):8499-506]
The aim of this study was to investigate the inhibitory effect of TSU68 [(Z)-5-[(1,2-dihydro-2-oxo-3H-indol-3-ylidene)methyl]-2,4-dimethyl-1H-pyrrole-3-propanoic acid; SU6668], an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, plateletderived growth factor receptor B, and fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1), on colon cancer liver metastasis, and to test the hypothesis that TSU68 modulates the microenvironment in the liver before the formation of metastasis. First, we implanted the highly metastatic human colon cancer TK-4 orthotopically into the cecal walls of nude mice, followed by twice-daily administration of TSU68 (400 mg/kg/d) or vehicle. Five weeks of treatment with TSU68 significantly inhibited liver metastasis compared with the control group (P < 0.001). Next, we analyzed the gene expression profile in premetastatic liver using microarrays. Microarray and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR analysis showed that mRNA levels for the chemokine CXCL1 were significantly increased in tumorbearing mice compared with non-tumor-bearing mice. Moreover, CXCL1 expression was significantly decreased by TSU68 treatment. CXCR2 expression was detected predominantly on tumor cells in orthotopic tumors compared with ectopic tumors. The number of migrating neutrophils in premetastatic liver was significantly decreased in the TSU68-treated group (P < 0.001). The amount of interleukin-12 (IL-12) p40 in the portal vein was significantly decreased by TSU68 (P = 0.02). Blockade of both CXCR2 and IL-12 p40 with a neutralizing antibody significantly inhibited liver metastasis. These results suggest that the CXCL1/CXCR2 axis is important in cancer metastasis and that TSU68 may modulate the premetastatic niche in the target organ through suppression of the inflammatory response, which might be an alternative mechanism used by antiangiogenic agents. [Cancer Res 2008;68(23):9754-62]
Overexpressed LPCAT1 protein in gastric mucosa appears to play important roles in the tumorigenic process of gastric cancer by converting LPC to PC.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.