Introduction
This study aimed to evaluate whether it is useful for junior physicians to use a three‐dimensional (3D) kidney model when evaluating the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score.
Materials and Methods
An expert and four urology residents retrospectively evaluated the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores of 64 renal tumors (62 patients) that underwent robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy at our hospital. The expert evaluated 64 R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores with computed tomography (CT), whereas four residents evaluated 32 cases using CT alone and the other 32 cases using CT and a 3D kidney model. The consistency between the expert and residents was assessed by Cohen's kappa score. Patient‐specific 3D kidney models were created in a gird style using a 3D printer based on CT or magnetic resonance imaging of the patient.
Results
For all four residents, the accuracy of the overall R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score was significantly higher with the 3D model and CT than with CT alone (P < .001). Regarding the individual components of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score, the accuracy rates of “E,” “N,” “A,” and “L” scores were higher with the 3D model and CT than with the CT alone (P = .020–.089).
Conclusion
Patient‐specific 3D‐printed kidney models could improve the resident's understanding of the renal tumor complexity and could be an important educational tool for residents.
A 68-year-old man was admitted to our hospital to undergo an examination for nephrotic syndrome while concurrently complicated with recurrent thymoma in the parietal pleura and retroperitoneum. He had been diagnosed with invasive thymoma and had undergone thymo-thymectomy seven years previously. Based on the renal biopsy findings, his nephrotic syndrome was ascribed to minimal change disease. He was treated with corticosteroid monotherapy, which resulted in complete remission six months later, despite the fact that the recurrent thymoma remained. The role of thymoma in the pathogenesis of paraneoplastic glomerulopathy and the therapeutic concerns that emerged in this case are also discussed.
Background
The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scoring system is used to evaluate the complexity of renal tumors; however, inconsistency among evaluators, especially junior physicians, is an issue. The objective of the study was to evaluate whether it is useful for junior physicians to use a three-dimensional (3D) kidney model when evaluating the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score.
Methods
An expert and four urology residents retrospectively evaluated the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores of 64 renal tumors (62 patients) which underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy at our hospital. The expert evaluated 64 R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores with computed tomography (CT) scan imaging, while four residents evaluated 32 cases using only CT and the other 32 cases using CT and 3D kidney model. Consistency between the expert and residents was assessed by Cohen’s kappa score. Patient-specific 3D kidney models were created in a gird style using a 3D printer based on the CT or magnetic resonance imaging of the patient.
Results
For all four residents, the accuracy of the overall R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score was significantly higher by 3D model and CT than CT only (p < 0.001). Regarding individual components of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score, the accuracy of “E,” “N,” “A,” and “L” scores was higher by 3D model and CT than by CT only (p = 0.020–0.089).
Conclusion
Patient-specific 3-D printed kidney model would improve the resident’s understanding of renal tumor complexity and could be an important educational tool for residents.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.