BackgroundProblem-based Learning (PBL) has been suggested as a key educational method of knowledge acquisition to improve medical education. We sought to evaluate the differences in medical school education between graduates from PBL-based and conventional curricula and to what extent these curricula fit job requirements.MethodsGraduates from all German medical schools who graduated between 1996 and 2002 were eligible for this study. Graduates self-assessed nine competencies as required at their day-to-day work and as taught in medical school on a 6-point Likert scale. Results were compared between graduates from a PBL-based curriculum (University Witten/Herdecke) and conventional curricula.ResultsThree schools were excluded because of low response rates. Baseline demographics between graduates of the PBL-based curriculum (n = 101, 49% female) and the conventional curricula (n = 4720, 49% female) were similar. No major differences were observed regarding job requirements with priorities for "Independent learning/working" and "Practical medical skills". All competencies were rated to be better taught in PBL-based curriculum compared to the conventional curricula (all p < 0.001), except for "Medical knowledge" and "Research competence". Comparing competencies required at work and taught in medical school, PBL was associated with benefits in "Interdisciplinary thinking" (Δ + 0.88), "Independent learning/working" (Δ + 0.57), "Psycho-social competence" (Δ + 0.56), "Teamwork" (Δ + 0.39) and "Problem-solving skills" (Δ + 0.36), whereas "Research competence" (Δ - 1.23) and "Business competence" (Δ - 1.44) in the PBL-based curriculum needed improvement.ConclusionAmong medical graduates in Germany, PBL demonstrated benefits with regard to competencies which were highly required in the job of physicians. Research and business competence deserve closer attention in future curricular development.
Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) after cardiac arrest reduces mortality and improves neurological outcome. Experimental TH after traumatic brain injury (TBI) indicated similar effects, but benefits were not reproducible in large clinical trials. Therefore, a novel approach of pharyngeal selective brain cooling (pSBC) was tested in respect to neurological outcome in a model of experimental TBI. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to lateral fluid percussion (LFP) brain injury and received pSBC for 3h post-injury. All animals were examined for neuromotor and sensorimotor dysfunction and coordination: before and after injury, and during recovery on day post-injury (DPI) 7 and 14 using (i) the standardized Composite Neuroscore (NS) test and (ii) the Rotarod test. Recovery of cognitive function was assessed on days 10-14 using (iii) the Barnes Circular Maze (BCM). In pSBC-animals, brain temperature was selectively lowered to 33 +/- 0.5 degrees C at 15 min post-injury, keeping rectal temperature at a physiologic level. All animals subjected to TBI via LFP showed an identical pattern of severe neurofunctional impairment at 24 h after injury. In the time course of the experiment, pSBC-animals showed superior neurofunctional recovery on DPI 7 (p = 0.03) and 14 (p = 0.002). Similarly, distance, time, and maximum speed on the Rota-Rod were significantly increased in pSBC-animals on DPI 7 (p < 0.01) and 14 (p < 0.01), as well as latency, distance, and mean number of errors in the BCM on DPI 14 (p < 0.01). The novel approach of pSBC was associated with improved neuromotor, sensormotor, and neurocognitive outcome after experimental TBI.
Oxygen plays a pivotal role as a nutrient to the brain. Monitoring partial pressure of oxygen (ptO2) has been shown to correlate with outcome after brain injury if certain tissue-ptO2-goals can be achieved. Oxford Optronix has recently developed a new fiber-optic based sensor (MPBS) with a large tissue sampling volume and long-term stability up to 10 days. Direct comparison of the MPBS sensor with the Licox system was performed using an in-vitro and in-vivo model. No statistically significant differences between the MPBS and the Licox sensor in different settings were found. The response times to a sudden drop in ptO2 was faster for the MPBS than for the Licox probes (time of 80% signal change; 65 +/- 11 vs 110 +/- 14 s; p<0.05).
Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) is still being explored as a therapeutic option after traumatic brain injury (TBI) but clinical data has not supported its efficacy. Experimental approaches were promising, but clinical data did not support its efficacy in the treatment of TBI. A novel approach of pharyngeal selective brain cooling (pSBC), recently introduced by our group, has been accompanied by superior neurofunctional, sensorimotor, and cognitive outcomes. This work is now extended by data on histomorphological and physical outcomes after pSBC in a model of experimental TBI. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to lateral fluid-percussion (LFP) brain injury, and randomized to the following experimental groups: (1) TBI with pSBC, (2) TBI without pSBC, and (3) sham animals. On day post-injury (DPI) 14, the animals were sacrificed and their brains were harvested for immunohistochemistry using the following antibodies: (1) glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), (2) neurofilament (NF), and (3) synaptophysin (SY). In pSBC animals brain temperature was selectively lowered to 33 ± 0.5°C within 15 min post-injury, and maintained for 180 min after induction, while keeping rectal temperatures at physiological levels. Animals that had undergone pSBC showed a significantly faster recovery of body weight starting on DPI 3, and had gained substantially more weight than TBI-only animals on DPI 14 (p < 0.001), indicating superior physical recovery. Areas of cortical damage were significantly smaller in pSBC animals compared to TBI-only animals (p < 0.01). pSBC was associated with preservation of cortical tissue ipsilateral to the lesion, and superior physical recovery after experimental TBI. These results complement earlier reports in which pSBC was associated with superior neurofunctional and cognitive outcomes using the same experimental model.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.