T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) is caused by the cooperation of multiple oncogenic lesions1,2. We used exome sequencing on 67 T-ALLs to gain insight into the mutational spectrum in these leukemias. We detected protein-altering mutations in 508 genes, with an average of 8.2 mutations in pediatric and 21.0 mutations in adult T-ALL. Using stringent filtering, we predict seven new oncogenic driver genes in T-ALL. We identify CNOT3 as a tumor suppressor mutated in 7 of 89 (7.9%) adult T-ALLs, and its knockdown causes tumors in a sensitized Drosophila melanogaster model3. In addition, we identify mutations affecting the ribosomal proteins RPL5 and RPL10 in 12 of 122 (9.8%) pediatric T-ALLs, with recurrent alterations of Arg98 in RPL10. Yeast and lymphoid cells expressing the RPL10 Arg98Ser mutant showed a ribosome biogenesis defect. Our data provide insights into the mutational landscape of pediatric versus adult T-ALL and identify the ribosome as a potential oncogenic factor.

No abstract

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) form a distinctive group of mesenchymal neoplasms, showing differentiation towards the interstitial cells of Cajal. Morphologically, GISTs vary from cellular spindle cell tumors to epithelioid or mixed, epithelioid and spindle cell variants. The genotypic features underlying the morphologic differences of GISTs with vs without epithelioid components are not well defined. Acquisition of activating mutations in KIT and PDGFRA has been reported as alternative oncogenic events in the pathogenesis of GISTs. In this study, a comprehensive KIT and PDGFRA mutational analysis was performed in a group of 28 epithelioid/mixed type tumors, in order to explore whether a specific KIT/PDGFRA mutational status segregates these neoplasms from spindle cell variant GISTs. All GISTs were primary neoplasms, 16 (57.1%) originated from the stomach and 12 (42.8%) from other locations. Histomorphologically, 14 GISTs showed an epithelioid and 14 a mixed cell type pattern. Mutational analysis included KIT exons 9, 11, 13, and 17, and PDGFRA exons 12 and 18 prescreening by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography, followed by direct sequencing. Activating mutations of KIT were found in 14 (50%) GISTs, the majority being within exon 11 (n ¼ 11; 39.2%), and the other comprised exon 9 AY 502-503 duplications (n ¼ 2; 7.2%) and exon 17 Lys-Aln 822 missense mutations (n ¼ 1; 3.6%). Most of the KIT mutant tumors (n ¼ 11; 78.6%) originated from nongastric sites. Seven (25.0%) GISTs with no detectable KIT mutations demonstrated PDGFRA mutant isoforms, carrying either D842 V mutations (n ¼ 5) or exon 18 deletions (n ¼ 2). All GISTs harboring PDGFRA mutant isoforms originated from the stomach. In seven tumors, no detectable mutations were found; all but one of nonmutant tumors initiated from the stomach and exhibited an epithelioid morphology. These findings indicate that the mutational status of epithelioid/mixed GISTs associates with the anatomical site of the tumor.

Reciprocal translocations involving the MLL gene on chromosome band 11q23 have been observed in both acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). In AML, identification of MLL breakpoints is an important prognostic factor. Breakpoints are clustered in an 8 kb DNA fragment (bcr) and can be detected by Southern blotting or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. Our objective in this study was to design a DNA probe set that enables optimal detection of MLL rearrangements using interphase FISH. Two PAC clones, 217A21 and 167K13, spanning the MLL gene with a minimal overlap in the bcr were isolated and labeled. Twenty-seven AML/ALL patients with cytogenetic 11q23 abnormalities, seven AML/ALL patients without 11q23 abnormalities but MLL rearrangement by Southern blotting, and eight healthy donors were analyzed by FISH. We compared this double-color FISH analysis with FISH using a YAC clone (yB22B2) and with Southern blotting. The PAC probe combination detects an MLL breakpoint in all cases with MLL rearrangement detected by Southern blotting except for cases with a partial tandem duplication detected by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). FISH using the PAC probes also detected MLL breakpoints in four cases with MLL deletions telomeric to the breakpoint that could not be detected by the single probe yB22B2. This new probe set provides a reliable and rapid assay for the diagnosis of AML and ALL patients with MLL/11q23 breakpoints.

The t(4;11) translocation is the cytogenetic hallmark of a subset of acute lymphoblastic leukemias characterized by pro-B immunophenotype and a dismal prognosis. This translocation fuses the MLL gene on chromosome band 11q23 and the AF4 gene on 4q21, resulting in the expression of fusion transcripts from both translocated chromosomes. The MLL-AF4 chimeric transcript is thought to mediate the leukemic transformation. The MLL genomic disruption detected by Southern blot and the RT-PCR for the MLL-AF4 chimeric transcript expression are molecular evidence of this chromosomal translocation. However, similar molecular rearrangements have also been identified in cases without the cytogenetic t(4;11). We report a 30-year-old patient with high risk ALL, a normal karyotype, and molecular evidence of MLL-AF4 fusion. Using a double color FISH assay with MLL specific PAC probes, a cryptic t(4;11) due to insertion of 5′ MLL sequences in chromosome 4q21 was demonstrated. Consequently the MLL-AF4 was encoded by der(4). This insertion mechanism precludes the genomic recombination of AF4-MLL and supports the crucial role played by MLL-AF4 in leukemogenesis. The findings of our case, along with others, show the importance of complementing the karyotype with molecular and FISH techniques. Leukemia (2001) 15, 595-600.

No abstract

No abstract

The inv(16)(p13q22) masked by different translocations was detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and confirmed by molecular analysis in three adult patients presenting with acute myeloid leukemia (AML)‐M2 (cases 1 and 3) and M4Eo (case 2). Cytogenetic analysis revealed 47,XX,t(9;16)(p23;p13),+22 (case 1); 46,XX,t(1;16)(p32;p13) (case 2); and 46,XY,?del(16)(q22) (case 3). Using a panel of probes for chromosomes 1, 9, 16, and 20 as well as probes to detect inv(16), i.e., two cosmid contigs hybridizing proximally and distally to the 16p13 breakpoint, FISH demonstrated inv(16) involving the derivative 16 as well as reciprocal translocations between 16q22‐qter and 9p24 (case 1), 1p32 (case 2), and 20q13 (case 3). In addition, a small interstitial del(16)(p13p13) proximal to the MYH11 breakpoint was detected in case 1. Reverse transcriptase‐polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) and Southern blot analysis showed a CBFB‐MYH11 fusion transcript and MYH11 rearrangement, respectively, in all three cases. We conclude that: l) inv(16) can be masked by other structural abnormalities involving chromosome 16; 2) some of the so‐called variant translocations not explored at the molecular level may in fact represent a masked inv(16); and 3) FISH, RT‐PCR, and Southern blot analyses are reliable tools to detect masked inv(16) and should be applied in all AML cases with structural changes of chromosome 16. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 22:87–94, 1998. © 1998 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.