2001
DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2402050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cryptic t(4;11) encoding MLL-AF4 due to insertion of 5′ MLL sequences in chromosome 4

Abstract: The t(4;11) translocation is the cytogenetic hallmark of a subset of acute lymphoblastic leukemias characterized by pro-B immunophenotype and a dismal prognosis. This translocation fuses the MLL gene on chromosome band 11q23 and the AF4 gene on 4q21, resulting in the expression of fusion transcripts from both translocated chromosomes. The MLL-AF4 chimeric transcript is thought to mediate the leukemic transformation. The MLL genomic disruption detected by Southern blot and the RT-PCR for the MLL-AF4 chimeric tr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(26 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The insertion produced a fusion of the MLL and AF4 genes that are transcribed in the same orientation in relation to the centromere. Recently, Von Bergh et al 24 reported a similar insertion of the 5 0 MLL fragment into the AF4 locus in an adult patient with ALL. Using various PAC clones, they evaluated the size of the inserted fragment as approximately 250 kb that is unidentifiable by cytogenetic analysis, and the insertion is reasonably called cryptic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The insertion produced a fusion of the MLL and AF4 genes that are transcribed in the same orientation in relation to the centromere. Recently, Von Bergh et al 24 reported a similar insertion of the 5 0 MLL fragment into the AF4 locus in an adult patient with ALL. Using various PAC clones, they evaluated the size of the inserted fragment as approximately 250 kb that is unidentifiable by cytogenetic analysis, and the insertion is reasonably called cryptic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…[20][21][22][23][24] Cryptic insertions were classified into two types: one has the opposite transcriptional orientations of the two genes forming a fusion in relation to the centromere, and the other has the same orientation of the two genes in relation to the centromere. [20][21][22][23][24] The inv ins(10;11)(p12;q23q23) found in the present patient (no. 1477) belongs to the former type, and the inverted insertion produced a fusion of the MLL and AF10 genes that are transcribed oppositely in relation to the centromere in the normal chromosome 10 and 11 locus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cryptic insertion involving MLL would evade detection by whole chromosome paints and subtelomeric probes but would also need to be accompanied by a 3Ј deletion in order to produce this signal pattern. However, previously reported cryptic insertions resulted in the insertion of 5Ј MLL into the partner chromosome rather than the other way, and they occurred without loss of the 3Ј MLL signal from the der(11) (Borkhardt et al, 2001;von Bergh et al, 2001;Dyson et al, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In three cases, involvement of the MLL gene was excluded, indicating a falsepositive rate of 3 of 11, or 27%, for the presence of an MLL rearrangement by this FISH assay. Although the majority of MLL rearrangements occur as a result of an established chromosomal translocation involving 11q23, it is evident that cryptic insertions and complex abnormalities can mask its involvement (von Bergh et al, 2001;Dyson et al, 2003;Watanabe et al, 2003). In conjunction with the knowledge that not all 11q23 abnormalities involve the MLL gene , the MLL status of rare 11q23 translocations needs to be confirmed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AF4 is located at a fragile break-point region on chromosome 4 and is associated with a wide variety of chromosomal translocations. AF4 is a member of AF4/LAF4/AF5q31/FMR2 family of nuclear transcription factors (Gu et al, 1996;von Bergh et al, 2001;von Bergh et al, 2002) and also shows significant homology to the Drosophila melanogaster pair-rule gene Lilliputian (Su et al, 2001). Surprisingly, three of these family members (AF4/LAF4/AF5q31) are associated with infant leukemias involving reciprocal translocations with the MLL1 gene Ma and Staudt, 1996;Taki et al, 1999).…”
Section: Domain Architecture and The Functional Roles Of Af4 Familymentioning
confidence: 99%