No abstract

that different conceptual models of the relationship between carers and social care service providers shape the extent to which carers can be offered choice and control on similar terms to service users.Understanding these models helps to explain the relative invisibility of choice and control for carers in recent policy proposals. In particular, the exercise of choice by carers is likely to be highly problematic if it involves relinquishing some unpaid care-giving activities.

The literature review provides some evidence that respite for carers of frail elderly people may have a small positive effect upon carers in terms of burden and mental or physical health. Carers were generally very satisfied with respite. No reliable evidence was found that respite either benefits or adversely affects care recipients, or that it delays entry to residential care. Economic evidence suggests that day care is at least as costly as usual care. Pilot studies are needed to inform full-scale studies of respite in the UK.

This paper examines the explanatory value of Fleck's conceptual analysis with regard to the development of medical knowledge. The discussion is illustrated by empirical data gathered as part of an on-going study into Repetitive Strain Injury (RSI), a condition currently disputed within medical circles. Whilst there is empirical substantiation for some of Fleck's beliefs, the findings suggest his notion that general practitioners are educated and patients uneducated is too simplistic; in particular circumstances these attributes may be reversed. Furthermore, there is little evidence to show that ideas are circulated and exchanged between specialists, GPs and a lay audience; according to this revised view, medical knowledge is determined by experts alone. By invoking an extended version of Collins' notion of the 'core-set', the paper considers how seemingly marginal actors can exploit their technical competence and thus play an influential role in medical debate.

The UK Government is concerned that women and men who care for disabled or sick relatives, or elderly people, and who also wish to take part in paid work should have increased opportunities to do so. However, many informal carers find combining work and care difficult; some may 'choose' to give up paid employment completely. The present paper draws on the findings from two projects to explore the extent to which the needs of employees with caring responsibilities are supported in the workplace. The two projects examined evidence from a study of informal carers assessed under the 1995 Carers Act, identified the difficulties which they face in their workplace and observed the strategies which they developed to help sustain the two roles. From this, a model of support for working carers was developed which includes leave policies, carer-friendly working arrangements, access to a (private) telephone, and supportive line managers and co-workers. This support model was tested on the employment policies of 13 employers to see how 'carer-friendly' they were. Most of the organisations studied were able to provide appropriate support for carers identified in the model. Questions were then raised about different aspects of carer-friendly working arrangements, including whether carers should receive any special treatment that is not available to their colleagues, the role of line managers, and the relationship between seniority and opportunities to combine work and care.