Background One metabolic equivalent (MET) is equal to resting oxygen consumption. The average value for one MET in humans is widely quoted as 3.5 mL/kg/min. However, this value was derived from a single male participant at the end of the 19th century and has become canonical. Several small studies have identified varied estimates of one MET from widely varying populations. The ability of a patient to complete 4 MET (or 14 mL/kg/min) is considered an indicator of their fitness to proceed to surgery. Aims To define a typical value of one MET from a real‐world patient population, as well as determine factors that influenced the value. Methods A database of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) was interrogated to find a total of 1847 adult patients who had undergone CPET testing in the previous 10 years. From this database, estimates of oxygen consumption (VO2) at rest and at the anaerobic threshold and several other variables were obtained. The influence of age, body mass index (BMI), sex and the use of beta‐blockers was tested. Results The median resting VO2 at rest was 3.6 mL/kg/min (interquartile range (IQR): 3.0–4.2). Neither sex, age >65 years or the use of beta‐blockers produced a significant difference in resting VO2, while those with a BMI >25 kg/m2 had a significantly lower VO2 at rest (3.4 mL/kg/min vs 4.0 mL/kg/min; P < 0.001). Conclusions The estimate of 3.6 mL/kg/min for resting VO2 presented here is consistent with the previous literature, despite this being the first large study of its kind. This estimate can be safely used for pre‐operative risk stratification.
Background: Ageing is a continuous accumulative ordinary physiological phenomena occurs upon all organs and body structures including saliva by its constituents which can influence the caries process, for that this study was conducted to determine the impact of ageing on selected chemical composition of saliva and their effects on dental caries experience characteristics at different age groups among apparently healthy men. Materials and method: A descriptive comparative study was conducted to compare between three study samples (young, middle and old age adults), thirty male in each study insert, aged (20 years, 40 years and 60 years) respectively. They were selected from private health center in Baghdad - Iraq, from the mid of November 2017until the end of February 2018, where they subjected to complete body investigations to confirm their health status, followed by thorough general body history and oral examination. Caries experience was recorded according to the criteria of WHO in1987. Un-stimulated saliva was collected according to Navazesh and Kumer and analyzed chemically to determine the level of calcium ions and alkaline phosphatase. All data then statistically analyzed by using SPSS version 22. Results: The current study, showed that the caries experience represented by DMFs increased with increasing age, by which the highest mean value of DMFs was established in the oldest age (60.37± 31.39) and the lowest mean value was noted among the youngest age (7.27±8.02). A significant differences existed between all study samples (p≤0.05). However, the missing surfaces represented the largest proportion of DMFs value when compared to Ds and Fs among all ages Iin the current study, with significant differences (p≤0.05) was followed by the decay fraction that found to be increased with age but with no significant difference. Salivary Calcium ions showed decreasing with increasing age with statically significant differences among different study samples while salivary alkaline phosphatase was increased with increasing age with no significant differences. Concerning the caries experience among the study samples, the salivary Ca+2 ions inversely correlated while alkaline phosphates correlated positively with caries experience. Conclusion: there is a significant age related changes on the selected chemical constituents of saliva that could affect the caries experience
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.