Traditional conscious sedation for endobronchial ultrasound procedures places patients at risk of desaturation, and high-flow nasal oxygen may reduce the risk. We designed a parallel-group randomised controlled trial of high-flow nasal oxygen at a flow rate of 30-70 l.min via nasal cannulae, compared with standard oxygen therapy at 10 l.min via a bite block in adults planned for conscious sedation for endobronchial ultrasound. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients experiencing desaturation (defined as SpO < 90%). Secondary outcomes included oxygen saturation after pre-oxygenation, lowest oxygen saturation during procedure, number of hypoxic episodes, duration of hypoxia, end-procedure end-tidal CO , satisfaction scores and complications. Thirty participants were allocated to each group. Baseline patient characteristics, procedure time and anaesthetic agents used were similar between the groups. Desaturation occurred in 4 out of 30 patients allocated to the high-flow nasal oxygen group, compared with 10 out of 30 allocated to the standard oxygenation group, a non-significant difference (p = 0.07) with intention to treat analysis. The difference was significant (p = 0.047) when using a per-protocol analysis. Oxygen saturation after pre-oxygenation and the lowest oxygen saturation during procedure were significantly higher in the high-flow nasal oxygen group compared with the standard oxygenation group; median (IQR [range] 100 (99-100 [93-100]) vs. 98 (97-99 [94-100]), p = 0.0001 and 97.5 (94-99 [77-100]) vs. 92 (88-95 [79-98]), p < 0.001, respectively. There were no differences in other secondary outcomes. Although high-flow nasal oxygen may prevent desaturation due to some causes, it does not protect against hypoxaemia in all circumstances.

This study explored the use of high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) in both pre-oxygenation and apnoeic oxygenation in adults who were intubated following a non-rapid sequence induction. Fifty patients were randomised to receive pre-oxygenation via a standard facemask or the Transnasal Humidified Rapid-Insufflation Ventilatory Exchange (THRIVE) device. After five minutes of pre-oxygenation, induction and muscle relaxant agents were given. While waiting for complete paralysis, patients in the standard facemask group received bag-mask ventilation (BMV), whereas patients in the HFNO group received apnoeic oxygenation via the THRIVE device. Serial blood samples for arterial blood gas analysis were taken. Baseline patient and airway characteristics were similar. The median PaO 2 after pre-oxygenation was 357 (interquartile range [IQR] 324-450 [range 183-550]) mmHg in the facemask group, compared to 471 (IQR 429-516 [range 185-550]) mmHg in the HFNO group (P=0.01). The median arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO 2) in the HFNO group decreased after a period of apnoeic oxygenation, and was significantly lower when compared to patients who received BMV in facemask group. The arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure (PaCO 2) level after complete paralysis was significantly higher in the HFNO group when compared to the facemask group (median 52 [IQR 48-55 {range 40-65}] versus median 43 [IQR 40-48 {range 35-63}] mmHg, P=0.0005 and P=0.004 respectively). There were no differences in the time to muscle paralysis and time to intubation. Seven patients required use of airway adjuncts during BMV in the facemask group, compared to none in the HFNO group (P=0.004). No complications were observed in either group. HFNO produces a higher PaO 2 after pre-oxygenation and safe PaO 2 during intubation. However, the subsequent fall in PaO 2 and rise in PaCO 2 indicates that it is not as effective as BMV in maintaining oxygenation and ventilation following neuromuscular blockade.

Background Teamwork in the operating theatre is a complex emergent phenomenon and is driven by cooperative relationships between staff. A foundational requirement for teamwork is the ability to communicate effectively, and in particular, knowing each other’s name. Many operating theatre staff do not know each other’s name, even after formal team introductions. The use of theatre caps to display a staff member’s name and role has been suggested to improve communication and teamwork. Methods We hypothesized that the implementation of scrub hats with individual team members' names and roles would improve the perceived quality and effectiveness of communication in the operating theatre. A pilot project was designed as a pre-/post-implementation questionnaire sent to 236 operating room staff members at a general hospital in suburban Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, between November 6 to December 18, 2018. Participants included medical practitioners (anaesthetists, surgeons, obstetricians and gynaecologists), nurses (anaesthetic, scrub/scout and paediatric nurses), midwives and theatre technicians. The primary outcome was a change in perceived teamwork score, measured using a five position Likert scale. Results Of 236 enrolled participants, 107 (45%) completed both the pre and post intervention surveys. The median perceived teamwork response of four did not change after the intervention, though the number of low scores was reduced (p = 0.015). In a pre-planned subgroup analysis, the median perceived teamwork score rose for midwives from three to four (p < 0.001), while for other craft groups remained similar. The median number of staff members in theatre that a participant did not know the name of reduced from three to two (p < 0.001). Participants reported knowing the names of all staff members present in the theatre more frequently after the intervention (31% vs 15%, p < 0.001). The reported rate of formal team introductions was not significantly different after the intervention (34.7% vs 47.7% p = 0.058). Conclusions In this study, we found that wearing caps displaying name and role appeared to improve perceived teamwork and improve communication between staff members working in the operating theatre.

No abstract

Background: The management of post-operative pain and high levels of acute and chronic opioid use following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) remain challenges to the perioperative team. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the opioid sparing effects, analgesic effects, and safety profile of perioperative gabapentinoid usage in lower limb arthroplasty.Methods: We searched multiple databases from inception until May 2019 and included randomized controlled trials (RCT) on perioperative gabapentinoids in lower limb arthroplasty. The primary outcome was cumulative opioid consumption (oral morphine equivalents) at 24 and 48 hours, and the secondary outcomes were pain scores, time to hospital discharge, and adverse events including nausea, vomiting, pruritus, and sedation. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane tool. The grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation methodology for the certainty of evidence was also used.Results: We included 19 RCT involving 2,455 patients undergoing lower limb arthroplasty. The overall methodological quality of included studies was good. Gabapentinoid use was associated with a significant reduction in opioid consumption at 24 hour (mean difference (MD) 22.81 mg [95 percent Confidence Interval (CI) 13.64-31.98]) and 48 hour (MD 44.03 mg [95 percent CI 16.92-71.14]). We found no meaningful difference in pain scores at rest between gabapentinoid and placebo groups at 24 or 48 hours. Gabapentinoid use reduced the risk of postoperative nausea (risk ratio (RR) 0.69 [95 percent CI 0.57-0.82]), vomiting (RR 0.65 [95 percent CI 0.47-0.91]), and pruritus (RR 0.60 [0.37-0.98]), but not sedation (RR 1.25 [0.76-2.06]). There was no effect on time to discharge from hospital (MD—0.05 days [95 percent CI −0.31 to 0.20].Conclusions: The addition of gabapentinoids to perioperative multimodal analgesia decreases opioid consumption following lower limb arthroplasty, while also lowering rates of nausea, vomiting, and pruritus. Further study is required to evaluate the effect of gabapentinoid use on long-term opioid use and dependence.

Objective: The global burden of surgical vascular disease is increasing and with it, the need for cost-effective, accessible prognostic biomarkers to aid optimization of peri-operative outcomes. The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is emerging as a potential candidate biomarker for perioperative risk stratification. We therefore performed this systematic review and meta-analysis on the prognostic value of elevated preoperative NLR in vascular surgery. Methods: We searched Embase (Ovid), Medline (Ovid), and the Cochrane Library database from inception to June 2019. Screening was performed, and included all peer-reviewed original research studies reporting preoperative NLR in adult emergent and elective vascular surgical patients. Studies were assessed for bias and quality of evidence using a standardized tool. Meta-analysis was performed by general linear (mixed-effects) modelling where possible, and otherwise a narrative review was conducted. Between-study heterogeneity was estimated using the Chi-squared statistic and explored qualitatively. Results: Fourteen studies involving 5,652 patients were included. The overall methodological quality was good. Elevated preoperative NLR was associated with increased risk of long-term mortality (HR 1.40 [95%CI: 1.13-1.74], Chi-squared 60.3%, 7 studies, 3,637 people) and short-term mortality (OR: 3.08; 95%CI: 1.91-4.95), Chi-squared 66.59%, 4 studies, 945 people). Outcome measures used by fewer studies such as graft patency and amputation free survival were assessed via narrative review. Conclusions: NLR is a promising, readily obtainable, prognostic biomarker for mortality outcomes following vascular surgery. Heterogeneity in patient factors, severity of vascular disease, and type of vascular surgery performed renders direct comparison of outcomes from the current literature challenging. This systematic review supports further investigation for NLR measurement in pre-vascular surgical risk stratification. In particular, the establishment of a universally accepted NLR cut-off value is of importance in real-world implementation of this biomarker.

No abstract

Introduction:Triage at mass gatherings in Australia is commonly performed by staff members with first aid training. There have been no evaluations of the performance of first aid staff with respect to diagnostic accuracy or identification of presentations requiring ambulance transport to hospital.Hypothesis:It was hypothesized that triage decisions by first aid staff would be considered correct in at least 61% of presentations.Methods:A retrospective audit of 1,048 presentations to a single supplier of event health care services in Australia was conducted. The presentations were assessed based on the first measured set of physiological parameters, and the primary triage decision was classified as “expected” if the primary and secondary triage classifications were the same or “not expected” if they differed. The performance of the two triage systems was compared using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analysis.Results:The expected decision was made by first aid staff in 674 (71%) of presentations. Under-triage occurred in 131 (14%) presentations and over-triage in 142 (15%) presentations. The primary triage strategy had an AUROC of 0.7644, while the secondary triage strategy had an AUROC of 0.6280, which was significantly different (P = .0199).Conclusion:The results support the continued use of first aid trained staff members in triage roles at Australian mass gatherings. Triage tools should be simple, and the addition of physiological variables to improve the sensitivity of triage tools is not recommended because such an approach does not improve the discriminatory capacity of the tools.