This paper presents an overview of currently available methods for monitoring prestressing forces in prestressed concrete structure. Structural health monitoring has become an increasingly important tool for assessment of structural performance. Additionally, the value of the prestressing force represents an important parameter in prestressed concrete structures. Thus, several methods for monitoring prestress forces have emerged. This paper aims to consolidate the work performed in the area of prestressing force monitoring by presenting the most important advances and the directions for future research. The methods presented in this paper are based on indirect monitoring of the prestressing force through monitoring of another relevant parameter. They are divided into five general classes based on the relevant parameter they monitor:(a) vibration-based methods (based on acceleration), (b) impedance-based methods (based on electrical impedance), (c) acoustoelastic methods (based on wave velocity), (d) elasto-magnetic methods (based on magnetic permeability), and (e) strain-based methods (based on strain). The paper presents a table summarizing the comparison between the methods based on defined criteria.
This study presents a method for on-site assessment of prestress losses in prestressed concrete structures. The study is motivated by the increased use of prestressed concrete, the importance of prestressing force levels as a parameter, and the lack of formalized methods for its on-site assessment. The proposed method uses strain measurements from long-gauge fiber optic sensors to study strain changes at the centroid of stiffness (i.e. centroid of composite section) of the cross-sections. Its advantages include (1) robustness to operational load on the structure caused by seasonal and daily temperature variations, in addition to loading; (2) rigorous quantification of uncertainties associated with measurements and parameters; and (3) applicability to a wide range of beam-like structures. The application of the method is illustrated through application to measurements collected over a 7-year period from strain sensors embedded in Streicker Bridge, a post-tensioned concrete pedestrian bridge on the Princeton University campus. Application of the method indicates that prestress losses measured by sensors are of comparable magnitude to design estimates, which implies that estimates are not necessarily overly conservative.
In civil structures and infrastructure, assessing true performance and characterizing unusual structural behaviors can help avoid severe structural problems. To further refine or validate the conclusions from structural health monitoring (SHM) analyses, nondestructive evaluation or techniques (NDE or NDT) can be applied in conjunction with SHM approaches. Ground penetrating radar (GPR) is an NDT that has been used to investigate defects and internal features in concrete structures, but is not commonly used to assess mechanical properties for the purposes of SHM. As a preliminary investigation of the effectiveness of attribute analysis techniques, a GPR survey was conducted on Streicker Bridge (a pedestrian bridge on Princeton University campus with embedded fiber-optic strain and temperature sensors). The bridge was constructed in two phases, where different curing conditions produced different material properties (compressive strength of 51 MPa and 59 MPa). Both standard processing techniques and attribute analysis techniques were employed to interpret GPR reflections in each phase of construction to identify construction elements and to compare the attribute signatures of different strength concretes.Though this study presents primarily relative differences, the sensitivity of these attributes to material property differences is confirmed. This validates SHM studies of the bridge and indicates the potential of the attribute analysis method for material characterization, especially as a compliment to other SHM and NDE techniques.
Structural health monitoring (SHM) consists of the continuous or periodic measurement of structural parameters and their analysis with the aim of deducing information about the performance and health condition of a structure. The significant increase in the construction of prestressed concrete bridges motivated this research on an SHM method for the on-site determination of the distribution of prestressing forces along prestressed concrete beam structures. The estimation of the distribution of forces is important as it can give information regarding the overall performance and structural integrity of the bridge. An inadequate transfer of the designed prestressing forces to the concrete cross-section can lead to a reduced capacity of the bridge and consequently malfunction or failure at lower loads than predicted by design. This paper researches a universal method for the determination of the distribution of prestressing forces along concrete beam structures at the time of transfer of the prestressing force (e.g., at the time of prestressing or post-tensioning). The method is based on the use of long-gauge fiber optic sensors, and the sensor network is similar (practically identical) to the one used for damage identification. The method encompasses the determination of prestressing forces at both healthy and cracked cross-sections, and for the latter it can yield information about the condition of the cracks. The method is validated on-site by comparison to design forces through the application to two structures: (1) a deck-stiffened arch and (2) a curved continuous girder. The uncertainty in the determination of prestressing forces was calculated and the comparison with the design forces has shown very good agreement in most of the structures' cross-sections, but also helped identify some unusual behaviors. The method and its validation are presented in this paper.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.