2019
DOI: 10.1002/stc.2374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Monitoring of prestressing forces in prestressed concrete structures—An overview

Abstract: This paper presents an overview of currently available methods for monitoring prestressing forces in prestressed concrete structure. Structural health monitoring has become an increasingly important tool for assessment of structural performance. Additionally, the value of the prestressing force represents an important parameter in prestressed concrete structures. Thus, several methods for monitoring prestress forces have emerged. This paper aims to consolidate the work performed in the area of prestressing for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The classification of some methods is questionable because the line between destructive, semi-destructive, and non-destructive approaches is narrow. In general, methods with no or only minimal impact on the structural integrity are considered non-destructive [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ]. Two main stress releasing methods are available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classification of some methods is questionable because the line between destructive, semi-destructive, and non-destructive approaches is narrow. In general, methods with no or only minimal impact on the structural integrity are considered non-destructive [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ]. Two main stress releasing methods are available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,15 Extensive SHM techniques have been applied to identify the presence, location, and severity of structural damage. [16][17][18][19] These techniques have been proposed by using various damage sensing features and diverse sensors. The existing damage indicators can be categorized as static [20][21][22] and dynamic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These should be sensitive to the local damage and insensitive to the ambient noise 14,15 . Extensive SHM techniques have been applied to identify the presence, location, and severity of structural damage 16–19 . These techniques have been proposed by using various damage sensing features and diverse sensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The growing interest in SHM for infrastructure operators and the recent technological progress have encouraged the research community to study and develop innovative sensors and monitoring methods. An incomplete list includes the Ground Penetration Radar (GPR), or Georadar [ 6 , 7 ], the Reflectometric Impulse Measurement Technology (RIMT) [ 8 , 9 , 10 ], the Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR) [ 11 , 12 ], the Strand-Cutting test [ 13 , 14 , 15 ], the Core Drilling Method (CDM) [ 16 , 17 ], and the Acoustic Emissions technique (AE) [ 18 ]. All these techniques have been studied in laboratory experiments and in-service structure monitoring; however, the absence of standardized procedures and the unavoidable need of experts to interpret results make these technologies unready for an extensive application on civil infrastructure yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%