Our introductory course in Organizational Behavior at the University of New Hampshire has evolved through several different stages over the last twelve years.Initially we relied primarily on lecture, then moved to a mixture of lecture and cases and, finally, relied heavily on experience-based methods.In the course of this development, cases often fell on hard times as they seemed to be at odds with the new experiential pedagogy. This led to conflicts over the relative merits of case vs. experiential methods and attempts to work out the right &dquo;mix&dquo; of cases and exercises.After much experimentation, we discovered a way to move beyond an &dquo;either-or&dquo; solution and toward a method of integrating cases with an experiential approach. This combines the personal involvement of experiential ' methods with the wide variety of situations and institutional settings available through cases. The method is deceptively simple! We structure the class period so that the manner in which the students discuss the case will parallel the major issue in the case. Since the class reflects characteristics which are representative of any organization, a structure can generally be created which parallels the case. By having the medium and the message tell the same story, the learning becomes very powerful. This approach has a further advantage in that it increases the willingness of students to examine their own experience. When they see that the issues contained in the case analyses are not dissimilar to the ones that they have just personally confronted, the threat in examining one's own behavior is reduced. This further permits the students to apply to themselves the concepts they are learning.One example that illustrates our process of integrating cases with experiential learning involves the &dquo;Case of the Changing Cage&dquo; . This is a sequential five part case. After each part, the student is.;asked to make predictions, read the next part to compare these with what actually happened and explain the reasons for any discrepancies. In this manner the student works his way through a dynamic situation of diagnosing, predicting, assessing, correcting.The case concerns a small work group of nine clerks under the supervision of a first-line supervisor, Ms. Dunn. The group is insulated from external influences by a wire enclosure reinforced by files to form a barrier to the prying eyes of the department head, Mr. Burke. The work group develops a stable culture in its isolation..In exchange for their autonomy, members of the cage group provide management with a reasonably high level of performance.As part of a larger change in work layout, the cage is relocated so that it is no longer isolated and insulated, but instead is subjected to the close scrutiny of Mr. Burke who frowns on many customs of the cage culture. The work group copes poorly with the change. Strain increases, performance falls and satisfaction decreases. The scenario is a familiar one, and the case is a classic.
Change in school systems often withers from lack of administrative support. The intervention described led to the creation of a new management structure for a public school system, with different decision-making processes, greater administrator involvement, and increased commitment to the total system. On the basis of this consulting experience, a number of propositions for change agents have been formulated, which are applicable to and can be tested in other settings.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.