The prognosis in advanced-stage ovarian cancer remains poor. Tumor-specific intraoperative fluorescence imaging may improve staging and debulking efforts in cytoreductive surgery and thereby improve prognosis. The overexpression of folate receptor-α (FR-α) in 90-95% of epithelial ovarian cancers prompted the investigation of intraoperative tumor-specific fluorescence imaging in ovarian cancer surgery using an FR-α-targeted fluorescent agent. In patients with ovarian cancer, intraoperative tumor-specific fluorescence imaging with an FR-α-targeted fluorescent agent showcased the potential applications in patients with ovarian cancer for improved intraoperative staging and more radical cytoreductive surgery.

Among patients with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer, the addition of HIPEC to interval cytoreductive surgery resulted in longer recurrence-free survival and overall survival than surgery alone and did not result in higher rates of side effects. (Funded by the Dutch Cancer Society; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00426257 ; EudraCT number, 2006-003466-34 .).

BACKGROUND Treatment of newly diagnosed advanced-stage ovarian cancer typically involves cytoreductive surgery and systemic chemotherapy. We conducted a trial to investigate whether the addition of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to interval cytoreductive surgery would improve outcomes among patients who were receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS In a multicenter, open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 245 patients who had at least stable disease after three cycles of carboplatin (area under the curve of 5 to 6 mg per milliliter per minute) and paclitaxel (175 mg per square meter of body-surface area) to undergo interval cytoreductive surgery either with or without administration of HIPEC with cisplatin (100 mg per square meter). Randomization was performed at the time of surgery in cases in which surgery that would result in no visible disease (complete cytoreduction) or surgery after which one or more residual tumors measuring 10 mm or less in diameter remain (optimal cytoreduction) was deemed to be feasible. Three additional cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel were administered postoperatively. The primary end point was recurrence-free survival. Overall survival and the side-effect profile were key secondary end points. RESULTS In the intention-to-treat analysis, events of disease recurrence or death occurred in 110 of the 123 patients (89%) who underwent cytoreductive surgery without HIPEC (surgery group) and in 99 of the 122 patients (81%) who underwent cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC (surgery-plus-HIPEC group) (hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death, 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50 to 0.87; P = 0.003). The median recurrencefree survival was 10.7 months in the surgery group and 14.2 months in the surgeryplus-HIPEC group. At a median follow-up of 4.7 years, 76 patients (62%) in the surgery group and 61 patients (50%) in the surgery-plus-HIPEC group had died (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.94; P = 0.02). The median overall survival was 33.9 months in the surgery group and 45.7 months in the surgery-plus-HIPEC group. The percentage of patients who had adverse events of grade 3 or 4 was similar in the two groups (25% in the surgery group and 27% in the surgery-plus-HIPEC group, P = 0.76). CONCLUSIONS Among patients with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer, the addition of HIPEC to interval cytoreductive surgery resulted in longer recurrence-free survival and overall survival than surgery alone and did not result in higher rates of side effects. (Funded by the Dutch Cancer Society; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00426257; EudraCT number, 2006-003466-34.)

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Purpose: Activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling pathway has been reported to induce resistance to (chemo)radiation in cancers, such as head and neck cancer, whereas EGFR-targeted agents in combination with (chemo)radiation seem to improve treatment efficacy. The aim of this study was to determine the relation between proteins involved in the EGFR pathway and response to (chemo)radiation and survival in a large, well-documented series of cervical cancer patients. Experimental Design: Pretreatment tissue samples of 375 consecutive International Federation of Gynecologists and Obstetricians stage Ib to IVa cervical cancer patients treated with (chemo)radiation between January 1980 and December 2006 were collected. Clinicopathologic and follow-up data were prospectively obtained during standard treatment and follow-up. Protein expression of EGFR, phosphorylated EGFR (pEGFR), PTEN, phosphorylated AKT, and phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (pERK) was assessed by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays. Results: EGFR staining was present in 35.3%, pEGFR in 19.7%, PTEN in 34.1%, phosphorylated AKT in 4.1%, and pERK in 29.2% of tumors. pEGFR staining was related to PTEN (P = 0.001) and pERK staining (P = 0.004). EGFR staining was inversely related to PTEN (P = 0.011). In multivariate analysis, membranous staining of EGFR [hazard ratio (HR), 1.84; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.20-2.82; P = 0.005] and cytoplasmic staining of pEGFR (HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.11-2.66; P = 0.016) were independent predictors of poor response to (chemo)radiation. Membranous EGFR staining also was an independent prognostic factor for poor disease-specific survival (HR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.09-2.17; P = 0.014). Conclusions: EGFR and pEGFR immunostainings are frequently observed and independently associated with poor response to therapy and disease-specific survival in cervical cancer patients primarily treated by (chemo)radiation. Our data present the EGFR pathway as a promising therapeutic target in already ongoing clinical trials. (Clin Cancer Res 2009;15(23):7389-97) Standard treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer has changed from radiotherapy alone to concurrent platinum-based chemoradiation. Despite this change, the 5-year survival in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer is still ∼52% (1). Currently, there are no (biological) markers available that accurately predict response to (chemo)radiation.Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is involved in the ErbB signaling pathway, which is often dysregulated in cancer. Autophosphorylation of EGFR to phosphorylated EGFR (pEGFR) leads to activation of two downstream pathways: the Ras/Raf/ mitogen-activated protein/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) kinase/ERK pathway and the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/ AKT pathway. PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homologue deleted on

No abstract