The objective of this observational study was to determine whether pre-operative transcranial Doppler measurements could identify patients at risk for early cerebral hyperperfusion following carotid endarterectomies. Fifty-five patients (mean age 64.4 years) with symptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis were included. Pre-operative transcranial Doppler measurements included middle cerebral artery blood flow velocities at normocapnia, pulsatility indices and estimation of the cerebro-vascular reserve capacity ipsilateral to the internal carotid artery stenosis. The percentage change in blood flow velocities before and at the end of the procedure was calculated. Early cerebral hyperperfusion was defined as an increase of mean blood flow velocity of more than 100% at the end of the carotid endarterectomy. Early cerebral hyperperfusion was observed in 9.2%. Cerebral hyperperfusion was seen in patients with a subtotal carotid artery stenosis in combination with reduced pre-operative blood flow velocity and pulsatility. The post-operative stroke incidence in patients with an early cerebral hyperperfusion was tenfold higher compared to patients who did not experience early hyperperfusion. A prospective clinical trial is warranted to determine whether transcranial Doppler parameters can be used to indicate patients at risk for reperfusion strokes following carotid endarterectomies.

Background: Drug therapy is important for controlling symptoms in Parkinson’s disease (PD). However, it often results in complex medication regimens and could easily lead to drug related problems (DRP), suboptimal adherence and reduced treatment efficacy. A structured medication review (SMR) could address these issues and optimize therapy, although little is known about clinical effects in PD patients. Objective: To analyze whether an SMR improves quality of life (QoL) in PD. Methods: In this multicenter randomized controlled trial, half of the 202 PD patients with polypharmacy received a community pharmacist-led SMR. The control group received usual care. Assessments at baseline, and after three and six months comprised six validated questionnaires. Primary outcome was PD specific QoL [(PDQ-39; range 0 (best QoL) – 100 (worst QoL)]. Secondary outcomes were disability score, non-motor symptoms, general health status, and personal care giver’s QoL. Furthermore, DRPs, proposed interventions, and implemented modifications in medication schedules were analyzed. Results: No improvement in QoL was seen six months after an SMR, with a non-significant treatment effect difference of 2.09 (–0.63;4.80) in favor of the control group. No differences were found in secondary outcomes. In total, 260 potential DRPs were identified (2.6 (±1.8) per patient), of which 62% led to drug therapy optimization. Conclusion: In the current setting, a community pharmacist-led SMR did not improve QoL in PD patients, nor improved other pre-specified outcomes.

Background: In order to tailor treatment to the individual patient, it is important to take the patients context and preferences into account, especially for older patients. We assessed the quality of information used in the decision-making process in different oncological MDTs and compared this for older (70 years) and younger patients. Patients and methods: Cross-sectional observations of oncological MDTs were performed, using an observation tool in a University Hospital. Primary outcome measures were quality of input of information into the discussion for older and younger patients. Secondary outcomes were the contribution of different team members, discussion time for each case and whether or not a treatment decision was formulated. Results: Five-hundred and three cases were observed. The median patient age was 63 year, 32% were 70. In both age groups quality of patient-centered information (psychosocial information and patient's view) was poor. There was no difference in quality of information between older and younger patients, only for comorbidities the quality of information for older patients was better. There was no significant difference in the contributions by team members, discussion time (median 3.54 min) or number of decision reached (87.5%). Conclusion: For both age groups, we observed a lack of patient-centered information. The only difference between the age groups was for information on comorbidities. There were also no differences in contributions by different team members, case discussion time or number of decisions. Decision-making in the observed oncological MDTs was mostly based on medical technical information.

Purpose For controlling symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD) together with treating additional comorbidities, patients often face complex medication regimens, with suboptimal adherence, drug-related problems, and diminished therapy efficacy as a common consequence. A medication review could potentially tackle these issues, among others by optimizing drug treatment. Even if no change in clinical outcomes is observed, this intervention might decrease health care costs by reducing drug-related problems and hospital admissions. This study aimed to gain more insight in the health benefits and costs of a structured medication review (SMR) in PD. Methods A cost-utility analysis was performed, based on a multicenter randomized controlled trial with 202 PD patients with polypharmacy. The intervention group received an SMR, whereas the control group received usual care. The intervention effect after 6 months of follow-up was presented as incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALY) using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. Costs were based on real-world data. Missing data was imputed using multiple imputation techniques. Bootstrapping was used to estimate the uncertainty in all health and economic outcomes. ResultsThe QALY gain in the intervention group compared to the control group was − 0.011 (95% CI − 0.043; 0.020). Incremental costs were €433 (95% CI − 873; 1687). When adapting a willingness-to-pay threshold of €20,000/QALY and €80,000/QALY, the probability of SMRs being cost-effective was 18% and 30%, respectively. Conclusion A community pharmacist-led SMR in PD patients in the current setting shows no apparent benefit and is not cost-effective after 6 months, compared to usual care. Trial registration Netherlands Trial Register, NL4360. Registered 17 March 2014.