Multidisciplinary decision-making in older patients with cancer, does it differ from younger patients?

Abstract

Background: In order to tailor treatment to the individual patient, it is important to take the patients context and preferences into account, especially for older patients. We assessed the quality of information used in the decision-making process in different oncological MDTs and compared this for older (70 years) and younger patients. Patients and methods: Cross-sectional observations of oncological MDTs were performed, using an observation tool in a University Hospital. Primary outcome measures were quality of input of information into the discussion for older and younger patients. Secondary outcomes were the contribution of different team members, discussion time for each case and whether or not a treatment decision was formulated. Results: Five-hundred and three cases were observed. The median patient age was 63 year, 32% were 70. In both age groups quality of patient-centered information (psychosocial information and patient's view) was poor. There was no difference in quality of information between older and younger patients, only for comorbidities the quality of information for older patients was better. There was no significant difference in the contributions by team members, discussion time (median 3.54 min) or number of decision reached (87.5%). Conclusion: For both age groups, we observed a lack of patient-centered information. The only difference between the age groups was for information on comorbidities. There were also no differences in contributions by different team members, case discussion time or number of decisions. Decision-making in the observed oncological MDTs was mostly based on medical technical information.

Necessity and influencing factors for integrating oral health in cancer care for older people: a narrative review

“…Additionally, there is a significant lack of expert oral healthcare providers for older people, and more so for patients undergoing different cancer treatments [ 10 , 59 ]. Studies show that limited interprofessional knowledge is a barrier for dentists and recommend capacity building for the increased number of skilled workforces to cater to the needs of older people with cancer [ 21 , 25 , 34 , 38 , 57 ]. The literature recommends innovative approaches to support geriatric dental care, e.g., adaptation of dental operatories for wheelchair accessibility, home visits, teledentistry, skill mix, minimally invasive dentistry, digital technology, electronic patient records, and use of digital tools and smart applications [ 38 , 55 ].…”

Shared decision-making in the Netherlands: Progress is made, but not for all. Time to become inclusive to patients

“…Systematic observations of oncology multidisciplinary team meetings revealed limited use of patient-centred information, such as (age-related) patient characteristics and patient preferences during the decision making process. Decision-making was mostly based on medical technical information [22][23]. Multidisciplinary team members themselves voiced the need for additional patientcentered information during their team meetings and the need for alternative team decision-making strategies e.g.…”

Exploring the Language Used to Describe Older Patients at Multidisciplinary Cancer Conferences

“…To date, little research has explored how MCCs depict older patients with attention to their frailty levels and geriatric considerations [8,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. This has left a major gap in our understanding of the impact of language on cancer care.…”