Background Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) has not only spawned a lot of stigma and discrimination towards its survivors but also to their corpses. We aimed to assess the magnitude and correlates of stigma in these survivors, on return to their communities. Methods This was a cross-sectional, hospital-based, exploratory study conducted by the postgraduate department of psychiatry, in collaboration with the postgraduate department of chest medicine, Govt. medical college, Srinagar. The study was performed among COVID-19 survivors, who attended the outpatient department after their discharge from the hospital. Socio-demographic characteristics were recorded through semi-structured proforma. Stigma was measured by the stigma questionnaire. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and regression analysis. Results A total of 91 survivors consented to participate in the study. Almost half (46.2%) of them were in the age group of 30–49 years and close to two-thirds (68.1%) were males. About three–fourths (74.7%) were from the urban background. The mean time from hospital discharge to study entry was 11.7±5.1 [Range(R) = 7–21] days. 98% of survivors provided at least one stigma endorsing response and the total mean stigma score was 28.5±7.1[R = 6–39]. The mean stigma sub-scores were highest for enacted stigma (7.6±1.8) [R = 2–9] and externalized stigma (15.0±4.1) [R = 1–20]. Enacted stigma was significantly high in males as compared to females. Enacted stigma and internalized stigma were both associated with education. Enacted stigma, externalized stigma, disclosure concerns, and total stigma was significantly associated with the occupation. Being unemployed and time since discharge were identified as independent predictors of total stigma. Conclusion Our study results showed high levels of enacted and externalized stigma among COVID-19 survivors. Enacted stigma was more among males and in those who were highly educated. Survivor centered and community-driven anti-stigma programs are the need of the hour to promote the recovery and community re-integration of these survivors.

There is evidence that elevated serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) and eosinophilia correlate well with allergic skin test reactivity. These parameters have been used as alternative methods to characterize atopic subjects. Skin test reactivity is the only measure used routinely in clinical practice in Kuwait to reflect atopy in asthma patients. This study examines the usefulness of the two other parameters of atopy in patients with asthma, and to determine the most common allergens involved in Kuwait. Between 1998 and 1999, 101 asthma patients and 33 healthy controls were recruited for this study. Skin sensitivity test, serum total and specific IgE, total blood eosinophil count (B-EOS), and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) tests were performed in patients and controls. Nine allergens known to be prevalent in this environment were selected for the skin test and specific IgE test. Spirometry was also measured. These parameters were repeated after 4 weeks of therapy in the patients only. Skin test reaction was positive in 81% of the patients, while total IgE above 200 kU/L was obtained in 63% of cases. B-EOS above 300 x 10(3)/L was found in 75% of cases. House dust mite reactivity (positivity) was the most frequently encountered skin allergy, occurring in 28% of the patients. IgE correlated positively with B-EOS and ECP. B-EOS similarly correlated positively with ECP. There was a negative correlation between ECP and forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) (% predicted) as expected. At least one positive parameter of atopy was found in 95% of the patients. In 48% of the patients, all three parameters of atopy were found to be positive. Skin test reactivity and elevated IgE were found together in 62% of the cases. This study reveals a significant degree of allergy among patients with asthma in this environment. Skin testing was found to be the most effective measure of atopy in this environment, and correlates well with the other more sensitive newer tests.

Aim and Objectives To describe the prevalence and characteristics of olfactory dysfunction (OD) in patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 infection. Materials and Methods This monocentric study was performed at Chest Diseases Hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic and all patients testing positive for COVID-19 over a 5-month period (April to August 2020) were recruited. Detailed history was elicited from subjects and all patients were inquired about olfactory dysfunction (OD). Patients with olfactory dysfunction were asked to complete olfactory questionnaires based on the short version of the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders-Negative Statements (sQOD-NS). Results 655 patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 infection were included in the study. The prevalence rate of olfactory dysfunction was 18.47% (n = 121) with contribution of 11.60% (n = 76) and 6.87% (n = 45) from anosmia and hyposmia respectively, thereby suggesting olfactory dysfunction to be a significant clinical feature in COVID-19 patients. Males were significantly more affected by olfactory dysfunctions than females. Anosmic patients had significantly reduced sQOD-NS results as compared to hyposmic patients (significant at P \ 0.05). The mean duration of OD was 7.7 days (± 4.3) and [90% patients in our study showed resolution within 14 days. Conclusion The early recognition of olfactory dysfunction should help to screen, identify and thereby quickly isolate mildly symptomatic COVID-19 patients from the general population and the existence of these dysfunctions may well be a prognostic factor in the course of the disease.

Systemic thickening of capillary endothelial basement membrane underlies the chronic complications of human diabetic microangiopathy. Since 99mTc-DTPA aerosol scintigraphy is a sensitive, non-invasive test of membrane permeability, we decided to study the effect of diabetes on the permeability of lung epithelium in diabetic patients using this test. Fifty (NIDDM) patients, aged 40-70 years, with or without complications, and who were non-smokers, were subjected to evaluation using 99mTc-DTPA aerosol. At the same time, pulmonary function tests, including carbon monoxide diffusion capacity, were done. Normal non-smoking subjects with no history of cardio-respiratory disease, who underwent 99mTc-DTPA and pulmonary function tests, served as controls. The risk factors which included age, sex, degree of control and presence of complications were noted. Twenty-nine (58%) of the patients had abnormal 99mTc-DTPA clearance. Thirty-four percent of the patients with complications and 24% of those without complications had abnormal clearance. Complications recorded included retinopathy, neuropathy and nephropathy. Fifty-five percent of patients with abnormal 99mTc-DTPA had suffered from diabetes for longer than 10 years. Sixty-two percent of patients with poor glycaemic control had abnormal 99mTc-DTPA. Diffusion capacity was not significantly affected in patients with complicated diabetes. Our preliminary results suggest that 99mTc-DTPA is a potentially sensitive test in assessing the degree of lung affection in diabetic patients. No significant correlation exists between diffusion capacity and 99mTc-DTPA. The risk factors did not affect the 99mTc-DTPA clearance, probably due to the small sample size.

There is evidence that eosinophils are involved in inflammation in asthma, a correlation having been observed between blood eosinophil (B-EOS) count and pulmonary function. It has been suggested that eosinophils, and its product, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), can serve as markers of disease activity. This paper examines this hypothesis. B-EOS count, serum ECP level, and peak expiratory flow (PEF) were estimated in two groups of asthmatics and controls at three visits in 4 weeks. The mean B-EOS count in acute and stable asthmatic groups was higher than in controls at presentation; the difference was statistically significant (p<0.02). Similarly, mean ECP was higher in the two groups than in controls, but with no statistically significant difference. The B-EOS count and serum ECP level within the groups fell between week 0 and week 4 because of treatment. There was positive correlation between ECP and PEF and also between B-EOS and ECP and PEF. The findings reveal that blood eosinophils reflect some degree of activity in asthmatic patients in the acute and chronic state.

No abstract

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> COVID-19 has led to the global pandemic which started in Wuhan, in China. It is highly contagious and the presenting symptoms may not alarm the patient or the doctor and can be confused with allergies and other simple viral respiratory tract infections in mild cases. Aim of this study was to evaluate the various presentations of COVID-19 patients in department of otorhinolaryngology.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> This study was done during pandemic, from March 2020 to May 2020 for a period of 3 months in government medical college Srinagar. If the patient had any significant travel or contact with the known or suspected COVID-19 positive patient and the various ENT symptoms with which COVID positive patients presented, to the department were evaluated.  </p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Majority of patients were males between the age group of 21 to 40 years. The most common symptoms encountered was cough and fever followed by sore throat and rhinitis. One patient also presented with subacute thyroiditis and two others as neck abscess. Two patients presented with sudden sensorineural hearing loss.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Patients in the department can present with mild respiratory tract infection or also with some peculiar symptoms of subacute thyroiditis or abcess. So, careful history is the key to recognize these patients. And it is highly recommended that doctors during addressing the patients should be in proper protective kits to avoid contracting the disease.</p>

No abstract