Aims: To assess the effects of (1) mydriasis and (2) single versus three field photography on screening for diabetic eye disease using digital photography Method: Slit lamp examination findings were compared to digital fundal photographs for the detection of any retinopathy and for referable retinopathy in 398 patients (794 eyes). A Topcon TRC-NW6S digital non-mydriatic fundus camera was used. Three photographic strategies were used: undilated single field, dilated single field, and dilated multiple fields. The photographs were presented in random order to one of two retinal screeners. For the single field photographs the screeners were masked to the use of mydriatics. In 13% of fundal photographs, grading was performed by both, rather than just one grader. Results: Mydriasis reduced the proportion of ungradable photographs from 26% to 5% (p,0.001). Neither mydriasis nor three field photography improved the sensitivity or specificity for the detection of any retinopathy or of referable retinopathy when compared with undilated single field photography. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting referable retinopathy using undilated single field photography was 77% (95% CI 71 to 84) and 95 % (95% CI 93 to 97) respectively. Using dilated single field photography the figures were 81% (95% CI 76 to 87) and 92% (95% CI 90 to 94) respectively. Using dilated three field photography the figures were 83% (95% CI 78 to 88) and 93% (95% CI 91 to 96) respectively. Intergrader reliability for the detection of referable retinopathy in gradable photographs was excellent (Kappa values 0.86-1.00). Conclusions: Mydriasis reduces the technical failure rate. Mydriasis and the three field photography as used in this study do not increase the sensitivity or specificity of detecting diabetic retinopathy.

The incidence of orbital cellulitis is higher in children than in adults. In children, it commonly follows upper respiratory infection and sinus disease; however, in adults, preceding illness and trauma are more common. Respiratory pathogens are common in affected children. Intravenous antibiotics and surgical treatment of abscesses remain the preferred management.

The drop test was found to provide a simple and repeatable method of assessing lacrimal drainage in a minimally invasive manner in the clinical setting. In healthy volunteers in the supine position 60% of maximal lacrimal outflow capacity occurs through the inferior canaliculus.

The results presented give a sensitivity of 86%, specificity of 68%, and positive predictive value of 50% for the use of ultrasound in the diagnosis of GCA. Conclusions This preliminary study indicates that this test may be helpful in those patients with symptoms suggestive of GCA, but currently we cannot recommend any change of present practice.

Meesmann epithelial corneal dystrophy (MECD) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder caused by dominant-negative mutations within the KRT3 or KRT12 genes, which encode the cytoskeletal protein keratins K3 and K12, respectively. To investigate the pathomechanism of this disease, we generated and phenotypically characterized a novel knock-in humanized mouse model carrying the severe, MECD-associated, K12-Leu132Pro mutation. Although no overt changes in corneal opacity were detected by slit-lamp examination, the corneas of homozygous mutant mice exhibited histological and ultrastructural epithelial cell fragility phenotypes. An altered keratin expression profile was observed in the cornea of mutant mice, confirmed by western blot, RNA-seq and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Mass spectrometry (MS) and immunohistochemistry demonstrated a similarly altered keratin profile in corneal tissue from a K12-Leu132Pro MECD patient. The K12-Leu132Pro mutation results in cytoplasmic keratin aggregates. RNA-seq analysis revealed increased chaperone gene expression, and apoptotic unfolded protein response (UPR) markers, CHOP and Caspase 12, were also increased in the MECD mice. Corneal epithelial cell apoptosis was increased 17-fold in the mutant cornea, compared with the wild-type (P < 0.001). This elevation of UPR marker expression was also observed in the human MECD cornea. This is the first reporting of a mouse model for MECD that recapitulates the human disease and is a valuable resource in understanding the pathomechanism of the disease. Although the most severe phenotype is observed in the homozygous mice, this model will still provide a test-bed for therapies not only for corneal dystrophies but also for other keratinopathies caused by similar mutations.

Purpose We aimed to determine the reasons for, and variables which predicted, ungradeable retinal photographs during screening patients for diabetic retinopathy. Materials and methods Age, duration of diabetes, visual acuity, and HbA1c were recorded. Following dark adaptation, a single 451 nonmydriatic photograph was taken of each fundus. The pupils were then dilated and the photograph repeated. Using slit lamp biomicroscopy, lenticular changes (LOCS III), and fundus appearance were recorded. Results In ungradeable photographs the fovea could not be visualised in 98% of cases of images from nonmydriatic photography, and in 88% if mydriasis was used. Poor definition in the nonmydriatic image was associated with a subsequent ungradeable mydriatic photograph (P ¼ 0.001), however, the positive predictive value was poor (34%). Age, posterior subcapsular cataract, and near vision predicted ungradeable status of nonmydriatic photographs (Po0.001, P ¼ 0.004, P ¼ 0.006, respectively; regression analysis). Nuclear colour and poor definition of the nonmydriatic photograph predicted ungradeable status of mydriatic photographs (P ¼ 0.006 & P ¼ 0.001, respectively). Conclusion Inability to visualise the fovea is the commonest cause of an ungradeable image from digital retinal photography. Age and posterior subcapsular cataract were best predictors of ungradeable status of nonmydriatic fundus photographs. Nuclear colour was the strongest predictor for ungradeable mydriatic photography.

We present a case of a 56-year-old man who suffered an injury to his right eye in June 2012. He presented to an emergency department, however, the presence of a penetrating injury and an intraocular foreign body was not identified. A year later he was referred to the ophthalmology department due to reduced vision and change of iris colour in the same eye. Examination revealed clinical signs consistent with a previous penetrating injury and a retained ferrous intraocular foreign body.

Many patients attending diabetic eye screening return to driving and work immediately after the appointment. Introduction of the use of routine drops may discourage attendance. Education and experience may have an important role in improving acceptability of mydriatic eye drops. Retinal screeners need to have clear guidelines with which to advise patients.