Zika virus (ZIKV) has been associated to central nervous system (CNS) harm, and virus was detected in the brain and cerebrospinal fluids of microcephaly and meningoencephalitis cases. However, the mechanism by which the virus reaches the CNS is unclear. Here, we addressed the effects of ZIKV replication in human brain microvascular endothelial cells (HBMECs), as an in vitro model of blood brain barrier (BBB), and evaluated virus extravasation and BBB integrity in an in vivo mouse experimental model. HBMECs were productively infected by African and Brazilian ZIKV strains (ZIKVMR766 and ZIKVPE243), which induce increased production of type I and type III IFN, inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. Infection with ZIKVMR766 promoted earlier cellular death, in comparison to ZIKVPE243, but infection with either strain did not result in enhanced endothelial permeability. Despite the maintenance of endothelial integrity, infectious virus particles crossed the monolayer by endocytosis/exocytosis-dependent replication pathway or by transcytosis. Remarkably, both viruses' strains infected IFNAR deficient mice, with high viral load being detected in the brains, without BBB disruption, which was only detected at later time points after infection. These data suggest that ZIKV infects and activates endothelial cells, and might reach the CNS through basolateral release, transcytosis or transinfection processes. These findings further improve the current knowledge regarding ZIKV dissemination pathways.

No abstract

1 We examined bone-marrow in mice receiving subcutaneous implants of heat-coagulated egg white, which are known to present chronic eosinophilic inflammation at the implant site. Egg white implants (EWIs) induced marked bone-marrow eosinophilia, and increased bone-marrow cell responses to granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and interleukin-5 in culture. These effects were observed as early as 24 h and lasted for, at least, 30 days in implant recipients. 2 We found, however, that increased eosinophil production was also observed in control mice which underwent surgery but received no EWI (sham-implanted mice), up to 15 days post-surgery. As this suggests an important contribution of nonspecific stress mechanisms to eosinopoiesis, we further evaluated the role of stress hormones produced by the adrenal glands in the bone-marrow eosinophilia of sham-implanted mice. 3 Bone-marrow eosinophilia in mice undergoing surgery was dissociated from increases in other haemopoietic lineages. Surgery by itself increased circulating corticosterone levels by 24 h, and the increase was prevented by inhibition of adrenal glucocorticoid production by metyrapone. The effect of surgery on bone-marrow eosinophilia was prevented by pretreatment with both the glucocorticoid receptor antagonist, mifepristone, and metyrapone, and by surgical adrenalectomy. 4 By contrast, cathecolamine receptor antagonists (propranolol, prazosin and yohimbine) were ineffective, indicating that cathecolamine release from the adrenal glands was not responsible for the effects on bone-marrow. 5 These results highlight a critical role for stress-induced glucocorticoid hormones in selectively upregulating bone-marrow eosinopoiesis in mice submitted to surgery.

Overweight and obesity have become epidemic worldwide and are linked to sedentary lifestyle and the consumption of processed foods and drinks. Citrate is a metabolite that plays central roles in carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. In addition, citrate is the additive most commonly used by the food industry, and therefore is highly consumed. Extracellular citrate can freely enter the cells via the constitutively expressed plasma membrane citrate transporter. Within the cytosol, citrate is readily metabolised by ATP-citrate lyase into acetyl-CoA -the metabolic precursor of endogenously produced lipids and cholesterol. We therefore hypothesised that the citrate ingested from processed foods and drinks could contribute to increased postprandial fat production and weight gain. To test our hypothesis, we administered citrate to mice through their drinking water with or without sucrose and monitored their weight gain and other metabolic parameters. Our results showed that mice receiving citrate or citrate + sucrose did not show increased weight gain or an increase in the weight of the liver, skeletal muscles or adipose tissues (AT). Moreover, the plasma lipid profiles (TAG, total cholesterol, LDL and HDL) were similar across all groups. However, the group receiving citrate + sucrose showed augmented fasting glycaemia, glucose intolerance and the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-10) in their AT. Therefore, our results suggest that citrate consumption contributes to increased AT inflammation and altered glucose metabolism, which is indicative of initial insulin resistance. Thus, citrate consumption could be a previously unknown causative agent for the complications associated with obesity.Key words: Citrate: Obesity: Inflammation: Food additives: Insulin resistance: Diabetes Overweight and obesity are currently a threat to public health. The number of overweight and obese individuals has more than doubled since 1980, and it is estimated that 39 % of the world population is overweight and 13 % are obese (1,2) . This epidemic is largely attributed to the modern sedentary lifestyle and a 'westernised' diet, based on the consumption of caloric and processed foods and drinks. In that sense, much attention has been given to the contribution of the high fat and high sugar contents of modern food (3) . Meanwhile, the relative contribution of food additives has been largely ignored, possibly because of their negligible energy content and the assumption that food additives are metabolically inert.Citrate is the most widely used additive in the food industry, as it is a very efficient food flavouring agent and preservative (4) . Citrate has been considered innocuous, despite the fact that it is a very important metabolite in virtually all cell types. Citrate is produced in the mitochondria in the first reaction of the Krebs cycle through the condensation of one acetyl-CoA and one oxaloacetate molecule. In a situation of excess energy (postprandially), citrate accumulates and is then expo...

Food additives are compounds used in order to improve food palatability, texture, and shelf life. Despite a significant effort to assure safety of use, toxicological analysis of these substances, generally, rely on their direct toxicity to target organs (liver and kidney) or their genotoxic effects. Much less attention is paid to the effects of these compounds on cells of the immune system. This is of relevance given that metabolic dysregulation and obesity have a strong immune-mediated component. Obese individuals present a state of chronic low-grade inflammation that contributes to the establishment of insulin resistance and other metabolic abnormalities known as the metabolic syndrome. Obesity and metabolic syndrome are currently recognized as worldwide epidemics that pose a profound socioeconomic impact and represent a concern to public health. Cells of the immune system contribute to both the maintenance of “lean homeostasis” and the metabolic dysregulation observed in obese individuals. Although much attention has been drawn in the past decades to obesity and metabolic syndrome as a result of ingesting highly processed food containing large amounts of fat and simple sugars, mounting evidence suggest that food additives may also be important contributors to metabolic derangement. Herein, we review pieces of evidence from the literature showing that food additives have relevant effects on cells of the immune system that could contribute to immune-mediated metabolic dysregulation. Considering their potential to predispose individuals to develop obesity and metabolic syndrome, their use should be taken with caution or maybe revisited.

No abstract

No abstract

Neutrophils are circulating leukocytes with great cytotoxic potential, responsible for the first combat against invading pathogens. Their accumulation in tissues must be highly controlled so that the number of neutrophils delivered to the affected site is sufficient to control infection with minimum injury to the surrounding healthy tissue. In sepsis, neutrophil migration is dysregulated - resulting in insufficient delivery of neutrophils to the infectious site and massive neutrophil accumulation in uninfected organs. This dysregulation has the potential to cause inappropriate tissue injury that may explain the multiple organ dysfunction observed in severe sepsis. A better understanding of the mechanisms that contribute to this process is fundamental to design therapeutic strategies to circumvent tissue injury and organ dysfunction in sepsis.