The interplay of private and public reactions to the crisis of September 11th in New York is analyzed as an example of well-functioning populist politics. Using material from observations, interviews and a content analysis of "The New York Times" obituaries, the sequence of reactions to the catastrophe of September 11th 2001 in New York City is described. The wish for nearness and reassurance was followed by a wish 'to do something'. The latter, by necessity frustrated for most, was turned into identification with the new heroes who could 'do something': fire-fighters, steel-workers, and the politicians who presented themselves as organizers of their efforts. Analysis then concentrates on how these 'private wishes' were used for 'public politics' of a populist kind. Cultural norms and assumptions about family, community and masculinity were utilized for the mobilization of political attitudes of patriarchal protection, patriotism and retaliation. Social differences of victimization were denied (where in fact it can be shown that the financial upper class paid the highest toll) with the effect of creating the perfect 'populist moment' out of the situation on the basis of actual needs and sentiments. Copyright Joint Editors and Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2003.
The hegemonic use of the war metaphor, especially in the field of `crime and punishment', is explained by its usefulness for the `populist structure' of politics. Warfare, punishment and policing are three different forms of the state monopoly of force with different logics and restrictions. The universalization of the experience of war is examined historically. Military basic training is a training in helplessness and authoritarianism. The `process of civilization' has led to war as mass destruction of population and infrastructure in the 20th century. In the populist appeal, value orientations such as `(patriarchal) family/community' and `warrior/masculinity' are mobilized. Populist politics connects these social values to `warfare' as well as to `crime and punishment'.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.