The displacement argument is the dominant explanation for the phenomenon of trained individuals out-qualifying the less educated in job competition. Decreasing employment opportunities are seen as a labour-market matching problem.The explanation given in this paper is'stigmatizationby negative selection'. It takes into account that educational expansion has not only changed the number of less-educated people, but also the 'quality' of the less-educated group^due to changes in its group composition caused by increasing selection in the educational system, employers' perceptions, and ultimately employers' human resource management of this group. Thus, shrinking employment opportunitities for less-educated people are not only derived from distributional but behavioural changes.Whereas the displacement argument is mainly based on labour-market disequilibrium in terms of quantity, the'stigmabyselection'argumentconsiders qualitative changes in this relationship between individuals and their environment. The ranking process is expanded into a 'sorting-out' process for the less-educated group which begins in school. The main argument is that following educational expansion, employers increasingly trust the sorting function of schools and teachers' evaluation, resulting in an exclusion of the less well educated.The empirical ¢ndings based onWest German data correspond to the theoretical reasoning of the 'stigma by selection'argument.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.