In adult rodents, neurons are continually generated in the subventricular zone of the forebrain, from where they migrate tangentially toward the olfactory bulb, the only known target for these neuronal precursors. Within the main olfactory bulb, they ascend radially into the granule and periglomerular cell layers, where they differentiate mainly into local interneurons. The functional consequences of this permanent generation and integration of new neurons into existing circuits are unknown. To address this question, we used neural cell adhesion molecule-deficient mice that have documented deficits in the migration of olfactory-bulb neuron precursors, leading to about 40% size reduction of this structure. Our anatomical study reveals that this reduction is restricted to the granule cell layer, a structure that contains exclusively ␥-aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic interneurons. Furthermore, mutant mice were subjected to experiments designed to examine the behavioral consequences of such anatomical alteration. We found that the specific reduction in the newly generated interneuron population resulted in an impairment of discrimination between odors. In contrast, both the detection thresholds for odors and short-term olfactory memory were unaltered, demonstrating that a critical number of bulbar granule cells is crucial only for odor discrimination but not for general olfactory functions.cell adhesion molecules ͉ neurogenesis ͉ interneurons ͉ ␥-aminobutyric acid (GABA)
Healthy subjects with normal nasal resistance breathe almost exclusively through the nose during sleep. This study tested the hypothesis that a mechanical advantage might explain this preponderance of nasal over oral breathing during sleep.A randomised, single-blind, crossover design was used to compare upper airway resistance during sleep in the nasal and oral breathing conditions in 12 (seven male) healthy subjects with normal nasal resistance, aged 30¡4 (mean¡SEM) yrs, and with a body mass index of 23¡1 kg?m 2 . During wakefulness, upper airway resistance was similar between the oral and nasal breathing routes. However, during sleep (supine, stage two) upper airway resistance was much higher while breathing orally (median 12.4 In a recent publication the authors described, for the first time, partitioning of inhaled ventilation between the nose and mouth during sleep in healthy subjects with normal nasal resistance [1]. The main finding of the latter study was that the oral fraction of inhaled ventilation during sleep was very small, averaging only 4% for the group of 10 subjects, and several subjects did not breathe through their mouth at all during sleep. Furthermore, the inhaled oral fraction did not change significantly between different non-rapid eye movement sleep stages or between rapid eye movement (REM) and non-REM sleep.The physiological explanation for the marked predominance of nasal ventilation over oral ventilation during sleep in normal subjects is unknown. Since total airway resistance while awake and breathing through the mouth is typically 2-4 cmH 2 O?L -1 ?s -1 [2] and the normal nasal resistance alone is of similar magnitude [3], it is not intuitively obvious why healthy subjects should choose to breathe almost exclusively through the nasal route during sleep. Specifically, there are no published measurements describing the effect of oral versus nasal breathing on upper airway resistance during sleep.It is important to understand the influence of the breathing route (oral or nasal) on upper airway resistance during sleep from the perspective of understanding normal respiratory physiology during sleep, but this information may also provide an insight into the relationship between the breathing route and upper airway obstruction during sleep. The authors hypothesised that the observed preponderance of nasal over oral ventilation in normal subjects during sleep would reflect a mechanical advantage of the nasal breathing route. To test this hypothesis, the authors compared upper airway resistance during nasal breathing and during oral breathing in healthy sleeping subjects with normal nasal resistance. Methods Study designA randomised, single blind, crossover study was conducted to compare upper airway resistance during sleep when nose breathing with that when mouth breathing. Subjects underwent a single overnight polysomnogram at Kingston General Hospital Sleep Laboratory, Ontario. The night was divided into two parts, oral breathing and nasal breathing, the order being randomised...
1. Activity-dependent plasticity of GABAergic synaptic transmission was investigated in neonatal rat hippocampal slices obtained between postnatal day (P) 2-10 using intracellular recording techniques. In all experiments, AMPA receptors were blocked by continual application of CNQX (10 /M 4. Both LTPGABAA and LTDGABAA were specific to the conditioned pathway and could be sequentially expressed at the same synapses. Potentiation of GABAergic synaptic efficacy was induced more easily following previous induction of LTDGABAA than in naive slices. 5. In conclusion, early in development, bidirectional synaptic plasticity is expressed by GABAA receptors and the activation (or not) of NMDA receptors determines the induction of either LTPGABAA or LTDGABAA.Activity-dependent synaptic plasticity may underlie seemingly diverse phenomena such as learning and memory and the maturation of neuronal networks, and may also be involved in the manifestation of pathophysiological conditions such as epilepsy and ischaemia. The now classical model for studies of synaptic plasticity in adult tissue is long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD) of excitatory glutamatergic transmission. In the hippocampus, LTP is usually induced by high frequency train stimulation (tetanic stimulation) or by a pairing protocol involving presynaptic afferent stimulation and postsynaptic membrane depolarization, whereas induction
Metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors are promising targets to treat numerous brain disorders. So far, allosteric modulators are the only subtype selective ligands, but pure agonists still have strong therapeutic potential. Here, we aimed at investigating the possibility of developing subtype-selective agonists by extending the glutamate-like structure to hit a nonconsensus binding area. We report the properties of the first mGlu4-selective orthosteric agonist, derived from a virtual screening hit, LSP4-2022 using cell-based assays with recombinant mGlu receptors [EC(50): 0.11 ± 0.02, 11.6 ± 1.9, 29.2 ± 4.2 μM (n>19) in calcium assays on mGlu4, mGlu7, and mGlu8 receptors, respectively, with no activity at the group I and -II mGlu receptors at 100 μM]. LSP4-2022 inhibits neurotransmission in cerebellar slices from wild-type but not mGlu4 receptor-knockout mice. In vivo, it possesses antiparkinsonian properties after central or systemic administration in a haloperidol-induced catalepsy test, revealing its ability to cross the blood-brain barrier. Site-directed mutagenesis and molecular modeling was used to identify the LSP4-2022 binding site, revealing interaction with both the glutamate binding site and a variable pocket responsible for selectivity. These data reveal new approaches for developing selective, hydrophilic, and brain-penetrant mGlu receptor agonists, offering new possibilities to design original bioactive compounds with therapeutic potential.
1. We investigated the effects of the selective gamma-aminobutyric acid-B (GABAB) receptor antagonist, P-3 aminopropyl-P-diethoxymethyl phosphoric acid (CGP 35348), on spontaneous and evoked postsynaptic potentials (PSPs) and currents (PSCs) in CA3 pyramidal cells and interneurons of hippocampal slices obtained between postnatal day 3 and 7 with the use of intracellular and whole cell recording techniques. The intracellular pipette solution contained either 2 M CsCl or 50 mM 2(triethylamino)-N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl) acetamine (QX314) dissolved in 2 M KMeSO4. Cesium and QX314 block postsynaptic responses mediated by GABAB receptors. 2. Under control conditions, bath application of CGP 35348 (0.5-1 mM) progressively increased the duration of spontaneous and evoked polysynaptic giant GABAergic PSPs leading to the appearance of ictal-like discharges. The effects of CGP 35348 were dose dependent and voltage independent. 3. In CA3 pyramidal neurons, CGP 35348 (0.5 mM) had no effect on monosynaptic GABAergic inhibitory PSPs (IPSPs) that were isolated in the presence of ionotropic glutamate receptor antagonists 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX, 10 microM) and D(-)2-amino-5-phosphovaleric acid (D-APV, 50 microM). Similarly, CGP 35348 (0.5 mM) had no effect on monosynaptic glutamatergic excitatory PSPs (EPSPs) that were isolated in the presence of bicuculline (10 microM) and high divalent cation artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF; 6 mM Mg2+/4 mM Ca2+). 4. In CA3 pyramidal neurons exposed to CNQX (20 microM) and D-APV (50 microM), application of the potassium channel blocker 4-aminopyridine (4-AP, 50 microM) generated synchronous giant GABAergic PSPS that were blocked in the presence of high divalent cation ACSF (6 mM Mg2+/4 mM Ca2+) or bicuculline (10 microM). The duration of these synchronous GABAergic PSPs was prolonged in the presence of CGP 35348 (0.5 mM) but did not lead to the appearance of ictal-like discharges. 5. In the presence of bicuculline, interictal giant glutamatergic potentials were observed in simultaneously recorded CA3 pyramidal cells and interneurons. CGP 35348 (0.5 mM) progressively increased the duration of these bicuculline-induced glutamatergic bursts leading to the simultaneous appearance of ictal discharges in both pyramidal cells and interneurons. 6. These results suggest that in the neonatal CA3 hippocampal region, when synchronous giant polysynaptic GABAergic PSPs are present (i.e., under basal, control conditions), spontaneously released GABA reaches a critical level and activates GABAB receptors on both pyramidal cells and interneurons thus regulating the level of glutamatergic and GABAergic activity in the CA3 neuronal network.
An association between mouth breathing during sleep and increased propensity for upper airway collapse is well documented, but the effect of treatment for nasal obstruction on mouth breathing during sleep and simultaneous obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) severity has not been described previously.A randomised single blind placebo-and sham-controlled crossover study of treatment (topical decongestant and external dilator strip) for nasal obstruction was carried out in 10 patients (nine males; mean¡SEM 46¡5 yrs) with nasal obstruction and OSA. All patients had normal acoustic pharyngometry. The effect of treatment on nasal resistance, mouth breathing during sleep and OSA severity was quantified.Treatment of nasal obstruction was associated with a dramatic and sustained reduction in nasal resistance and the oral fraction of ventilation during sleep (mean (95% confidence interval) absolute reduction in oral fraction 30% (12-49)). Improvements in sleep architecture were observed during active treatment, and there was a modest reduction in OSA severity (change in apnoea-hypopnoea index 12 (3-22)).In conclusion, treating nasal obstruction reduced mouth breathing during sleep and obstructive sleep apnoea severity, but did not effectively alleviate obstructive sleep apnoea.
Antibodies have enormous therapeutic and biotechnology potential. G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), the main targets in drug development, are of major interest in antibody development programs. Metabotropic glutamate receptors are dimeric GPCRs that can control synaptic activity in a multitude of ways. Here we identify llama nanobodies that specifically recognize mGlu2 receptors, among the eight subtypes of mGluR subunits. Among these nanobodies, DN10 and 13 are positive allosteric modulators (PAM) on homodimeric mGlu2, while DN10 displays also a significant partial agonist activity. DN10 and DN13 have no effect on mGlu2-3 and mGlu2-4 heterodimers. These PAMs enhance the inhibitory action of the orthosteric mGlu2/mGlu3 agonist, DCG-IV, at mossy fiber terminals in the CA3 region of hippocampal slices. DN13 also impairs contextual fear memory when injected in the CA3 region of hippocampal region. These data highlight the potential of developing antibodies with allosteric actions on GPCRs to better define their roles in vivo.
In the adult central nervous system, GABAergic synaptic inhibition is known to play a crucial role in preventing the spread of excitatory glutamatergic activity. This inhibition is achieved by a membrane hyperpolarization through the activation of postsynaptic gamma-aminobutyric acidA (GABAA) and GABAB receptors. In addition, GABA also depress transmitter release acting through presynaptic GABAB receptors. Despite the wealth of data regarding the role of GABA in regulating the degree of synchronous activity in the adult, little is known about GABA transmission during early stages of development. In the following we report that GABA mediates most of the excitatory drive at early stages of development in the hippocampal CA3 region. Activation of GABAA receptors induces a depolarization and excitation of immature CA3 pyramidal neurons and increases intracellular Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i)] during the first postnatal week of life. During the same developmental period, the postsynaptic GABAB-mediated inhibition is poorly developed. In contrast, the presynaptic GABAB-mediated inhibition is well developed at birth and plays a crucial role in modulating the postsynaptic activity by depressing transmitter release at early postnatal stages. We have also shown that GABA plays a trophic role in the neuritic outgrowth of cultured hippocampal neurons.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.