This article explores the role of consumer guilt in a retail context. The results of a field study indicate that a consumer's lack of purchase can lead to a guilt response when social connectedness with a salesperson exists and the consumer perceives he or she has control over the purchase decision. A subsequent laboratory study established that when consumers experience guilt, they intend to pursue reparative actions during future purchase interactions with the salesperson to reciprocate the initial connection they established. This reparation is directed specifically toward the salesperson and not the firm.
With the goal to improve the effectiveness and impact of communication messages delivered by social marketers, this research focuses on understanding variables that may be relevant in developing effective social marketing messages for the substantive domain of disposable plastic bottled water consumption. The authors examine the affective states associated with different stages of consumer change related to wasteful repetitive consumption behavior (i.e., disposable plastic bottled water consumption). With two empirical studies, the authors identify guilt, hope, pride, and optimism as relevant triggers of increased intent to manage personal consumption in pursuit of a desirable social outcome (i.e., reduction of disposable plastic bottled water consumption). While guilt, hope, and pride are relevant self-referential emotions to initial stages of change (Study 1), optimism is a principal construct in motivating people to adopt and maintain the behavior over time (Study 2). These results have valuable theoretical and practical implications for social marketers and public policy makers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.