Summary Low–salinity waterflooding (LSWF) is an emergent technology developed to increase oil recovery. Laboratory–scale testing of this process is common, but modeling at the production scale is less well–reported. Various descriptions of the functional relationship between salinity and relative permeability have been presented in the literature, with respect to the differences in the effective salinity range over which the mechanisms occur. In this paper, we focus on these properties and their impact on fractional flow of LSWF at the reservoir scale. We present numerical observations that characterize flow behavior accounting for dispersion. We analyzed linear and nonlinear functions relating salinity to relative permeability and various effective salinity ranges using a numerical simulator. We analyzed the effect of numerical and physical dispersion of salinity on the velocity of the waterflood fronts as an expansion of fractional–flow theory, which normally assumes shock–like behavior of water and concentration fronts. We observed that dispersion of the salinity profile affects the fractional–flow behavior depending on the effective salinity range. The simulator solution is equal to analytical predictions from fractional–flow analysis when the midpoint of the effective salinity range lies between the formation and injected salinities. However, retardation behavior similar to the effect of adsorption occurs when these midpoint concentrations are not coincidental. This alters the velocities of high– and low–salinity water fronts. We derived an extended form of the fractional–flow analysis to include the impact of salinity dispersion. A new factor quantifies a physical or numerical retardation that occurs. We can now modify the effects that dispersion has on the breakthrough times of high– and low–salinity water fronts during LSWF. This improves predictive ability and also reduces the requirement for full simulation.
Summary Numerical fidelity is required when using simulations to predict enhanced-oil-recovery (EOR) processes. In this paper, we investigate the conditions that lead to numerical errors when simulating low-salinity (LS) waterflooding (LSWF). We also examine how to achieve more accurate simulation results by scaling up the flow behavior in an effective manner. An implicit finite-difference numerical solver was used to simulate LSWF. The accuracy of the numerical solution has been examined as a function of changing the length of the grid cell and the timestep. Previously we have shown that numerical dispersion induces a physical retardation such that the LS front slows down while the formation water front speeds up. We also report for the first time that pulses can be generated as numerical artifacts in coarsely gridded simulations of LSWF. These effects reflect the interaction of dispersion, the effective-salinity range, and the use of upstream weighting during calculation, and can corrupt predictions of flow behavior. The effect of the size of the timestep was analyzed with respect to the Courant condition, traditionally related to explicit numerical schemes and also numerical stability conditions. We also investigated some of the nonlinear elements of the simulation model, such as the differences between the concentrations of connate water salinity and the injected brine, effective-salinity-concentration range, and the net mobility change on fluids through changing the salinity. We report that to avoid pulses it is necessary, but not sufficient, to meet the Courant condition relating timestep size to cell size. We have also developed two approaches that can be used to scale up simulations of LSWF and tackle the numerical problems. The first method is dependent on a mathematical relationship between the fractional flow, effective-salinity range, and the Péclet number and treats the effective-salinity range as a pseudofunction. The second method establishes an unconventional proxy method equivalent to pseudorelative permeabilities. A single table of pseudorelative permeability data can be used for a waterflood instead of two tables, as is usual for LSWF. This is a novel approach that removes the need for relative permeability interpolation during the simulation. Overall, by avoiding numerical errors, we help engineers to more efficiently and accurately assess the potential for improving oil recovery using LSWF and thus optimize field development. We also avoid the numerical pulses inherent in the traditional LSWF model.
Summary Low-salinity waterflooding (LSWF) is a promising process that could lead to increased oil recovery. To date, the greatest attention has been paid to the complex oil/water/rock chemical reactions that might explain the mechanisms of LSWF, and it is generally accepted that these result in behavior equivalent to changing oil and water mobility. This behavior is modeled using an effective salinity range and weighting function to gradually switch from high- to low-salinity relative permeability curves. There has been limited attention on physical transport of fluids during LSWF, particularly at large scale. We focus on how the salinity profile interacts with water fronts through the effective salinity range and dispersion to alter the transport behavior and change the flow velocities, particularly for the salinity profile. We examined a numerical simulation of LSWF at the reservoir scale. Various representations of the effective salinity range and weighting function were also examined. The dispersion of salinity was compared with a theoretical form of numerical dispersion based on input parameters. We also compared salinity movement with the analytical solution of the conventional dispersion/advection equation. From simulations we observed that salinity is dispersed as analytically predicted, although the advection velocity might be changed. In advection-dominated flow, the salinity profile moves at the speed of the injected water. However, as dispersion increases, the mixing zone falls under the influence of the faster-moving formation water and, thus, speeds up. To predict the salinity profile theoretically, we have modified the advection term of the analytical solution as a function of the formation- and injected-water velocities, Péclet number, and effective salinity range. This important result enables prediction of the salinity transport by this newly derived modification of the analytical solution for 1D flow. We can understand the correction to the flow behavior and quantify it from the model input parameters. At the reservoir scale, we typically simulate flow on coarse grids, which introduces numerical dispersion or must include physical dispersion from underlying heterogeneity. Corrections to the equations can contribute to improving the precision of the coarse-scale models, and, more generally, the suggested form of the correction can also be used to calculate the movement of any solute that transports across an interface between two mobile fluids. We can also better understand the relative behaviors of passive tracers and those that are adsorbed.
We investigate the effect of heterogeneous petrophysical properties on Low Salinity Water Flooding (LSWF). We considered reservoir scale models, where the geological properties were obtained from a giant Middle East carbonate reservoir. The results are compared against a typical sandstone model. We simulated low salinity induced wettability changes in field scale models in which the petrophysical properties were randomly distributed with spatial correlation. We examined a wide range of geological realisations which mimic complex geological structures. Sandstone was simulated using a log-linear porosity-permeability relation with fairly good correlation. A carbonate reservoir from the Middle East was simulated where a much less correlated porosity permeability relationship was obtained. The salinity of formation water was set to typically observed values for the sandstone and carbonate cases. A number of simulations were then carried out to assess the flow behaviour. We have found that the general trend of permeability-porosity correlation has a key role that could mitigate or aggravate the impact of spatial distributions of petrophysical properties. We considered models with a log-linear permeability-porosity correlation, as generally observed for sandstone reservoirs. These are likely to be directly affected by the spatial distribution more than models with a power permeability-porosity correlation, which is often reported for flow units of carbonate reservoirs. The scatter of data in the permeability-porosity correlations had a relatively small impact on the flow performance. On the other hand, the effect of heterogeneity decreases with the width of the effective salinity range. Thus, uncertainty in carbonate reservoirs arises due to the ambiguity of spatial distribution of permeability and porosity would be less affects the LSWF predictability than in sandstone case. Overall, the incremental oil recovery due to LSWF was higher in the carbonate models than the sandstone cases. We observe from uncertainty analysis that the formation waterfront was less fingered than the low salinity waterfront and the salinity concentration. The dispersivity of salinity front and the water cut can be estimated for models with various degrees of heterogeneity. The outcome of the study is a better understanding of the implications of heterogeneity on LSWF. In some cases the behaviour can appear like a waterflood in very heterogeneous cases. It is important to assess the reservoir effectively to determine the best business decision.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.