Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is highly prevalent in the United States (US). Along with epidemic rates of obesity, the rate of OSA cases is also on the rise. OSA is associated with multiple chronic health conditions, including hypertension, diabetes, stroke, myocardial ischemia, and heart rhythm disturbances. OSA is commonly treated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. Several reports indicate that effective treatment of OSA can reduce the risk of cardiovascular diseases, including cardiac arrhythmias, especially atrial fibrillation (AF). CPAP therapy helps to maintain sinus rhythm after interventions such as electrical cardioversion and catheter ablation in patients with AF. However, more data is required to establish a relationship between OSA and other atrial arrhythmias as well to evaluate the effect of CPAP. This review will compile the latest evidence on the pathophysiology, management, and treatment of atrial arrhythmias associated with OSA.
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, is an ongoing pandemic that has affected millions globally. Many infected patients have been noted to have cardiovascular damage. Prior to the development of clinical symptoms, the use of transthoracic echocardiography, specifically with measurements of left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS), may provide an additional prognostic marker for patients infected with COVID-19. We sought to determine whether patients with COVID-19 and reduced LVGLS have an increased risk for mortality. The mean LVGLS was determined to be significantly lower in the non-survivors compared to the survivors (−11.6 ± 1.8 vs −15.4 ± 0.74, p<0.05). It should be noted, however, that even those that survived were found to have reduced LVGLS (<−18.5%). A multivariate logistic regression analysis was also performed that demonstrated a relationship between reduced LVGLS and an increased risk for mortality. Overall, our data indicate that COVID-19 patients may have subclinical left ventricular dysfunction, and that critically ill patients may have a greater decline in cardiac dysfunction.
Background: Haloperidol can be used off-label for agitation and/or delirium in older individuals. The recommended initial intramuscular or intravenous dose is 0.5 to 1 mg. However, the evidence to support these doses is nominal. Objectives: The primary outcome was to determine whether low-dose injectable haloperidol (≤0.5 mg) was similar in effect to higher doses by assessing the need for repeat doses within 4 hours as a surrogate marker. Secondary outcomes include comparison of length of stay, utilization of restraints, and discharge outcomes between dosage groups. Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center, cohort study. Patients aged ≥65 years who received haloperidol injectable who were not on antipsychotics prior to admission were reviewed. Results: In the low-dose group (n = 15), no patients required additional haloperidol doses within 4 hours compared with 1 patient each in the medium-dose (n = 23) and high-dose (n = 19) groups ( P = 0.94). There was a difference regarding length of stay, utilization of restraints, and discharge to facility when admitted from home favoring low-dose haloperidol. Conclusions and Relevance: While limited by sample size and retrospective design, patients who received low-dose haloperidol demonstrated similar efficacy to those who received higher doses of haloperidol. In addition, secondary outcomes mentioned above favored the use of low-dose haloperidol as well. Based on these findings, low-dose haloperidol is a reasonable initial dose for the agitated older patient.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.